Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examines the leadership practices of the Xinka people, an Indigenous group in southern Guatemala, with the goal of contributing to understanding how their cultural values influence leadership behaviors. Through a constructivist grounded theory approach, this research involved 20 interviews with Xinka leaders from various communities in Guatemala. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methods, including open, axial, and selective coding, to develop a conceptual model of Xinka leadership practices. Key practices identified include an emphasis on walking with knowledge, honoring relational worlds, and walking for the people. These practices highlight the leaders’ roles in maintaining cultural heritage and navigating contemporary challenges. By situating leadership within the Xinka’s lived realities, this study advances Indigenous leadership scholarship and underscores the need for culturally rooted, practice-based models. Future research could explore the applicability of the leadership-as-practice model to other Indigenous contexts, deepening the understanding of leadership in diverse cultural landscapes.

Keywords

Guatemala Indigenous leadership Indigenous studies leadership practices resilience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar-Støen

Sveinsdóttir

A. G.

(2022). Punching above their weight: Opposition to mining and Xinka politics in Guatemala. Geoforum, 148, 103661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.11.003

Ary

Jacobs

L. C.

Razavieh

Sorensen

C. K.

(2009). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Arzate

M. D. Á

. (2017). Costa Caribe de Nicaragua: Autonomía, interculturalidad, ética y emancipación social [Nicaragua’s Caribbean coast: Autonomy, interculturality, ethics, and social emancipation]. Humanismo Y Cambio Social, 9, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.5377/hcs.v0i9.8217

Aurini

Heath

Howells

(2021). The how-to of qualitative research. SAGE.

Bailey

(2018). “So that all shall know”: Memorialising Guatemala’s disappeared (Order No. 28277355). [Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University]. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/125772

Barbour

R. S.

(2008). Introducing qualitative research: A student’s guide to the craft of doing qualitative research. SAGE.

Bastos

(2017). Multicultural projects in Guatemala: Identity tensions and everyday ideologies. In Kaltmeier

(Ed.) The new dynamics of identity politics in the Americas (pp. 78–95). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085715-5

Bastos

Camus

(2003). Abriendo caminos: Las organizaciones mayas desde el Nobel hasta el presente [Opening paths: Mayan organizations from the Nobel Prize to the present]. FLACSO.

Batz

(2024, September 20). As Guatemalan democracy falters, Indigenous communities stand their ground. North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA). https://nacla.org/guatemalan-democracy-indigenous-plurinational/

10.

Bowen

G. A.

(2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

11.

Bravo

Vázquez

(2019). El liderazgo “mandar obedeciendo” se fundamenta en el sacrificio del hermano mayor [The “Rule through Obeying” leadership is based on the sacrifice of the older brother]. Liminar: Estudios Sociales Y Humanísticos, 18(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.29043/liminar.v18i1.726

12.

Bruchac

(2014). Indigenous knowledge and traditional knowledge. In Smith

(Ed.) Encyclopedia of global archaeology (pp. 3814–3824). Springer. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1172&context=anthro_papers

13.

Carroll

Levy

Richmond

(2008). Leadership as practice: Challenging the competency paradigm. Leadership, 4(4), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008095186

14.

Casado

Gómez

(2010). Liderazgo asociativo o cómo mandar obedeciendo [Associative leadership or how to rule through obeying]. CRAC-ACUDEX.

15.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. SAGE.

16.

Contractor

DeChurch

L. A.

Carson

J. B.

Carter

D. R.

Keegan

(2012). The topology of collective leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 994–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.010

17.

Cope

D. G.

(2014). Methods and meanings: Credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(1), 89–91. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.89-91

18.

Corbin

J. M.

Strauss

A. L.

(2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.

19.

Council of the Xinka People of Guatemala. (n.d.). Agenda estrategica [Xinkas community practices in worldview science technology community organization]. Consejo Coordinador del Pueblo Xinka de Guatemala –COPXIG [Printed by CHOLSAMAJ].

20.

Council of the Xinka People of Guatemala. (2013). Prácticas comunitarias Xinkas en cosmovisión, ciencia y tecnología, y organización comunitaria [strategic agenda]. Consejo Coordinador del Pueblo Xinka de Guatemala –COPXIG [Printed by Programa Maya].

21.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

22.

Dary Fuentes

. (2016). Diagnóstico, situación de la cultura Xinka [Diagnosis, Situation of the Xinka culture]. Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes. Ediciones Maya’ Na’ oj.

23.

