Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Pruritus is a common complaint in patients with end-stage renal disease. Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is a tryptophan end metabolite extremely renal excreted. Activated charcoal can interfere with IS intestinal absorption.

Objectives:

To evaluate the serum level of IS and the effect of activated charcoal on uremic pruritus.

Materials and Methods:

In all, 135 participants were divided into 2 main groups. In total, 45 normal and healthy individuals as a control group and 90 patients on regular hemodialysis; 45 of these patients had uremic pruritus and the other 45 were not complaining of uremic pruritus. Serum IS was measured. Activated charcoal was used by patients with uremic pruritus. The severity of pruritus and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed.

Results:

The serum IS was significantly elevated in uremic patients than in control subjects (P < .001) and significantly elevated in uremic patients without pruritus (P < .001). Furthermore, there were positive significant correlations between the serum IS and both severity of pruritus (P < .001) and DLQI (P < .001). After activated charcoal usage, there was a significant decrease in IS level with the improvement of pruritus and quality of life of patients.

Conclusions:

IS may play a role in uremic pruritus. Activated charcoal could be considered a treatment for uremic pruritus.

Keywords

uremic pruritus indoxyl sulfate activated charcoal

Introduction

Uremic pruritus is a distressing symptom in more than 60% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).^1,2 Several mechanisms have been postulated in this complaint, yet; the data are still inconclusive.^3-5 Although regular hemodialysis may result in a partial improvement in pruritus, many patients continue to complain of pruritus.^6,7

Tryptophan “an essential amino acid” is converted into indole by the act of intestinal microbes and further metabolized by the liver into indoxyl sulfate (IS).^8,9 Mainly the secretion of renal tubular, and bound to serum albumin, deteriorated kidney or regular hemodialysis cannot excrete IS.^10,11

Aim of the Study

We aimed to investigate the role of IS in uremic pruritus and the effect of decreasing the level of IS on the severity of pruritus.

Type of the Study

A quasi-interventional study.

Subjects and Methods

Ethical Approval

This study was performed after the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB; approval number: RC 22-10-2022) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05634083). All the participants were informed about the aim and nature of the study and were not subjected to any harmful procedure. Written informed consent was taken from each participant.

Subjects

This study recruited 90 participants from both sexes older than 18 years. These participants were divided into 2 main groups; Group I included 45 apparently healthy individuals as a control group, and Group II included 90 patients with ESRD under regular hemodialysis (3 sessions per week) for more than a year at a single hemodialysis unit. These patients were equally subdivided into 2 groups: group IIA included patients complaining of uremic pruritus not improved after the hemodialysis, and group IIB included patients who did not complain of uremic pruritus. All the 3 groups were age, sex, body mass index, and socioeconomic level matched. Patients with autoimmune disorders, blood diseases, nutritional deficiency, inflammatory bowel disorders, itchy dermatological disease, hepatic disease, suffering from malignancy, under chemotherapy or receiving chemotherapy in the past 6 months, or failed renal transplantation were excluded from this study.

Methods

A detailed medical history was taken from patients regarding the cause, onset, and duration of renal failure. A complete dermatological examination was done on all participants. The severity of pruritus was assessed using the visual analog scale¹² at the initiation of the study and after 2 months of the study before the hemodialysis session. This is a 10-point scale and measures pruritus degree, course, the surface area involved, and the associated sleep disturbance, and classified as no pruritus (score 0), mild pruritus (score 1-3), moderate (score 4-7), and severe (score >7).¹³

Concurrently, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)¹⁴ by a self-report validated Arabic version of the questionnaire.¹⁵ This score ranged from 0 to 30, and the impact on quality of life was divided into no impact (score 0-1), small impact (score 2-5), moderate impact (score 6-10), very large impact (score 11-20), and extremely impact (score 21-30).¹⁶

Activated Charcoal

Uremic patients in group IIA were supplied with an activated charcoal tablet (Biocarbon^®, Chem.-Pharm. Fabrik GmbH, Vienna, Austria). Patients were instructed to take 2 tablets after each meal (250 mg/tablet) for 2 months. No other anti-itching therapy was used during the study. There was a follow-up of patients at every hemodialysis session and reported side effects were recorded. None of the patients were lost during the period of the study.

