This article explores the general relationship of language and culture via the notion of centeredness, which the author suggests is a recurring cultural value instantiated in how the Mam (Maya) conceive of the world, both practically and philosophically. This article specifically looks at the constructed world of the Mam (and, more generally, the Maya), their homes and towns, and the metaphysical idea of being centered in life and in relationships with others. It is further suggested that centeredness serves as a formal grammatical theme in Mam, a basis and “center stake” from which deictic spatial notions are computed, and the author shows briefly how such a center is instantiated in the lexicon, the morphosyntax, and the discourse structure of Mam. The author concludes that language and culture are “interconstitutive, through overlap and interplay between people’s cultural practices and preoccupations and the grammatical structures they habitually employ (Enfield, 2002, pp. 3-4).”
Bohannan, P., & Glazer, M. ( 1988). High points in anthropology. New York : Alfred A. Knoph. (Original work published 1953).
2.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2003). The Berber house. In S. M. Low & D. Lawrence-Zúñiga (Eds.), The anthropology of space and place: Locating culture (pp. 131-141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1971).
3.
Collins, W.M. ( 2005). Centeredness as a cultural and grammatical theme in Maya-Mam. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University , Columbus.
4.
Demarest, A., Morgan, K., Wolley, C., & Escobedo, H. ( 2003). The political acquisition of sacred geography: The murciélagos complex at Dos Pilas. In J. J. Christie (Ed.), Maya palaces and elite residences: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 120-183). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
Duranti, A. ( 1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Edmonson, M.S. ( 1993). The Mayan faith. In G. H. Gossen & M. León-Portilla (Eds.), South and Meso-American native spirituality: From the cult of the feathered serpent to the theology of liberation (pp. 65-86). New York: Crossroad.
7.
Enfield, N.J. ( 2002). Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
England, N.C. ( 1978). Space as a Mam grammatical theme. In N. C. England (Ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics (pp. 225-238). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
9.
England, N.C. ( 1983). A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. Austin: University of Texas Press.
10.
Foster, G.M. ( 1994). Hippocrates’ Latin American legacy. Reading, MA: Gordon & Breach.
11.
Freidel, D., Schele, L., & Parker, J. ( 1993). Maya cosmos: Three thousand years on the shaman’s path. New York: William Morrow.
12.
Geertz, C. ( 1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Harper Collins.
13.
Gillespie, S.D. ( 2000). Maya "nested houses." In R. A. Joyce & S. D. Gillespie (Eds.), Beyond kinship: Social and material reproduction in house societies (pp. 135-160). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
Gossen, G. ( 1974). Chamulas in he world of the sun. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Gumperz, J.J., & Levinson, S.C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Hanks, William F.1990. Referential practice: language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Haviland, J.B. ( 1996). Projections, transpositions and relativity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 271-323). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. ( 1966). Two types of linguistic relativity. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics, proceedings of the UCLA sociolinguistics conference, 1964 ( Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 20; pp. 114-165). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
20.
Lee, P. ( 1996). The Whorf theory complex: A critical reconstruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21.
Levinson, S.C. ( 2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Levinson, S.C., & Wilkins, D.P. ( 2006). Grammars of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Levi-Strauss, C. ( 1988). Social structure. In P. Bohannan & M. Glazer (Eds.), High points in anthropology (pp. 422-500). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Original work published 1953).
24.
Low, S.M. ( 2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture . Austin: University of Texas Press .
25.
Low, S.M., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (2003). The anthropology of space and place: Locating culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
Lucy, J.A. ( 1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Nájera, M.I. ( 1987). El don de la sangre en el equilibrio cósmico: el sacrificio y el autosacrificio sangriente entre los antiguos mayas [The gift of blood for cosmic equilibrium: blood sacrifice and self-sacrifice among the ancient Maya]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
28.
Odilio, J.S. ( 2008). Los caminos de resistencia: comunidad, política e historia maya en Guatemala [Roads of resistance: Mayan community, politics and history in Guatemala]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
29.
Redfield, R. ( 1941). The folk culture of Yucatan. Chicago . University of Chicago Press.
30.
Reynoso, F. D. de. ( 1916). Vocabulario de la lengua Mame. México : Departamento de Imprenta de la Secretaria de Fomento . (Original work published 1644).
31.
Robinson, J.W. ( 1989). Architecture as a medium for culture: Public institution and private house. In S. M. Low & E. Chambers (Eds.), Housing, culture, and design: A comparative perspective (pp. 253-279). Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
Scotchmer, D.G. ( 1978). Grammatical and semantic components of Ostuncalco Mam -c’u’j terms. Unpublished manuscript, University of New York at Albany.
33.
Scully, V. ( 1991). Architecture: The natural and the manmade. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
34.
Vogt, E.Z. ( 1969). Zinacantan: A Maya community in the highlands of Chiapas . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Wierzbicka, A. ( 1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.