Dary Fuentes

Galindo

. (2015). Historia e identidad del pueblo Xinka [History and identity of the Xinka people]. Programa Universitario de Investigación en Cultura, Pensamiento de Identidad de la Sociedad. https://digi.usac.edu.gt/edigi/historia-e-identidad-del-pueblo-xinka.html

24.

Ekern

(2011). The production of autonomy: Leadership and community in Mayan Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies, 43(1), 93–119.

25.

Erlandson

D. A.

Harris

E. L.

Skipper

Allen

S. D.

(1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. SAGE.

26.

Esparza

(2005). Post-war Guatemala: Long-term effects of psychological and ideological militarization of the K’iche Mayans. Journal of Genocide Research, 7(3), 377–391.

27.

Feldman

Worline

(2015). The practicality of practice theory. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15(2), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0356

28.

Flora

C. B.

Emery

Fey

Bregendahl

(2005). Community capitals: A tool for evaluating strategic interventions and projects. North Central Regional Center for Rural Development.

29.

Getz

L. M.

Raftery

J. R.

Tamura

E. H.

(2010). Bridging borders, brokering divides: Confronting the limits of cultural assimilation. Journal of the Gilded Age and the Progressive Era, 9(2), 221–225.

30.

Gudynas

(2011). Buen Vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86

31.

Hale

C. R.

(2002). Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies, 34(3), 485–524. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3875459

32.

Hale

C. R.

(2006). Más que un indio (More than an Indian): Racial Ambivalence and Neoliberal Multiculturalism in Guatemala. SAR Press.

33.

Hastings

Barrett

Barbuto

Bell

(2011). Developing a paradigm model of youth leadership development and community engagement: A grounded theory. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01019

34.

Hornby

Thomas

(1989). Toward a better standard of management. Personnel Management, 21(1), 52–55.

35.

Human Rights Watch. (2025). “Without water, we are nothing”: The urgent need for a water law in Guatemala. https://www.hrw.org/report/2025/07/guatemala-water-law

36.

Kennedy

(2023). Guatemalan genocide. EBSCO Research Starters. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/guatemalan-genocide

37.

Lamino

Boren-Alpízar

A. E.

Headrick

Burris

Carpio

(2025). Indigenous Maya-Mam leadership competencies: A grounded theory study. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1463562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1463562

38.

Lamino Jaramillo

Boren-Alpízar

A. E

. (2023). Agricultural identity of Indigenous Salasacas in Ecuador. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19(4), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801231197979

39.

Lamino Jaramillo

Boren-Alpizar

A. E.

Morales

Burris

Carpio

. (2022). A love-hate relationship: An ethnographic study of migration with Lenca women in rural Honduras. Migration and Development, 11(3), 1218–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2021.1934022

40.

Laurier

(2010). Participant observation. In Clifford

French

Valentine

(Eds.), Key methods in geography (2nd ed., pp. 116–130). SAGE. https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/8446271/PDF_Laurier_2010_Participant_Observation.pdf

41.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

42.

López Ramírez

. (2007). La cosmovisión Xinka [The Xinka Worldview]. Liga Maya Guatemala [Guatemalan Mayan League].

43.

Marqués

Roldán

(2020). Una reflexión crítica acerca del paradigma del “Buen Vivir” como alternativa al modelo de desarrollo [A critical reflection on the “Good Living” paradigm as an alternative to the development model]. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 59(154), 59–67. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/download/37323/43642/160197

44.

Martiskainen

(2017). The role of community leadership in the development of grassroots innovations. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.05.002

45.

McAllister

(2008). Rural markets, revolutionary souls, and rebellious women in Cold War Guatemala. In Joseph

G. M.

Spenser

(Eds.), From the cold: Latin America’s new encounter with the cold war (pp. 350–377). Duke University Press.

46.

McAllister

Nelson

D. M.

(Eds.). (2013). War by other means: Aftermath in post-genocide Guatemala. Duke University Press.

47.

Montero

(2010). Fortalecimiento de la ciudadanía y transformación social: área de encuentro entre la psicología política y la psicología comunitaria [Strengthening citizenship and social transformation: Crossroads between political psychology and community psychology]. Psykhe, 19(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282010000200006

48.

Niewoehner-Green

Stedman

N. L. P.

Galindo-Gonzalez

Russo

Carter

Colverson

K. E.

(2019). The influence of gender on rural Honduran women’s participation and leadership in community groups. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 26(2), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.5191/iaee.2019.26204

49.