Laboratory Investigations

An 8 ml morning venous blood sample was taken from the control group. A comparable venous blood sample was taken from uremic patients before the hemodialysis session and from patients in group IIA after 2 months of activated charcoal intake. The blood lifted to clot, the liquid serum was separated into 2 parts; the first part was used to measure hemoglobin, albumin, calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone levels, while the second part was stored at −45° and used for measurement of IS. Measurement of IS was done using a human monoclonal antibody IS ELISA Kit (Catalog No.: MBS3802650; MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical Analysis

The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and tabulated in an Excel file. The analysis of these data was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics^® version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The P ≤ .05 was selected as a point of significance. Comparison of means was used for numerical data of normally distributed variables by analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Independent Simple test, while categorical variable differences were analyzed with χ² (chi-square) test. The existence of correlations between values was tested using Spearman correlation analysis.

Results

The demographic, clinical, and laboratory results are briefed in Table 1. Blood hypertension was the most common cause of renal failure (23 patients in group IIA, 23 patients in group IIB) followed by diabetes mellitus (11 patients in group IIA, 10 patients in group IIB), chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7 patients in group IIA, 8 patients in group IIB), urinary tract infection (3 patients in group IIA, 2 patients in group IIB), and unknown cause in the remaining patients. There was no significant difference between patients in group IIA and patients in group IIB regarding the mean duration of starting hemodialysis (6.18 ± 3.21 years in group IIA vs 5.87 ± 2.67 years in group IIB, P = .619).

Table 1.

Clinical and Laboratory Data of All the Participants.

Varibales	Group I (n = 45)	Group II (n = 90)		F	P value
Varibales	Group I (n = 45)	Group IIA	Group IIB	F	P value
Age (year)	43.16 ± 11.88	44.47 ± 11.04	46.62 ± 8	1.27	.286
Sex (male/female)	22/23	23/22	24/21	χ² = .18	.915
BMI (kg/m²)	24.56 ± 3.26	26.43 ± 4.32	25.48 ± 4.64	2.32	.102
Hemoglobin (g/dl)	12.4 ± 3.3	10.9 ± 1.7	10.7 ± 1.8	6.85	<.001^a,b
Calcium (md/dl)	9.41 ± 0.54	8.44 ± 0.88	8.16 ± 0.89	30.96	<.001^a,b
Phosphorus (mg/dl)	3.27 ± 0.44	4.47 ± 1.39	4.94 ± 1.37	25.01	<.001^a,b
Parathyroid hormone (pg/ml)	40.62 ± 7.81	279.91± 42.02	263.38 ± 47.87	586.13	<.001^a,b
Albumin (g/l)	41.39 ± 2.79	39.96 ± 1.01	40.73 ± 1.76	17.78	<.001^a,b
Urea (mg/dl)	23.44 ± 4.39	114.96 ± 11.28	109.93 ± 16.39	860.3	<.0001^a,b
Creatinine (mg/dl)	0.73 ± .09	8.08 ± 2.09	7.46 ± 1.35	358.69	<.0001^a,b
IS (ng/ml)	0.25 ± 0.44	2.18 ± 0.67	0.71 ± 0.27	20.38	<.001^a,b,c

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IS, indoxyl sulfate; Group I, control group; Group IIA, uremic patients pruritus; Group IIB, uremic patients without pruritus; Group C, normal controls.

Group I versus Group IIA.

Group I versus Group IIB.

Group IIA versus Group IIB.

The results of the study showed significant elevations of phosphors, parathyroid hormone, urea, creatinine, and IS, concurrently with significant decreases of hemoglobin and albumin in uremic patients than in control (Table 1). Furthermore, uremic patients with pruritus had a significantly increased serum level of IS (P < .001; Table 1). Using linear regression models for the patient with renal failure with or without pruritus for predication of pruritus, 8 different models are achieved. IS was the significant independent biomarker of the development of pruritus in uremic patients (Table 2).

