This article develops a conceptual framework to examine the ancestry and evolution of urban forms within the context of cultural space and its social meaning. The framework is intended as a means for organizing and interpreting information, as was Rapoport’s schema, but differs in its perspective. Rapoport begins with design elements and links them to culture; we begin with culture as a process and connect it with contextual settings through which images and configurations are generated and positioned. The framework is applied to the cultural process in Bali by focusing on ideology, religion, and aesthetics, which are treated as the main “doors of perception.” This allows a connection with the concept of a social construction of space and highlights the importance of remediating social conflict with shared values. Examples are used to illustrate the relevance of the doors of perception to urban planning and design in completing the nexus to space–time meaning.
AllenP.CarmencitaP. (2005). Ajeg Bali: Multiple meanings, diverse agendas. Indonesia and the Malay World, 33(97), 239-255.
2.
AlthusserL. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (BrewsterB., Trans.). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
AskovicI. (1997, August). Penciptaan Tradisi Moderen Dalam Seni Pertunjukan Bali (Creating modern traditions in Balinese performing arts). Paper presented at conference organized by the Society for Balinese Studies, The Cultural Concept of Bali. The Ngurah Rai University, Denpasar, Bali.
5.
BoothA. (2003). Decentralisation and poverty alleviation in Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21, 181-202.
6.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
DavidsonJ. S.HenleyD. (Eds.). (2007). The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of Adat from colonialism to indigenism. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
15.
DaviesS. (2007). Balinese aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(1), 21-29.
16.
DebordG. (1967). The society of the spectacle. London, England: Zone Books.
17.
DibiaI. W.BallingerR. (2004). Balinese dance, drama and music: A guide to the performing arts of Bali. North Clarendon, VT: Tuttle.
18.
DurkheimE. (1982). The rules of sociological method (edited and with an introduction by LukesS.). New York, NY: Free Press.
19.
EdelmanM. (2001). Social movements: Changing paradigms and forms of politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 285-317.
20.
ElsonR. E. (2008). Suharto: A political biography, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GeertzC. (1980). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hauser-SchäublinB. (2013). How indigenous are the Balinese? From national marginalization to provincial domination. In Hauser-SchäublinB. (Ed.), Adat and indigeneity in Indonesia (pp. 133-148). Göttengen, Germany: University of Göttengen Press.
29.
HenleyD.DavidsonJ. S. (2007). Introduction: Radical conservatism—The protean policies of adat. In DavidsonJ. S.HenleyD. (Eds.), The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of Adat from colonialism to indigenism (pp. 1-49). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
30.
HirschP.WarrenC. (2002). The politics of environment in Southeast Asia. London, England: Routledge.
31.
HulsetherM. (2005). Religion and culture. In HinnellsJ. R. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to the study of religion (pp. 489-508). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
32.
JohnsonS. (2010). Where good ideas come from. London, England: Penguin.
KristellerP. O. (1951). The modern system of the arts: A study in the history of aesthetics part I. Journal of the History of Ideas, 12, 496-527.
35.
LaurinK.PlaksJ. E. (2014). Religion and punishment: Opposing influences of orthopraxy and orthodoxy on reactions to unintentional acts. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 5, 835-843.
36.
LowS. M. (1996). Spatializing culture: The social production and social construction of pubic space in Costa Rica. American Ethnologist, 23, 861-879.
37.
LowS. M. (2009). Towards an anthropological theory of space and place. Semiotica, 175, 21-37.
38.
MacRaeG. (2006). Banua or negara? The culture of land in south Bali. In ReuterT. (Ed.), Sharing the earth, dividing the land (pp. 83-112). Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
39.
McGrawM. C. (2013). Radical traditions: Reimaging culture in Balinese contemporary music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
McLuhanM. (1963). The medium is the message. In McLuhanM.LaphamL. H. (Eds.), Understanding media: The extensions of man (pp. 7-21). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/mcluhan.mediummessage.pdf
41.
MehrN. (2009). Constructive bloodbath in Indonesia: The United States, Great Britain and the mass killings of 1965-1966, London, England: Spokesman Books.
NyeJ. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
44.
PicardM. (1990). “Cultural tourism” in Bali: Cultural performances as tourist attraction. Indonesia, 49, 37-74.
45.
