In the article, the position of the street artist as translator is analyzed on the basis of the concept of the semiosphere developed by the Russian-Estonian semiotician Yuri Lotman. The methodological framework of the Tartu-Moscow school of semiotics is applied to the phenomenon of contemporary public art. The process of translation between texts in urban space is illustrated by examples of works of art that use modifications of the same object—a telephone booth.
BakhtinM. (1990). Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekovia i Renessansa [Oeuvre of François Rabelais and folk culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow, Russia: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura.
2.
BühlerK. (1990). The new model: The three semantic functions of language. In BühlerK., Theory of language: The representational function of language (pp. 34-37; GoodwinD. F., Trans.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. (Original work published 1934).
3.
JakobsonR. (1971). Language in relation to other communication systems. In JakobsonR., Selected writings: Word and language (Vol. 2, pp. 697-711). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
LotmanY. (1992) O semiosfere [On the semiosphere]. In LotmanY., Izbrannyie stat’i v trekh tomakh. Tom 1: Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury. [Selected Articles in Three Volumes. Volume 1: Articles on Semiotics and Typology of Culture] (pp.11-25). Tallinn: Alexandra.
7.
LotmanY. (1998). Problema shodstva iskusstva i zhyzni v svete struktural’nogo podhoda [The problem of similarity of art and life from the point of view of structural approach]. In LotmanY., Ob iskusstve [On art] (pp. 378-387). Saint Petersburg, Russia: Iskusstvo.
8.
LotmanY. (2002). Tezisy k probleme “Iskusstvo v riadu modeliruyushchih sistem” [Theses to the problem “Art in the line of modeling systems.” In LotmanY., Stat’i po semiotike iskusstva i kultury [Articles on semiotics of art and culture] (pp. 274-294). Saint Petersburg, Russia: Akademicheskiy Proekt.
9.
LotmanY. (2010a). Fenomen kul’tury [The phenomenon of culture]. In LotmanY., Semiosfera [Semiosphere] (pp. 568-579). Saint Petersburg, Russia: Iskusstvo.
10.
LotmanY. (2010b). Vnutri mysliashchih mirov [Inside universes of mind]. In LomanY., Semiosfera [Semiosphere] (pp. 150-391). Saint Petersburg, Russia: Iskusstvo.
11.
MukařovskýJ. (1996). Poeticheskoie naimenovanie i esteticheskaya funkcija jazyka [Poetical naming and aesthetic function of language]. In MukařovskýJ., Struktural’naia poetika [Structural poetics] (pp. 132-140). Moscow, Russia: “Jazyki russkoi kul’tury.”
12.
MurphetJ. (2005). Postmodernism and space. In ConnorS. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to postmodernism (pp. 116-136). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
PetrovskiM. (1925). Metonimia. In BrodskiN. (Ed.), Literaturnaia encyclopedia: Slovar’ literaturnyh terminov [Literature encyclopedia: Dictionary of literature terms] (Vol. 1). Moscow, Russia: L. D. Frenkel.
14.
TchertovL. (2002). Spatial semiosis in culture. Sign System Studies, 30, 441-452.