Table 2.

Coefficients of the Linear Regression Model for Patients With Renal Failure With or Without Pruritus.

Model	(Constant)	−3.644	3.691		−0.987	0.328
	IS	−0.001	0.000	−1.079	−3.823	<0.001
	VAS score	1.092	0.179	1.665	6.117	<0.001
	Blood urea	0.007	0.005	0.131	1.242	0.220
	Creatinine	−0.025	0.056	−0.048	−0.447	0.657
	Calcium	0.133	0.139	0.092	0.960	0.342
	Albumin	0.053	0.071	0.080	0.740	0.463
	PTH	0.022	0.014	0.137	1.500	0.140
	Phosphorus	−0.470	0.248	−0.182	−1.891	0.064

Abbreviations: IS, indoxyl sulfate; PTH, parathyroid hormone; VAS, visual analog scale.

P ≤ .05 is significant.

Regarding pruritus severity, 25 patients had severe pruritus, 15 patients had moderate pruritus, and 5 patients had mild pruritus. The effect of hemodialysis on pruritus was varied in group IIA, as 30 patients did not experience any difference before or after the hemodialysis sessions, 8 patients had a transient relief of pruritus after the hemodialysis session, and 7 patients had a temporary exacerbation after the hemodialysis session.

The result of this study showed that the effect of pruritus on quality of life was extremely impacted in 5 patients, a very large impact on 11 patients, a moderate impact on 16 patients, a small impact on 8 patients, and no or little impact on 5 patients.

The statistical analysis of the laboratory data showed a significant correlation between serum level of IS and pruritus severity (r = .92, P < .001; Table 3).

Table 3.

Correlation Between Laboratory Data and Pruritus Severity in Uremic Patients With Pruritus.

Variables	Correlation coefficient (r)	P value
Hemoglobin	.047	.71
IS	.920	<.001
Urea	.059	.65
Creatinine	.037	.78
Albumin	−.098	.52
Calcium	.076	.57
Phosphorus	.093	.48
PTH	.035	.9

Abbreviations: IS, indoxyl sulfate; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

P ≤ .05 is significant.

In the results that showed after 2 months of activated charcoal usage, there was a significant decrease in the serum level of IS (P < .001). In addition, there was a significant decrease in pruritus severity (P < .001) and a significant decrease in DLQI (P = .032; Table 4).

Table 4.

Comparison Between Serum Level of IS, VAS Score, and DLQI in Patients in Group IIA Before and After 2 months of Activated Charcoal Usage.

Variable	Before	After	Test	P value
IS (ng/ml)	2.18 ± 0.67	1.03 ± 1.01	t = 6.365	<.001
VAS score
No	0	7	χ² = 33.68	<.001
Mild	5	23
Moderate	15	12
Severe	25	3
DLQI score
No or little	5	13	χ² = 10.53	.032
Small	8	15
Moderate	16	8
Large	11	7
Extreme	5	2

Abbreviations: DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; IS, indoxyl sulfate; VAS, visual analog scale.

P ≤ .05 is significant.

During the treatment period, 3 patients in group IIA complained of transient mild diarrhea for 2 days after initiation of the activated charcoal that resolved spontaneously. No other serious side effects were noted during the period of treatment. None of the patients were dropped during the study.

Discussion

In the present study, results demonstrated the elevation of IS in uremic patients with a positive correlation with pruritus severity. Furthermore, results showed the negative impact of uremic pruritus on the quality of life of patients.

