This essay works with afterimages of the steel industry to explore the material legacies and many afterlives of industrial remains in Dortmund. Inspired both by Walter Benjamin’s writings on the afterimages of capitalist modernity in the Arcades Project, and by the afterimages of steel produced by Haiko Hebig, the article gathers fragmented encounters in an account that evokes the materiality, textures, co-habitations, and memories of Dortmund’s postindustrial landscape.
BarndtK. (2010). Memory traces of an abandoned set of future: Industrial ruins in the postindustrial landscapes of Germany. In HellJ.SchönleA. (Eds.), Ruins of modernity (pp. 270-293). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
BenjaminW. (1973). Charles Baudelaire: A lyric poet in the era of high capitalism. London, England: New Left Books.
3.
BenjaminW. (1978) Surrealism: The last snapshot of the European Intelligentsia. New Left Review108, 47-56.
4.
BenjaminW. (1999a). The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
EdensorT. (2005b). The ghosts of industrial ruins: Ordering and disordering memory in excessive space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 829-849.
21.
EdensorT. (2005c). Waste matter: The debris of industrial ruins and the disordering of the material world. Journal of Material Culture, 10, 311-332.
22.
EdensorT. (2008). Mundane hauntings: Commuting through the phantasmorgic working-class spaces of Manchester, England. Cultural Geographies, 15, 313-333.
23.
GillochG. (1997). Myth and metropolis: Walter Benjamin and the city. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
24.
GregsonN.WatkinsH.CalestaniM. (2010). Inextinguishable fibres: Demolition and the vital materialisms of asbestos. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1065-1083.
25.
HarveyD. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
26.
HetheringtonK. (2001). Phantasmagoria/Phantasm Agora: Materialities, spatialities and ghosts. Space and Culture, 11/12, 24-41.
27.
HetheringtonK. (2005). Memories of capitalism: Cities, phantasmagoria and arcades. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 187-200.
28.
HinchliffeS.KearnesM.DegenM.WhatmoreS. (2005). Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 643-658.
29.
HospersG.-J. (2004). Restructuring Europe’s rustbelt: The case of the German Ruhrgebeit. Intereconomics, 39, 147-156.
30.
JacobsJ. M. (2006). A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13, 1-27.
31.
KohnM. (2009). Dreamworlds of deindustrialization. Theory & Event, 12(4). doi:10.1353/tae.0.0096
32.
KruparS. (2007). Where eagles dare: An ethno-fable with personal landfill. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 194-212.
33.
LawJ. (2005). After method: Dealing with mess in the social sciences. London, England: Routledge.
34.
LeslieE. (1999). Telescoping the microscopic object: Walter Benjamin, the collector. In ColesA. (Ed.), The optic of Walter Benjamin. De-, Dis-, Ex. (Vol. 3, pp. 58-91). London, England: Black Dog.
35.
LeslieE. (2005). Synthetic worlds: Nature, art and the chemical industry. London, England: Reaktion.
36.
LongJ. J. (2008). Paratextual profusion: Photography and text in Bertolt Brecht’s War Primer. Poetics Today, 29, 197-224.
37.
MarxK.EngelsF. (1967). The communist manifesto. London, England: Penguin Books.
38.
PinderD. (2001). Ghostly footsteps: Voices, memories and walks in the city. Cultural Geographies, 8, 1-19.
39.
PredA. (1995). Recognizing European modernities: A montage of the present. London, England: Routledge.
40.
SmithsonR. (1967, December). A tour of the monuments of Passaic. Artforum, pp. 52-57.
StewartK. (1996). Space on the other side of the road. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
43.
TaggJ. (1996). This city which is not one. In KingA. D. (Ed.), Re-presenting the city (pp. 179-182). Basingstoke, England: Macmillan Press.
44.
TaussigM. (2004). My cocaine museum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
TaussigM. (2009). What color is the sacred. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
TillK. E. (2008). Artistic and activist memory-work: Approaching place-based practice. Memory Studies, 1, 99-113.
47.
TillJ. (2009). Architecture depends. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
van der HoornM. (2003). Exorcising remains: Architectural fragments as intermediaries between history and individual experience. Journal of Material Culture, 8, 189-213.
49.
VarvantakisC. (2009). A monument to dismantlement. Memory Studies, 2, 27-38.
50.
VidlerA. (1992). The architectural uncanny: Essays in the modern unhomely. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
WhatmoreS.HinchliffeS. (2003). Living cities: Making space for urban nature. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 22, 137-150.
52.
WhatmoreS.HinchliffeS. (2006). Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture, 15, 123-138.
53.
WollenP. (1978). Photography and aesthetics. Screen, 19(4), 9-28.
54.
YoungJ. (1992). The counter-monument: Memory against itself in Germany today. Critical Inquiry, 18, 267-296.