PicardM. (2008). Balinese identity as tourist attraction: From “cultural tourism” (pariwisatabudaya) to “Bali erect” (Ajeg Bali). Tourist Studies, 8, 155-173.
46.
PicardM. (2011). Balinese religion in search of recognition: From Agama Hindu Bali to Agama Hindu (1945-1965). Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia), 167, 482-510.
47.
PouivetR. (2000). On the cognitive functioning of aesthetic emotions. Leonardo, 33(1), 49-53.
48.
PringleR. (2004). A short history of Bali. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
49.
PutraM. S.KrisnatiD. (2013). Marketing strategy formulation and implementation at the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Culture Park to create word of mouth marketing. Indonesian Journal of Business Administration, 2, 455-459.
50.
RapoportA. (1969). House, form and culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51.
RapoportA. (1977). The human aspects of urban form. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
52.
RehmannJ. (2014). Theories of ideology: The powers of alienation and subjection. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
53.
RidengI. W.NurjayaI. N.SubawaI. M.DjatmikaP. (2015). Assembly of desa pakraman role as resolver of disputes between desa pakraman in Bali. International Journal of Applied Sociology, 5(3), 131-138.
54.
RobinsonG. (1995). The dark side of paradise—Political violence in Bali. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
55.
RudofskyB. (1964). Architecture without architects: A short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
SandersonS. K. (2008). Adaptation, evolution and religion. Religion, 38, 141-156.
58.
ShimamuraA. P. (2012). Toward a science of aesthetics: Issues and ideas. In ShimamuraA. P.PalmerS. E. (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains and experiences (pp. 3-28). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
59.
SinghR. P. B.AktorM. (2015), Hinduism and globalization. In BrunnS. D. (Ed.), Changing world religion map: Sacred placed, identities, practices and politics (pp. 1917-1932). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media.
Sreeranjani Subba RaoK. (1998). Hinduism and the new economic policy. International Review of Sociology, 8, 333-238.
63.
Stuart-FoxM. (2015). Rethinking the evolution of culture and cognitive structure. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15(1-2), 109-130.
64.
SuartikaG. A. M. (2007). Territoriality and the market system—Adat land vs. state regulations on land matters in Bali. Habitat International, 31, 167-176.
65.
SuartikaG. A. M. (2010). Morphing Bali. The state, planning and culture. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lambert Academic.
66.
SujarwotoS. (2012). Political decentralization and local public services performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2(3), 55-84.
TaliaferroC. (2003). Philosophy of religion. In BunninN.Tsui-JamesE. P. (Eds.), Blackwell companion to philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 453-489). Oxford, England. Blackwell.
69.
ToffinG. (1994). Ecology and anthropology of traditional dwellings. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 5(2), 9-20.
70.
VickersA. (1989). A paradise created. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Penguin Books.
71.
VickersA. (Ed.). (1996). Being modern in Bali. New Haven, CT: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.
72.
VipriyantiN. U. (2008, July14-18). Banjar adat and local wisdom: Community management for public space sustainability in Bali Province. Paper presented at IASC 2008 12th Biennial Conference, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Bali.
73.
WardanaA. (2014). Alliances and contestations in the legal production of space: The case of Bali. Asian Journal of Contemporary Law, 9, 145-171.
74.
WarrenC. (1993). Adat and Dinas: Balinese communities in the Indonesian state. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University Press.
75.
WarrenC. (2005). Community mapping, local planning and alternative land use strategies in Bali. Geografisk Tidsskrift (Danish Journal of Geography), 105(1), 29-41.
76.
WarrenC. (2007). Adat in Balinese discourse and practice: Locating citizenship and the commonweal. In DavidsonJ. S.HenleyD. (Eds.), The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of Adat from colonialism to indigenism (pp. 170-202). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
77.
WeinerM. J. (1995). Doors of perception: Power and representation in Bali. Cultural Anthropology, 10, 472-508.
78.
WibawaA. P. (2017). Symbolic battle in Benoa Bay reclamation, Bali, Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Research, 6, 744-748.
79.
WijayaM. (2002). Architecture of Bali: A source book of traditional and modern forms. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
80.
WilliamsR (2013). Culture is ordinary. In McGuiganJ. (Ed.), Raymond Williams on culture and society essential writings (pp.1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Originally published 1958)