Pruritus associated with ESRD remains an unsolved problem.¹⁷ Still, many physicians underestimate this distressing complaint.^18,19 Several etiological factors had been investigated including xerosis, immunological factors, neurological changes, and endocrinal disturbance.²⁰

Many of the accumulative uremic toxins, like IS, formed from gut microbes and represent an inter-organismal crosstalk.^21,22 Gut dysbiosis (increased number of anaerobic bacteria secondary to increased intestinal urea excretion) is a characteristic in patients with ESRD,²³ resulting in increased production of toxic metabolites such as IS.²⁴ This accumulation cannot be avoided by regular hemodialysis.²⁵

To decrease serum IS levels, 3 main pathways are studied. The first pathway is to increase the effectiveness of dialysis such as modification of dialysis technique,^26,27 and adding water-soluble adsorbent,^28,29 but these procedures may be accompanied by protein loss and mortality risk.³⁰

The second pathway is to decrease IS production. Change in gut microbes was investigated using prebiotic, probiotic, or symbiotic, however; the resulting data are unsettled.^31,32

The third pathway is to decrease IS intestinal absorption. The addition of activated charcoal as an adsorbent agent has been evaluated in uremic patients, especially AST-120 (KREMEZIN^®). A lot of studies demonstrated the effectiveness of AST-120 in improving ESRD-related disorders but not the restoration of renal function.^33,34 However, AST-120 is not worldwide available, and the high dose needed daily (20-30 piles/day) limits its use.³⁵

Activated charcoal is an easily available drug and less costly than AST-120 ($10 vs $349). Two previous studies showed the benefit of activated charcoal in the amelioration of uremic pruritus in a small number of patients, without an explanation for this action.^36,37 In the present study, the usage of activated charcoal resulted in decreasing pruritus severity, combined with decreasing IS and improving the quality of life of patients without serious side effects.

The role of IS in pruritus is not fully explained. IS can activate and upregulate several meditators involved in itching such as protease-activated receptor-2,^38-40 cannabinoid receptor type 1,^41,42 NLRP3 Inflammasome,^43,44 endothelin-1,^45,46 signal transducer and activator of transcription 3,^47,48 astrocyte activity,^49,50 NADPH oxidase,^51,52 transient receptor potential vanilloid 1,^53,54 Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1),^55,56 Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β),^57,58 and macrophage.^59,60 In addition, IS can downregulate anti-itching mediators such as nuclear factor E2-related factor 2.^61,62 Also, IS is a neurotoxin and can initiate neuroinflammation and induce cognitive impairment and behavioral abnormality,^63-67 which can exacerbate itching.^68,69 All these mediators contribute to non-histamine-induced itching.⁷⁰

The results of this study showed that marked improvement of pruritus is accompanied by improved quality of life of patients. Many uremic patients with pruritus suffer from sleep disturbance, poor dialysis and treatment adherence, infection, depression, and increased mortality risk.⁷¹ None of the uremic patients dropped out during the study. The improvement in quality of life increases the patient’s adherence to the dialysis session and decreases the mortality risk.⁷² Meanwhile, a minority of the patients in this study remain complaint of pruritus. This can be explained by higher doses of activated charcoal or longer periods of treatment are needed to achieve marked improvement of relief of pruritus. Moreover, these patients had xerosis and needed skin moisture.

Conclusions

IS is elevated in uremic patients with pruritus. This elevation is correlated with the severity of pruritus. Treatment with activated charcoal results in improvement of decreasing serum level of IS, improvement of pruritus, and quality of life of patients.

Limitations

This is a single-center-based study. No placebo drug was used in this study and a large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

EMA and OHA: Conception and design of the study. EMA, JME, AAE, NHM, and OHA: Analysis of data. JME, NHM, AMM, and AEM: Interpretation of data. EMA, NHM, and AEM: Drafting the article. JME and NHM: Revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors: The final approval of the manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Essam Mohamed Akl

References

Makar

Smyth

Brennan

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: a review. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2021;46(6):659-669.

Trachtenberg

Collister

Rigatto

Recent advances in the treatment of uremic pruritus. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020;29(5):465-470.

Welz-Kubiak

Reszke

Szepietowski

JC.

Pruritus as a sign of systemic disease. Clin Dermatol. 2019;37(6):644-656.

Świerczyńska

Białynicki-Birula

Szepietowski

JC.

Chronic intractable pruritus in chronic kidney disease patients: prevalence, impact, and management challenges: a narrative review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021;17:1267-1282.

Martin

Clotet-Freixas

Farragher

Hundemer

GL.

Have we just scratched the surface? A narrative review of uremic pruritus in 2020. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020;7:2054358120954024.

