This article examines the praise and controversy that a change in color to the façade of the Główny railway station in Wrocław, Poland, provoked during 2010–2012. Ethnographically following the definitions and makings of a “historical” color during the reconstruction process, it pinpoints two contrasting and conflicting ways of valuing and devaluing historicity: the “scientifically accurate” historicity versus the “familiar” one. Examining urban experts’ practices of valuating the historicity of this building, the valuation devices urban experts relied upon, and the versions of historicities they consequentially produced, this article shows that the “good” of historicity is not a given but is discovered and learned about by various actors during the very activities that constitute valuation.
ArcherA.StentS. (2011). Red socks and purple rain: The political uses of colour in late apartheid South Africa. Visual Communication, 10(2), 115–128.
2.
BarnettJ. R.MillerS.PearceE. (2006). Color and art: A brief history of pigments. Optics & Laser Technology, 38(4–6), 445–453.
3.
BarthesR. (1981). Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography. Hill and Wang.
4.
BartoliniN. (2014). Critical urban heritage: From Palimpsest to Brecciation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(5), 519–533.
5.
BenjaminW. (2003). Walter Benjamin: Selected writings, 1938–1940 (Vol. 4). Harvard University Press.
6.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth (Vol. 27). Princeton University Press.
7.
DehioG.RieglA. (1988). Konservieren, nicht restaurieren. Streitschriften zur Denkmalpflege um 1900[Preserve, not restore. Polemic pamphlets on the preservation of monuments around 1900]. Vieweg.
8.
DeSilveyC. (2006). Observed decay: Telling stories with mutable things. Journal of Material Culture, 11(3), 318–338.
9.
DeSilveyC. (2017). Curated decay: Heritage beyond saving. University of Minnesota Press.
10.
DeSilveyC.HarrisonR. (2020). Anticipating loss: Rethinking endangerment in heritage futures. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(1), 1–7.
11.
DimovaR. (2013). Ethno-Baroque: Materiality, aesthetics and conflict in modern-day Macedonia. Berghahn Books.
12.
DimovaR. (2019). Elusive centres of a Balkan city: Skopje between undesirable and reluctant heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(9), 958–973.
13.
Dominguez RubioF. (2014). Preserving the unpreservable: Docile and unruly objects at MoMA. Theory and Society, 43(6), 617–645.
14.
Dominguez RubioF. (2016). On the discrepancy between objects and things: An ecological approach. Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 59–86.
15.
Douglas-JonesR.HughesJ. J.JonesS.YarrowT. (2016). Science, value and material decay in the conservation of historic environments. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 21, 823–833.
16.
EilerR. S. (1959). Experiencing architecture. MIT Press.
17.
FehérváryK. (2013). Politics in color and concrete: Socialist materialities and the middle class in Hungary. Indiana University Press.
18.
FosterS. M.JonesS. (2019). Concrete and non-concrete: Exploring the contemporary authenticity of historic replicas through an ethnographic study of the St John’s Cross replica, Iona. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(11), 1169–1188.
19.
FoucaultM. (1975). Discipline and punish. Gallimard.
20.
GastrowC. (2017). Cement citizens: Housing, demolition and political belonging in Luanda, Angola. Citizenship Studies, 21(2), 224–239.
21.
GrasseniC. (2004). Skilled vision. An apprenticeship in breeding aesthetics. Social Anthropology, 12(1), 41–55.
22.
GriswoldW.MangioneG.McDonnellT. E. (2013). Objects, words, and bodies in space: Bringing materiality into cultural analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 343–364.
23.
HennionA. (2017). Attachments, you say? How a concept collectively emerges in one research group. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10(1), 112–121.
24.
HerzfeldM. (2009). Evicted from eternity: The restructuring of modern Rome. University of Chicago Press.
25.
HeutsF.MolA. (2013). What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 125–146.
26.
HirtS. (2013). Whatever happened to the (Post)socialist city?Cities, 32, S29–S38.
27.
HuyssenA. (2003). Present pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford University Press.
28.
JacobsJ. M. (2006). A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13(1), 1–27.
29.
JonesS. (2010). Negotiating authentic objects and authentic selves: Beyond the deconstruction of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture, 15(2), 181–203.
30.
JonesS.YarrowT. (2013). Crafting authenticity: An ethnography of conservation practice. Journal of Material Culture, 18(1), 3–26.
31.
KosharR. J. (2000). Germany’s transient pasts: Preservation and national memory in the twentieth century. University of North Carolina Press.
32.
KrivýM. (2015). Greyness and color desires: The chromatic politics of the Panelák in late-socialist and post-socialist Czechoslovakia. The Journal of Architecture, 20(5), 765–802.
33.
KusenbachM. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.
34.
LowenthalD. (1985). The past is another country. Cambridge University Press.
35.
LowenthalD. (1992). Authenticity? The dogma of self-delusion. In JonesM. (Ed.), Why fakes matter: Essays on problems of authenticity (pp. 184–192). British Museum.
36.
LyonD. (2012). The labour of refurbishment: The building and the body in space and time. In PinkS.DaintyA.TuttD. (Eds.), Ethnographic research in the construction industry (pp. 41–57). Routledge.
37.
MacdonaldS. (2009). Reassembling Nuremberg, reassembling heritage. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2(1–2), 117–134.
38.
MacdonaldS. (2013). Memorylands: Heritage and identity in Europe today. Routledge.
39.
MarksL. E. (1978). The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. Academic Press.
40.
MeyerB.De WitteM. (2013). Heritage and the sacred: Introduction. Material Religion, 9(3), 274–280.
41.
MolA. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
42.
MukerjiC. (2012). Space and political pedagogy at the gardens of Versailles. Public Culture, 24(3 68), 509–534.
43.
Muñoz-ViñasS. (2005). Contemporary theory of conservation. Elsevier.
44.
NelsonM. (2009). Bluets. Wave Books.
45.
Rose-GreenlandF. (2016). Color perception in sociology: Materiality and authenticity at the gods in color show. Sociological Theory, 34(2), 81–105.
46.
SeznevaO. (2013). Architecture of descent: Historical reconstructions and the politics of belonging in Kaliningrad, The Former Königsberg. Journal of Urban History, 39(4), 767–787.
47.
ShapinS. (2012). The sciences of subjectivity. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 170–184.
48.
SlackJ. D.HristovaS. (2017). Culture in-colour. Cultural Studies, 31(4), 449–469.
49.
StratiA. (2003). Knowing in practice: Aesthetic understanding and tacit knowledge. In NorthK.KumtaG. (Eds.), Knowing in organisations (pp. 33–66). M.E. Sharpe.
50.
StrebelI. (2011). The living building: Towards a geography of maintenance work. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(03), 243–262.
51.
SurM. (2017). The blue urban: Coloring and constructing Kolkata. City, 21(5), 597–606.
52.
TaitM.WhileA. (2009). Ontology and the conservation of built heritage. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 721–737.
53.
TaussigM. (2009). What color is the sacred. The University of Chicago Press.
54.
ThévenotL. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In CetinaK. K.SchatzkiT. R.von SavignyE. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56–73). Routledge.
55.
ThévenotL. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 409–423.
56.
ThumG. (2011). Uprooted: How Breslau became Wroclaw during the century of expulsions. Princeton University Press.
van de PortM.MeyerB. (2018). Heritage dynamics: Politics of authentication, aesthetics of persuasion and the cultural production of the real: Introduction. In MeyerB.van de PortM. (Eds.), Sense and essence. Heritage and the cultural production of the real (pp. 1–39). Berghahn Books.
