Spatial design and placemaking are fundamental to create a vibrant urban life, whereas video games are designed primarily for temporary amusement. However, they both share the same essence of creating large-scale artificial environments for human interaction as their fundamental value. Video game developers have been successfully using spatial design tools to create virtual environments to engage players and build narratives, understanding, and appropriating many characteristics of what makes a place tick. In this article, we argue that spatial design and placemaking could learn from video games development, by incorporating features ranging from storytelling and multiple viewpoints to participatory practices and flexible design.
CallejaG. (2007). Digital game involvement: A conceptual model. Games and Culture, 2, 236-260. doi:10.1177/1555412007306206
3.
GaberJ. (2007). Simulating planning: SimCity as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 113-121. doi:10.1177/0739456X07305791
GoldingD. (2013). Putting the player back in their place: Spatial analysis from below. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 5, 117-130. doi:10.1386/jgvw.5.2.117_1
HanzlM. (2007). Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: A review of experiments and potentials. Design Studies, 28, 289-307. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.003
8.
IndraprasthaA.ShinozakiM. (2009). The investigation on using Unity 3D game engine in urban design study. Journal of ICT Research and Applications, 3(1), 1-18. doi:10.5614/itbj.ict.2009.3.1.1
JenkinsH. (2010). Transmedia storytelling and entertainment: An annotated syllabus. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 24, 943-958. doi:10.1080/10304312.2010.510599
12.
JuulJ. (2005). Half real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
KentS. (2000). The first quarter: A 25-year history of video games. Bothell, WA: BWD Press.
14.
KoutsabasisP. (2012). On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design. Design Studies, 33, 357-390. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.11.004
15.
LemkeJ. (2009). Multimodality, identity, and time. In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 140-150). London, England: Routledge.
16.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
MaherM. L.SimoffS.GabrielG. (2000). Participatory design and communication in virtual environments. In CherkaskyT.GreenbaumJ.MambreyP.PorsJ. K. (Eds.), PDC 2000 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (pp. 127-134). Retrieved from http://rossy.ruc.dk/ojs/index.php/pdc/article/viewFile/200/192
19.
Maxis. (1989). SimCity: The city simulator (User documentation). Walnut Creek, CA: Author.
20.
MinneryJ.SearleG. (2014). Toying with the city? Using the computer game SimCity™4 in planning education. Planning Practice & Research, 29, 41-55. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.829335
21.
PicardM. (2014). Levels. In WolfM.PerronB. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to video games studies (pp. 99-106). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
PooleS. (2000). Trigger happy: Videogames and the entertainment revolution. New York, NY: Arcade.
23.
SquireK. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29. doi:10.3102/0013189X035008019