Rayner

Larkina

Wang

, et al. International comparisons of prevalence, awareness, and treatment of pruritus in people on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(12):2000-2007.

Cabrera

Hansson

Kliger

Finkelstein

FO.

Symptom management of the patient with CKD: the role of dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(4):687-693.

Hobby

Karaduta

Dusio

Singh

Zybailov

Arthur

JM.

Chronic kidney disease and the gut microbiome. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;316(6):F1211-F1217.

Chi

Wang

, et al. The immunomodulatory effect of the gut microbiota in kidney disease. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:5516035.

10.

Tan

Cao

Zou

, et al. Indoxyl sulfate, a valuable biomarker in chronic kidney disease and dialysis. Hemodial Int. 2017;21(2):161-167.

11.

Takkavatakarn

Wuttiputinun

Phannajit

Praditpornsilpa

Eiam-Ong

Susantitaphong

Protein-bound uremic toxin lowering strategies in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol. 2021;34(6):1805-1817.

12.

Reich

Heisig

Phan

, et al. Visual analogue scale: evaluation of the instrument for the assessment of pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92(5):497-501.

13.

Nofal

Farag

Nofal

Eldesouky

Alkot

Abdelkhalik

Gabapentin: a promising therapy for uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients: a randomized-controlled trial and review of literature. J Dermatolog Treat. 2016;27(6):515-519.

14.

Finlay

Khan

GK.

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19(3):210-216.

15.

Fawzy

Hegazy

RA.

Impact of vitiligo on the health-related quality of life of 104 adult patients, using Dermatology Life Quality Index and stress score: first Egyptian report. Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23(5):733-734.

16.

Basra

Salek

Camilleri

Sturkey

Finlay

AY.

Determining the minimal clinically important difference and responsiveness of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): further data. Dermatology. 2015;230(1):27-33.

17.

Manenti

Leuci

Do you feel itchy? A guide towards diagnosis and measurement of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus in dialysis patients. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(Suppl 3):i8-i15.

18.

Weisshaar

Matterne

Mettang

How do nephrologists in haemodialysis units consider the symptom of itch? Results of a survey in Germany. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(4):1328-1330.

19.

Santos-Alonso

Maldonado Martín

Sánchez Villanueva

, et al. Pruritus in dialysis patients. Review and new perspectives. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2022;42(1):15-21.

20.

Bolanos

Pham

Mair

Meyer

Sirich

TL.

Metabolomic analysis of uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246765.

21.

Evenepoel

Poesen

Meijers

The gut-kidney axis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32(11):2005-2014.

22.

Lowenstein

Nigam

SK.

Uremic toxins in organ crosstalk. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:592602.

23.

Chen

, et al. Microbiome-metabolome reveals the contribution of gut-kidney axis on kidney disease. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):5.

24.

Kanbay

Onal

Afsar

, et al. The crosstalk of gut microbiota and chronic kidney disease: role of inflammation, proteinuria, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(8):1453-1466.

25.

Lin

Chiu

, et al. The relationship of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate with target cardiovascular proteins in hemodialysis patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3786.

26.

Böhringer

Jankowski

Gajjala

Zidek

Jankowski

Release of uremic retention solutes from protein binding by hypertonic predilution hemodiafiltration. ASAIO J. 2015;61(1):55-60.

27.

Lima

Guedes

Rodrigues

, et al. High-volume hemodiafiltration decreases the pre-dialysis concentrations of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate compared to hemodialysis: a post-hoc analysis from the HDFit randomized controlled trial. J Nephrol. 2022;35(5):1449-1456.

28.

Shi

Wang

, et al. Increasing the removal of protein-bound uremic toxins by liposome-supported hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 2019;43(5):490-503.

29.

Madero

Cano

Campos

, et al. Removal of protein-bound uremic toxins during hemodialysis using a binding competitor. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(3):394-402.

30.

Ward

Beck

Bernardo

Alves

Stenvinkel

Lindholm

Hypoalbuminemia: a price worth paying for improved dialytic removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins?

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(6):901-907.

31.

