We need valid research to document the extent and nature of oppression faced by American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian people. Survey research is useful toward this goal because it enables the collection of data from a large number of participants. Yet, there are many barriers faced when undertaking survey research, especially with American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian populations. One of these barriers is self-indigenization, which can result in falsification of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian identities and thus invalid samples. In this article, we describe the nature and extent of self-indigenization that we faced when attempting to secure a valid sample of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian participants. We then review strategies and make recommendations to improve the validity of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian survey samples. As the first study to address the challenges of self-indigenization in online survey research, our contribution is both empirical and methodological. Ultimately, better survey research with American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian populations requires all parties to uphold Indigenous Data Sovereignty.
CarrollS.GarbaI.Figueroa-RodriguezO. L.HolbrookJ.LovettR.MaterecheraS.ParsonsM.RaserokaK.Rodriguez-LonebearD.RoweR.SaraR.WalkerJ. D.AndersonJ.HudsonM. (2020). The CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19, 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
4.
CoatesJ. M. (2013). “This sovereignty thing”: Nationality, blood, and the Cherokee resurgence. In ForteM. C. (Ed.), Who is an Indian? Race, place, and the politics of Indigeneity in the Americas (pp. 124–150). University of Toronto.
DaiJ. D.YellowtailJ. L.Munoz-SalgadoA.LopezJ. J.Ward-GriffinE.Echo HawkC.LeBlancJ.SantosN.FareroA.EasonA. E.FrybergS. A. (2023). We are still here: Omission and perceived discrimination galvanized civic engagement among Native Americans. Psychological Science, 34(7), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231165271
7.
DaleyS. M.DaleyC. M. (2023). The complexities of American Indian identity in the twenty-first century. Lexington.
8.
Davis-DelanoL. R.StrotherS. L.GoneJ. P. (2022). Perceived indicators of American Indian identity in everyday interaction: Navigating settler-colonial erasure. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(11), 2025–2048. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1992468
9.
EppersonA. E.ProchaskaJ. J. (2023). Native owned and grown or demeaning and offensive? American Indian adults’ perspectives on Natural American Spirit branded cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 32, 393–396. https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/32/3/393
FrybergS. A.EasonA. E.BradyL. M.JessopN.LopezJ. J. (2021). Unpacking the mascot debate: Native American identification predicts opposition to Native mascots. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619898556
12.
GarroutteE. M. (2003). Real Indians: Identity and survival of Native America. University of California.
13.
Gilio-WhitakerD. (2024). Indigeneity, nationhood, racialization, and the U.S. settler state: Why political status matters to Native “identity” formation. Genealogy, 8(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8030116
14.
GaudryA. (2018). Communing with the dead: The “new Métis,” Métis identity appropriation, and the displacement of living Métis culture. American Indian Quarterly, 42(2), 162–190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5250/amerindiquar.42.2.0162
HerrickR.MendezJ. M.PriorB.DavisJ. A. (2019). Surveying American Indians with opt-in internet surveys. American Indian Quarterly, 43(3), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.43.3.0281
LerouxD. (2019). Distorted descent: White claims to Indigenous identity. University of Manitoba.
23.
LerouxD. (2023). State recognition and the dangers of race shifting: The case of Vermont. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 46(2), 53–84. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.46.2.leroux
24.
LieblerC. A.BhaskarR.PorterS. R. (2016). Joining, leaving, and staying in the American Indian/Alaska Native race category between 2000 and 2010. Demography, 53(2), 507–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0461-2
25.
LieblerC. A.ZacherM. (2013). American Indians without tribes in the twenty-first century. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(11), 1910–1934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2012.692800
26.
LopezJ. D.LuceroD. D. (2020). Measuring Indigenous identity with Indigenous communities. In HuamanE. S.MartinN. D. (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge systems and research methodologies: Local solutions and global opportunities (pp. 293–311). Canadian Scholars.
27.
McKayD. L. (2021). Real Indians: Policing or protecting authentic Indigenous identity?Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218821450
PewewardyC. D. (2004). So you think you hired an “Indian” faculty member? The ethnic fraud paradox in higher education. In MihesuahD. A.WilsonA. C. (Eds.), Indigenizing the academy: Transforming scholarship and empowering communities (pp. 200–217). University of Nebraska.
30.
Rodriguez-LonebearD. (2016). Building a data revolution in Indian Country. In KukutaiT.TaylorJ. (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (Vol. 38, pp. 253–272). ANU.
31.
Rodriguez-LonebearD. (2021). The blood line: Racialized boundary making and citizenship among Native nations. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7(4), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220981589
32.
SanchezG. R.FoxworthR. (2022). Social justice and Native American political engagement: Evidence from the 2020 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 86(S1), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfac020
33.
Small-RodriguezD.Rocha BeardallT. (2021). Tribal sovereignty and the limits of race for American Indians. In WalterM.KukutaiT.GonzalesA. A.HenryR. (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous sociology (pp. 321–334). Oxford University.
34.
TallbearK. (2013). Native American DNA: Tribal belonging and the false promise of genetic science. University of Minnesota.
