Rural ways of life are frequently upheld as the pinnacle of Indigenous authenticity. It is often argued that urban-based and newly identifying Indigenous people model their authenticity after these ideals, or, conversely, that they pursue hybridity and Indigenous modernity instead of authenticity. Crucially, however, how and why Indigenous people themselves regard authenticity, rural, and urban as meaningful social constructions and expressions of agency is being overlooked. I propose a new conceptual approach based on ethnographic fieldwork among Khoisan (the Indigenous people of South Africa) revivalists in Cape Town, South Africa, between 2014 and 2022. As an assertion of self-representation, subversive authenticity thrives on intermittently rejecting, reinforcing, and ignoring dominant representations of Indigenous authenticity. This perspective provides new insights on the role of authenticity in processes of Indigenous resurgence and highlights the importance of theorising alongside Indigenous people.
Castle exhibition affirms First Nation. (2016, July10). Eerste Nasie Nuus.
2.
AbrahamsY. (1994). Resistance, pacification and consciousness: A discussion of the historiography of Khoisan resistance from 1972 to 1993 and Khoisan resistance from 1652 to 1853 [Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town]. OpenUCT. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8489
3.
AbrahamsY. (1996). Was Eva raped? An exercise in speculative history. Kronos, 23, 3–21.
4.
AdhikariM. (2002). Hope, fear, shame, frustration: Continuity and change in the expression of Coloured identity in White supremacist South Africa, 1910-1994 [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town]. OpenUCT. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18136
Bam-HutchisonJ. (2016, March1). Lalela: Occupying knowledge practices and processes in higher education in South Africa (UCT as case study) [Seminar presentation].HUMU Seminar, Cape Town, South Africa.
BredekampH. (2001). Khoisan revivalism and the Indigenous peoples issue in post-apartheid South Africa. In BarnardA.KenrickJ. (Eds.), Africa’s Indigenous peoples: ‘First peoples’ or ‘marginalised minorities’? (pp. 191–210). Centre of African Studies.
15.
BrownJ.DeumertA. (2017). “My tribe is the Hessequa. I’m Khoisan. I’m African:” Language, desire and performance among Cape Town’s Khoisan language activists. Multilingua, 36(5), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2017-3046
16.
ClarkE.FischerR. (2009, August14). Elke mens is goddelik [Every person is divine]. Eeland Nuus.
17.
EllisW. (2014). Simulacral, genealogical, auratic and representational failure: Bushman authenticity as methodological collapse. Critical Arts, 28(3), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2014.929213
GreenopK.MemmottP. (2013). Aboriginal identity and place in the intercultural settings of metropolitan Australia. In PetersE.AndersenC. (Eds.), Indigenous in the city: Contemporary identities and cultural innovation (pp. 256–281). UBC Press.
JacobsM. R.MerollaD. M. (2017). Being authentically American Indian: Symbolic identity construction and social structure among urban new Indians. Symbolic Interaction, 40(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.266
KhoisanZ. (2015, December1). Aba Te carries Khoi heritage to greater heights. Eerste Nasie Nuus.
26.
KleinhansT. (2012, September6). Cultural genocide of the KhoiSan nation. Eeland Nuus.
27.
KootS. (2016). Contradictions of capitalism in the South African Kalahari: Indigenous Bushmen, their brand and baasskap in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(8–9), 1211–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1158825
28.
KukutaiT. (2013). The structure of urban Māori identities. In PetersE.AndersenC. (Eds.), Indigenous in the city: Contemporary identities and cultural innovation (pp. 311–333). UBC Press.
MaddisonS. (2013). Indigenous identity, ‘authenticity’ and the structural violence of settler colonialism. Identities, 20(3), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.806267
34.
MarceauG. S.GaudetJ. C.AudetV.ParentM.-J.LumsdenM.AbitbolJ. (2017). Urban Indigenous cultural productions in Quebec: Vital connections to cultural reconstruction. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 13(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117701026
Ndlovu-GatsheniS. (2018). Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization. Routledge.
40.
ØvernesS. (2019). Street Khoisan: On belonging, recognition and survival. Unisa Press.
41.
PackS. (2012). What is a real Indian? The interminable debate of cultural authenticity. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 8(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011200800206
42.
PalmiéS. (2013). Mixed blessings and sorrowful mysteries: Second thoughts about ‘hybridity’. Current Anthropology, 5(4), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/671196
43.
ParadiesY. C. (2006). Beyond Black and White: Essentialism, hybridity and indigeneity. Journal of Sociology, 42(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783306069993
44.
PetersE.AndersenC. (2013a). Conclusion: Indigenizing modernity or modernizing indigeneity?. In PetersE.AndersenC. (Eds.), Indigenous in the city: Contemporary identities and cultural innovation (pp. 377–387). UBC Press.
45.
PetersE.AndersenC. (2013b). Introduction. In PetersE.AndersenC. (Eds.), Indigenous in the city: Contemporary identities and cultural innovation (pp. 1–20). UBC Press.
46.
PorterL.YiftachelO. (2019). Urbanizing settler-colonial studies: Introduction to the special issue. Settler Colonial Studies, 9(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2017.1409394
RassoolC. (2009). Ethnographic elaborations, Indigenous contestations, and the cultural politics of imagining community: A view from the District Six Museum in South Africa. In Sleeper-SmithS. (Ed.), Contesting knowledge. Museums and Indigenous perspectives (pp. 106–128). University of Nebraska Press.
49.
RavindranT. (2015). Beyond the pure and the authentic: Indigenous modernity in Andean Bolivia. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 11(4), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011501100401
50.
RobinsS. (1997). Transgressing the borderlands of tradition and modernity: Identity, cultural hybridity and land struggles in Namaqualand (1980–94). Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 15(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589009708729601
51.
RobinsS. (2003). Whose modernity? Indigenous modernities and land claims after apartheid. Development and Change, 34(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00305
52.
SahlinsM. (1999). Two or three things that I know about culture. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(3), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661275
53.
SharpJ.BoonzaierE. (1994). Ethnic identity as performance: Lessons from Namaqualand. Journal of Southern African Studies, 20(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057079408708410
54.
SissonsJ. (2005). First Peoples: Indigenous cultures and their futures. Reaktion Books.
55.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
56.
SpivakG. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In GrossbergL.NelsonC. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 66–111). Macmillan.
57.
SylvainR. (2014). Essentialism and the Indigenous politics of recognition in Southern Africa. American Anthropologist, 116(2), 251–264.
VeraciniL.VerbuystR. (2020). South Africa’s settler-colonial present: Khoisan revivalism and the question of Indigeneity. Social Dynamics, 46(2), 259–276.
64.
VerbuystR. (2022). Khoisan consciousness: An ethnography of emic histories and Indigenous revivalism in post-apartheid Cape Town. Brill.
65.
VerbuystR. (2023). The decolonial turn in Khoisan studies: Opportunities, pitfalls, and new directions in longstanding debates concerning Southern Africa’s Indigenous people. Critical Arts, 37(5), 40–56.
WattE.KowalE. (2019). To be or not to be Indigenous? Understanding the rise of Australia’s Indigenous population since 1971. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(16), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2018.1546021