McFarlane

Ramos

Johnson

Campbell

KL.

Prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic supplementation in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ren Nutr. 2019;29(3):209-220.

32.

Chen

Shi

Effects of microbiota-driven therapy on circulating indoxyl sulfate and P-cresyl sulfate in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(4):1267-1278.

33.

Asai

Kumakura

Kikuchi

Review of the efficacy of AST-120 (KREMEZIN^®) on renal function in chronic kidney disease patients. Ren Fail. 2019;41(1):47-56.

34.

Schulman

Berl

Beck

, et al. Risk factors for progression of chronic kidney disease in the EPPIC trials and the effect of AST-120. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22(2):299-308.

35.

Cupisti

Piccoli

Gallieni

Charcoal for the management of pruritus and uremic toxins in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2020;29(1):71-79.

36.

Pederson

Matter

Czerwinski

Llach

Relief of idiopathic generalized pruritus in dialysis patients treated with activated oral charcoal. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(3):446-448.

37.

Giovannetti

Barsotti

Cupisti

, et al. Oral activated charcoal in patients with uremic pruritus. Nephron. 1995;70(2):193-196.

38.

Kim

Zhang

Cho

Kim

Park

Moon

SJ.

Uremic solutes of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol enhance protease-activated receptor-2 expression in vitro and in vivo in keratinocytes. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2021;40(1):113-123.

39.

Steinhoff

Neisius

Ikoma

, et al. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 mediates itch: a novel pathway for pruritus in human skin. J Neurosci. 2003;23(15):6176-6180.

40.

Rattenholl

Steinhoff

Proteinase-activated receptor-2 in the skin: receptor expression, activation and function during health and disease. Drug News Perspect. 2008;21(7):369-381.

41.

Hsu

Chang

, et al. Indoxyl sulfate upregulates the cannabinoid type 1 receptor gene via an ATF3/c-Jun complex-mediated signaling pathway in the model of uremic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2018;252:128-135.

42.

Campora

Miragliotta

Ricci

, et al. Cannabinoid receptor type 1 and 2 expression in the skin of healthy dogs and dogs with atopic dermatitis. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73(7):988-995.

43.

Yamaguchi

Yisireyili

Goto

, et al. Indoxyl sulfate activates NLRP3 inflammasome to induce cardiac contractile dysfunction accompanied by myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2022;22(4):365-377.

44.

Zheng

Yao

Zhou

, et al. A novel function of NLRP3 independent of inflammasome as a key transcription factor of IL-33 in epithelial cells of atopic dermatitis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(10):871.

45.

Taguchi

Kobayashi

Indoxyl sulfate enhances endothelin-1-induced contraction via impairment of NO/cGMP signaling in rat aorta [published correction appears in Pflugers Arch. 2021 Jun 17]. Pflugers Arch. 2021;473(8):1247-1259.

46.

Tsybikov

Petrisheva

Kuznik

Magen

Plasma endothelin-1 levels during exacerbation of atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36(4):320-324.

47.

Shimizu

Yisireyili

Nishijima

Niwa

Stat3 contributes to indoxyl sulfate-induced inflammatory and fibrotic gene expression and cellular senescence. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(2):184-189.

48.

Shiratori-Hayashi

Koga

Tozaki-Saitoh

, et al. STAT3-dependent reactive astrogliosis in the spinal dorsal horn underlies chronic itch. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):927-931.

49.

Rothhammer

Mascanfroni

Bunse

, et al. Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat Med. 2016;22(6):586-597.

50.

Tsuda

Spinal dorsal horn astrocytes: new players in chronic itch. Allergol Int. 2017;66(1):31-35.

51.

Tanaka

Watanabe

Nakano

, et al. Indoxyl sulfate contributes to adipose tissue inflammation through the activation of NADPH oxidase. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(8):502.

52.

Emmert

Fonfara

Rodriguez

Weidinger

NADPH oxidase inhibition rescues keratinocytes from elevated oxidative stress in a 2D atopic dermatitis and psoriasis model. Exp Dermatol. 2020;29(8):749-758.

53.