Osorio

S. C.

Best

(2015). A case study on culture brokers and their role in tourism management in the Indigenous community of Taquile island in Puno, Peru. International Journal of Tourism Research, 17(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1992

50.

Pain

(2012). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100401

51.

Pardo

Hansell

T. M.

(2018). Retos y transformaciones: Liderazgo comunitario y gobernanza territorial indigena en el alto Wangki Bocay [Challenges and transformations: Community leadership and Indigenous territorial governance in the high Wangki Bocay]. Raíces—Revista Nicaragüense de Antropología, 1(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.5377/raices.v1i2.5856

52.

Press

(1969). Ambiguity and innovation: Implications for the genesis of the culture broker. American Anthropologist, 71(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1969.71.2.02a00010

53.

Raelin

J. A.

(2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership, 7(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010394808

54.

Raelin

J. A.

(2021). Leadership-as-practice: Its past history, present emergence, and future potential. Academy of Management Collections, 17, 14–12. https://doi.org/10.5465/amc.2021.0005

55.

Rojas

(1988). La Cofradía, reducto cultural indígena [The Brotherhood, an indigenous cultural stronghold]. Seminario de Integración Social Guatemalteca.

56.

Sachse

(2010). Reconstructive description of eighteenth-century Xinka grammar [Doctoral dissertation, LOT].

57.

Sachse

(2014). Cultivating marginality: The process of reconstructing identity and the development of Xinka cultural activism in Southeastern Guatemala. Christophe Helmke & Frauke Sachse. https://www.academia.edu/download/41368206/Sachse_2014_Cultivating_Marginality.pdf

58.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

59.

Satizábal

De Lourdes Melo Zurita

(2021). Bodies-holding-bodies: The trembling of women’s territorio-cuerpo-tierra and the feminist responses to the earthquakes in Mexico City. Third World Thematics a TWQ Journal, 6(4–6), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2022.2123953

60.

Sieder

(2011). Contested sovereignties: Indigenous law, violence and state effects in postwar Guatemala. Critique of Anthropology, 31(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x11409729

61.

Sippel

C. S.

Sippel

S. R.

(2024). Territorio-tierra: A community feminist perspective on land by Indigenous Xinka women from Guatemala. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, 12(1), 00024. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2024.00024

62.

Sørensen

N. N.

(2019). Wars and migration crises in Central America. In Menjívar

Ruiz

Ness

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of migration crises (pp. 389). Oxford University Press.

63.

Spradley

J. P.

(2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.

64.

Strauss

Corbin

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.

65.

Syam

Olendo

Y. O.

Dewantara

J. A.

Rahmani

E. F.

(2024). Oral literature and social identity of the Dayak Kanayatn: The extinction of oral literature in the midst of contemporary cultural trends. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1), 2376785. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2376785

66.

Tauli-Corpuz

(2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous peoples on her visit to Guatemala (A/HRC/39/17/Add.3). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://un.arizona.edu/search-database/report-special-rapporteur-rights-indigenous-peoples-her-visit-guatemala

67.

Turner

B. M.

Sánchez

S. E. L.

(2020). The legacy of colonialism in Guatemala and its impact on the psychological and mental health of Indigenous Mayan communities. International Review of Psychiatry, 32(4), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1751090

68.

Tzul Tzul

. (2018). Rebuilding communal life. NACLA Report on the Americas, 50(4), 404–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2018.1550986

69.

Vanheusden

(2019). El Museo Xinka, guardián de la identidad y patrimonio cultural del pueblo Xinka [The Xinka Museum, guardian of the identity and cultural heritage of the Xinka people]. Encuentro Regional del ICOFOm LAM, 62. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/263175/1/2022%20Actas%20Guatemala%20final%20con%20ISBN.pdf#page=80

70.

Vásquez Monterroso

. (2019). Los xinka: ciclos históricos e invisibilización censal [The xinka: Historical cycles and census invisibility]. Plaza Pública. https://www.plazapublica.com.gt/content/los-xinka-ciclos-historicos-e-invisibilizacion-censal

71.

Velásquez Nimatuj

I. A

. (2016). Struggles and obstacles in Indigenous women’s fight for justice in Guatemala. Portal, 11, 23–26. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2X63B

72.

Zhang

Cao

(2012). Understanding Indigenous leadership research: Explication and Chinese examples. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1063–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.009

Living the Xinka way: leadership rooted in Indigenous worldview

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References