Abstract
Variants in the Glucokinase Regulator (GCKR) gene are increasingly being detected with growing applications of genomic sequencing technologies. Despite the crucial roles of the GCKR gene in energy homeostasis, the clinical applications of GCKR variants are currently limited. We observed that a large proportion of GCKR variants that are available in gnomAD database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) lacked adequate evidence of pathogenicity or benign impact. We highlight the clinical need for an improved understanding of GCKR variants by presenting 2 compelling cases of unrelated families (3 individuals in total) who harbor rare GCKR variants in the context of cornea arcus and hyperlipidemia. Our observations underscore the burgeoning need for functional as well as family segregation studies to facilitate the clinical applications of GCKR variants.
Plain Language Summary
The Glucokinase Regulator gene plays important roles in energy balance and cardiovascular disease risk. With increasing applications of genetic testing technologies, variants in the Glucokinase Regulator gene are increasingly being uncovered. There is a growing clinical need for an improved understanding of variants in the Glucokinase Regulator gene. We present the clinical history and findings from two unrelated patients as well as a pie chart that draws upon publicly available record of Glucokinase. Regulator gene variants to highlight this necessity.
Introduction
Encoded by the Glucokinase Regulator (GCKR) at 2p23.3, 1 glucokinase regulatory protein (GKRP) plays important roles in energy and cardiovascular homeostasis.2 -4 The GCKR gene functions as the regulatory inhibitor of hepatic glucokinase (GCK), a key post-prandial glucose sensor. By modulating hepatic glucose uptake in response to nutritional state and cellular energy balance, the GCKR exerts a critical influence on systemic glucose and energy homeostasis. 5 Accordingly, genetic variation in the GCKR gene affects both glucose and lipid metabolism and is associated with a spectrum of metabolic phenotypes, including hypertriglyceridemia, broader dyslipidemia, altered fasting glucose regulation, increased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus, hepatic steatosis and elevated cardiometabolic disease risk.6,7
As GCKR variants are being increasingly associated with dyslipidemia,6,8 -11 the need for functional studies continues to rise. Functional studies using cell models, structural modeling, and fluorescent localization, have shown that GCKR variants can impair nuclear retention of GCK or disturb inhibition even without affecting localization.6,10 GCKR variants have also been associated with gout, 12 type 2 diabetes mellitus, 13 fatty liver disease, 11 and coronary artery disease. 14 GCKR polymorphisms may have complex multifactorial inheritance patterns, yet the possibilities of Mendelian risk transmission for rare GCKR variants remain (Mendelian Inheritance in Man [MIM] 15 # 613463). To exemplify the growing clinical need for functional studies for rare GCKR variants, we present the clinical synopsis of 2 unrelated families (3 patients [2 females and 1 male] in total) with rare GCKR variants in the context of cornea arcus and hyperlipidemia.
Case Description
Individual 1, a 41-year-old woman underwent hyperlipidemia gene panel testing due to the clinical finding of corneal arcus and dyslipidemia. She has no known personal history of diabetes mellitus or hepatic steatosis or coronary artery disease or gout. Her family history includes hyperlipidemia in multiple first and second-degree relatives. The test identified a heterozygous variant, GCKR (NM_001486.3) c.1639 C>A p.(P547T). Although the c.1639 C>A variant was previously reported in another patient with hyperlipidemia 9 and is deemed to be rare (with gnomAD allele frequency of 0.0002), the variant is yet to fulfill the clinical criteria for classification as a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) Mendelian gene variant stratification framework 16 and is classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Even though cornea arcus has been associated with hereditary causes of hyperlipidemia, 17 this is the first reported case of cornea arcus in a patient with a GCKR variant.