Liao

MC.

TRPV1 hyperfunction involved in uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate-mediated renal tubular damage. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17):6212.

54.

Xie

XY.

Inflammatory mediators causing cutaneous chronic itch in some diseases via transient receptor potential channel subfamily V member 1 and subfamily A member 1. J Dermatol. 2019;46(3):177-185.

55.

Tumur

Shimizu

Enomoto

Miyazaki

Niwa

Indoxyl sulfate upregulates expression of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 by oxidative stress-induced NF-kappaB activation. Am J Nephrol. 2010;31(5):435-441.

56.

Engelhart

El Hindi

Biesalski

Pfitzner

In vitro reproduction of clinical hallmarks of eczematous dermatitis in organotypic skin models. Arch Dermatol Res. 2005;297(1):1-9.

57.

Saito

Shimizu

Yisireyili

Nishijima

Enomoto

Niwa

Indoxyl sulfate-induced activation of (pro)renin receptor is involved in expression of TGF-β1 and α-smooth muscle actin in proximal tubular cells. Endocrinology. 2014;155(5):1899-1907.

58.

Zanvit

, et al. The Cytokine TGF-β Induces Interleukin-31 Expression from Dermal Dendritic Cells to Activate Sensory Neurons and Stimulate Wound Itching. Immunity. 2020;53(2):371-383.e5

59.

Yan

Wang

Yan

Chen

Uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate promotes proinflammatory macrophage activation by regulation of β-catenin and YAP pathways. J Mol Histol. 2021;52(2):197-205.

60.

Kasraie

Werfel

Role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:942375.

61.

Bolati

Shimizu

Yisireyili

Nishijima

Niwa

Indoxyl sulfate, a uremic toxin, downregulates renal expression of Nrf2 through activation of NF-κB. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:56

62.

Furue

Regulation of skin barrier function via competition between AHR axis versus IL-13/IL-4‒JAK‒STAT6/STAT3 axis: pathogenic and therapeutic implications in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3741.

63.

Liabeuf

Pepin

Franssen

CFM

, et al. Chronic kidney disease and neurological disorders: are uraemic toxins the missing piece of the puzzle? [published correction appears in Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Jul 26;37(8):1589]. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;37(Suppl 2):ii33-ii44.

64.

Adesso

Paterniti

Cuzzocrea

, et al. AST-120 reduces neuroinflammation induced by indoxyl sulfate in glial cells. J Clin Med. 2018;7(10):365.

65.

Brydges

Fiehn

Mayberg

, et al. Indoxyl sulfate, a gut microbiome-derived uremic toxin, is associated with psychic anxiety and its functional magnetic resonance imaging-based neurologic signature. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21011.

66.

Kim

Gil

HW.

Emotional and cognitive changes in chronic kidney disease. Korean J Intern Med. 2022;37(3):489-501.

67.

Sun

Wang

, et al. Indoxyl sulfate caused behavioral abnormality and neurodegeneration in mice with unilateral nephrectomy. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(5):6681-6701.

68.

Stumpf

Schneider

Ständer

Psychosomatic and psychiatric disorders and psychologic factors in pruritus. Clin Dermatol. 2018;36(6):704-708.

69.

Choi

Di Nardo

Skin neurogenic inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. 2018;40(3):249-259.

70.

Agelopoulos

Pereira

Wiegmann

Ständer

Cutaneous neuroimmune crosstalk in pruritus. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28(6):452-462.

71.

Kim

Pollock

Epidemiology and burden of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(Suppl 3):i1-i7.

72.

Alikari

Matziou

Tsironi

, et al. Patient knowledge, adherence to the therapeutic regimen, and quality of life in hemodialysis : knowledge, adherence, and quality of life in hemodialysis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1337:259-272.

Does Indoxyl Sulfate Have a Role in Uremic Pruritus? A Laboratory and Interventional Study

Abstract

Background:

Objectives:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Aim of the Study

Type of the Study

Subjects and Methods

Ethical Approval

Subjects

Methods

Activated Charcoal

Laboratory Investigations

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Limitations

Footnotes

Author Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References