Abstract

Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a cornerstone in the management of cancer. Skin toxicities are the most common immune-related adverse event (irAE).1 As summarized by Muntyanu,2 cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs) are diseases that dermatologists diagnose and manage daily. The article highlights that we lack data demonstrating the most appropriate treatments of these toxicities that do not inhibit the anti-cancer effect.
Medical oncology guidelines generally recommend the use of systemic corticosteroids (sCSs) for grade 2 or 3 cirAEs.3-5 However, the mechanism of ICI anti-cancer effect is to activate the immune system, whereas sCSs are immunosuppressive. Earlier evidence suggested that sCSs do not prevent anti-cancer effects.6,7 However, these studies compare those experiencing irAEs to those who do not. Studies have demonstrated that patients experiencing irAEs have increased progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).8,9 Further, high-dose sCSs for immune-related hypophysitis worsen PFS and OS.10 There is also direct evidence that use of sCS negatively impacts the ICI treatment effect.11, 12
In many cirAE presentations, there are alternatives to sCSs as summarized by Muntyanu. Therefore, management of cirAEs without sCS should be considered, especially for disorders with suitable alternatives.
References available online via Supplemental Material.
Supplemental Material
Online supplementary file 1 - Supplemental material for Reader Comment Regarding “Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Dermatology Perspective on Management”
Supplemental material, Online supplementary file 1, for Reader Comment Regarding “Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Dermatology Perspective on Management” by Maxwell Sauder and Marcus Butler in Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Maxwell Sauder Relevant Disclosures: Consulting/Advisory Boards: Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen, La Roche Posay, Look Good Feel Better, Oncology Education, Merk, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Save Your Skin Foundation, Sun Pharma
Research: Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Senhwa Biosciences
Marcus Butler Relevant Disclosures: Advisory Boards: Merck, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Novartis, Immunocore, Adpatimmune, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Genzyme, Sanofi, La Roche Posay, Sun Pharma, Instil Bio, IOVANCE, Pfizer
Grants: Merck, Takara Bio, Novartis
Safety Review Committee: Adaptimmune, GlaxoSmithKline.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