Individual 2, a 70-year-old woman underwent whole genome sequencing in the context of her history of multisystemic illnesses including hyperlipidemia, migraine, bilateral cataracts, supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation (requiring ablation and external cardioversion), vertebra hemangioma, osteoporosis, enchondromas, obstructive sleep apnea and diverticulosis. She had no known history of impaired glucose metabolism, gout/hyperuricemia, fatty liver disease, or coronary artery disease. Additionally, she reported a family history of early-onset hyperlipidemia in first-degree relatives, including her brother, her father, and her son (Individual 3). Individual 2’s lipid profile reported here in Table 1 are in the context of longstanding (several decades) pharmacotherapy with statins and dietary management. Genome sequencing revealed a heterozygous variant, GCKR (NM_001486.4) c.1135dup (p.Thr379Asnfs*36), amongst other variants. Classified as a VUS (with gnomAD allele frequency of 0.001 and global minor allele frequency of frequency [GMAF] 0.00060 [ClinVar Variation ID: 932562]), GCKR c.1135dup was the only variant identified by whole genome sequencing that could reasonably account for her longstanding dyslipidemia, which has been present since early adulthood. GCKR c.1135dup is predicted to cause premature protein truncation (due to a frameshift) and misfolding as well as abnormal protein trafficking. 10 GCKR c.1135dup was previously reported in patients with hyperlipidemia.8,10 We reviewed gnomAD database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) on July 28, 2025, for GCKR variants and noticed that a large proportion (Figure 1 and Supplemental Table 1) of GCKR variants lacked adequate evidence of pathogenicity or benign impact.
Phenotypic Comparison of 3 Patients with Monoallelic GCKR Variants.
Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
The asterisk (*) indicates that Individual 2 has been on longstanding therapy (statins) for hyperlipidemia. Individual 2’s lipid profile reported here in Table 1 are in the context of longstanding (several decades) pharmacotherapy with statins and dietary management.

Distribution of GCKR variants that were present in the gnomAD database on July 28, 2025.
Individual 3, a 48-year-old man with a history of dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, hypogonadism, and osteoarthritis, underwent family variant testing for the GCKR (NM_001486.4) c.1135dup (p.Thr379Asnfs*36) variant in the context of his mother’s (Individual 2) history. At the time of the study, Individuals 1 and 3 were transitioning to pharmacotherapy following prior attempts at dietary management. All 3 individuals reported maintaining an active lifestyle with regular exercise.
Discussion
Considering that VUS cannot be used for clinical purposes (to distinguish individuals at risk or to determine therapeutic options), these clinical cases and the review of GCKR variants in gnomAD database highlight the growing need for additional evidence base (potentially via functional biochemical studies and clinical case series as well as case-control studies) to facilitate the VUS resolution processes to help translate the growing knowledge of GCKR variants to benefit patient care. Given the growing applications of genetic sequencing technologies and the crucial role of GCKR in energy homeostasis, an improved understanding of known GCKR variants is critically needed. It is also noteworthy that all 3 individuals described in this report exhibited borderline low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), aligning with previous studies suggesting that GCKR variation may influence renal function. 18
It is pertinent to note the role of crucial roles estrogen in hepatic lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and VLDL secretion, and that these factors may influence lipid phenotypes in female patients. 19 It is currently unclear whether gender-based differences in metabolic traits may exist in individuals with GCKR variation. Although some population-based studies suggest sex-dependent lipid effects, the evidence remains limited. 20
Conclusion
This study highlights the growing clinical need for an improved understanding of GCKR variants. Functional as well as family segregation studies that can help facilitate the clinical applications of GCKR variants are increasingly warranted.
Supplemental Material
sj-xlsx-1-end-10.1177_11795514261441435 – Supplemental material for Cornea Arcus and Dyslipidemia in Unrelated Adults With Monoallelic Germline Variants in the Glucokinase Regulator Gene
Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-1-end-10.1177_11795514261441435 for Cornea Arcus and Dyslipidemia in Unrelated Adults With Monoallelic Germline Variants in the Glucokinase Regulator Gene by Bukola A. Olarewaju, Ileana Trujillo and Mayowa A. Osundiji in Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients and families whose participation made this project possible, and the many healthcare providers involved in their care.
Ethical Considerations
This study was deemed to be exempt from review by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.
Consent to Participate
Informed written consent was obtained from the patients for the study. Informed written consent was obtained from the patients for publication.
Author Contributions
Bukola A Olarewaju: Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing. Ileana Trujillo: Investigation; Methodology; Writing – review & editing. Mayowa A. Osundiji: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Supervision; Validation; Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
CARE Guideline Adherence Statement
This case report was prepared in accordance with the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
