LopushinskyKM.GillN.SheaWK.ElliottJF.StraubeS.DytocMT. Making glove decision less of a white knuckling experience: a systematic review and inventory of glove accelerator contents. J Cutan Med Surg. 2020;24(4):386-398.doi:10.1177/1203475420919398http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316756
2.
KershAE.HelmsS.de la FeldS. Glove-related allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2018;29(1):13-21.doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000335http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29901500
3.
CashmanMW.ReutemannPA.EhrlichA. Contact dermatitis in the United States: epidemiology, economic impact, and workplace prevention. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):87-98.doi:10.1016/j.det.2011.08.004http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117870
4.
CaoLY.TaylorJS.SoodA.MurrayD.SiegelPD. Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves: changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(9):1001-1007.doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.219http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20855699
5.
SiegelPD.FowlerJF.StorrsFJet al. Allergen content of patient problem and nonproblem gloves: relationship to allergen-specific patch-test findings. Dermatitis. 2010;21(2):77-83.doi:10.2310/6620.2010.09088http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20233545
