Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Accessibility considerations tend to dominate discussions about disability and the built environment. Although many architects object to the constraints of accessibility regulations, the shallow ramps, wide passages, and spatial continuity typical of barrier-free design are not foreign to architectural discourse. They rather mesh effortlessly with architecture’s long-standing preoccupation with movement. Unfortunately, the proximity between architectural discourse’s focus on mobile experiences and the demands of disability activists distract from considering other relationships between architecture and the human body. This article explores the similarities and differences between mobility disabilities and sensory disabilities and proposes the notion of “perceiving otherwise” to reconsider how architectural space may be conceptualized. It discusses that notion through readings of selected contemporary architectural works, including Rem Koolhaas’s Bordeaux House (1998) and Peter Eisenman’s Memorial to the Murdered European Jews in Berlin (2005).

Keywords

architecture design disability perception senses synesthesia Koolhaas Eisenman

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bahan

Bauman

(2008). The power of place: The evolution of Kendall Green. In Greenwald

B. H.

Van Cleve

J. V.

(Eds.), A fair chance in the race of life: The role of Gallaudet University in deaf history (pp. 154-169). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

Benjamin

(1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction ( Zohn

, Trans.). In Arendt

(Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217-251). New York, NY: Schocken. (Original work written 1936)

Breckenridge

C. A.

Vogler

(2001). The critical limits of embodiment: Disability’s criticism. Public Culture, 13, 349-357.

Centre Suisse pour la construction adaptée aux handicapés. (2005). L’art d’une architecture discriminatoire. [The Art of a Discriminatory Architecture] Info, 42, 2-4.

Classen

(1998). The color of angels: Cosmology, gender and the aesthetic imagination. London, England: Routledge.

Eisenman

(2006). Feints. Milan, Italy: Skira.

Ferro

Kebbal

Potie

(1987). Le Corbusier: Le Couvent de la Tourette. Marseille, France: Editions Parenthèses.

Foucault

(1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1, Hurley

, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage. (Original work published 1976)

Foucault

(1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison ( Sheridan

, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon. (Original work published 1976)

10.

Harrison

(2001). Synesthesia: The strangest thing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

11.

Hays

K. M.

(2010). Architecture’s desire: Reading the late avant-garde. Cambridge: MIT Press.

12.

Hockenberry

(1995). Moving violations: War zones, wheelchairs, and declarations of independence. New York, NY: Hyperion.

13.

Imrie

(1999). The body, disability and Le Corbusier’s conception of the radiant environment. In Butler

Parr

(Eds.), Mind and body spaces: Geographies of illness, impairment and disability (pp. 25-44). London, England: Routledge.

14.

Koolhaas

(1978). Delirious New York: A retroactive manifesto for Manhattan. New York, NY: Monacelli Press.

15.

Koolhaas

(1996). Casa en Burdeos [House in Bordeaux]. El Croquis, 79, 164-175.

16.

Kristeva

(2003). Lettre ouverte au président de la République sur les citoyens en situation de handicap, à l’usage de ceux qui le sont et ceux qui ne le sont pas [Open letter to the President of the Republic on citizens with disabilities, for the use of those who are disabled and those who are not]. Paris, France: Fayard.

17.

Leder

(1990). The absent body. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Lerup

(2000). After the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.

19.

Linton

(1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York, NY: New York University Press.

20.

Malnar

Vodvarka

(2004). Sensory design. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

21.

McNeill

(1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Merleau-Ponty

(1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception [The phenomenology of perception]. Paris, France: Gallimard.

23.

Pallasmaa

(2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

24.

Paterson

Hughes

(1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability and Society, 14(5), 597-610.

25.

Pringle

(2005). Spatial pleasures. Space and Culture, 8, 141-159.

26.

Rykwert

(1996). The dancing column: On order in architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

27.

Rykwert

(2008). The judicious eye: Architecture against the other arts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Serres

(1985). Les cinq sens: Philosophie des corps mêlés-1 [The five senses: A philosophy of mingled bodies]. Paris, France: Grasset.

29.

Snyder

S. L.

Mitchell

D. T.

(2001). Re-engaging the body: Disability studies and the resistance to embodiment. Public Culture, 13, 367-389.

30.

Wölfflin

(1994). Prolegomena to a psychology of architecture ( Mallgrave

H. F.

Ikonomou

, Trans.). In Vischer

(Ed.), Empathy, form and space: Problems in German aesthetics, 1873-1893 (pp. 149-162). Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities. (Original work published 1886)

Seeing Motion Otherwise

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References