Aotearoa (New Zealand) is undertaking reforms in natural resource management, and there are promising signals that Indigenous perspectives will be included alongside science for decision-making. Any resource management system is underpinned by worldviews, from which values stem and then risk and uncertainty derive. Māori (the Indigenous peoples of New Zealand) and Eurocentric notions of risk and uncertainty are fundamentally different because knowledge holders have different worldviews. Eurocentric concepts of risk and uncertainty continue to frame policy, making it challenging for Māori knowledge to shape policy that is relevant for decision-making in Aotearoa. We explore Māori perspectives of risk and uncertainty and literature, identifying common attributes across natural resource management frameworks, and identify issues of risk and uncertainty from the perspective of Māori experts. We conclude that a Māori approach to enhancing natural resources is more aligned to current environmental policy compared with standard approaches for risk assessment and reducing uncertainty.
CapraF. (1996). The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter. Flamingo.
2.
ChanK. M.BalvaneraP.BenessaiahK.ChapmanM.DíazS.Gómez-BaggethunE.GouldR.HannahsN.JaxK.KlainS.LuckG. W.Martín-LópezB.MuracaB.NortonB.OttK.PascualU.SatterfieldT.TadakiM.TaggartM.TurnerN. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1462–1465.
3.
ChilisaB. (2019). Indigenous research methodologies. SAGE.
4.
ClapcottJ.AtariaJ.HepburnC.HikuroaD.JacksonA. M.KirikiriR.WilliamsE. (2018). Mātauranga Māori: Shaping marine and freshwater futures. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 52(4), 457–466.
5.
CrottyM. (2020). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
HarcourtN.AwatereS.HyslopJ.TauraY.WilcoxM.TaylorL.RauJ.TimotiP. (2022). Kia manawaroa kia puawai: Enduring Māori livelihoods. Sustainability Science, 17(2), 391–402.
9.
HarcourtN.Robson-WilliamsM.TamepoR. (2022). Supporting the design of useful and relevant holistic frameworks for land use opportunity assessment for Indigenous people. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 26(1), 116–130.
10.
HarmsworthG.AwatereS.RobbM. (2016). Indigenous Māori values and perspectives to inform freshwater management in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Ecology & Society, 21, Article 4.
11.
HarmsworthG. R.AwatereS. (2013). Indigenous Māori knowledge and perspectives of ecosystems. In DymondJ. R. (Ed.), Ecosystem services in New Zealand—conditions and trends (pp. 274–286). Manaaki Whenua Press.
12.
HikuroaD. (2017). Mātauranga Māori—the ūkaipō of knowledge in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 47(1), 5–10.
KawharuM. (2000). Kaitiakitanga: A Māori anthropological perspective of the Māori socio-environmental ethic of resource management. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 109(4), 349–370.
15.
KingD. N.GoffJ. (2010). Benefitting from differences in knowledge, practice, and belief: Māori oral traditions and natural hazards science. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10(9), 1927–1940.
16.
Le HeronR.LundquistC. J.LogieJ.BlackettP.HeronE. L.AwatereS.HyslopJ. (2022). A socio-ecological appraisal of perceived risks associated with mangrove (mānawa) management in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 56(3), 447–465.
17.
MahuikaA. (1998). Whakapapa is the heart. In CoatesK.McHughP. G. (Eds.), Living relationships—Kokiri ngatahi: The Treaty of Waitangi in the new millennium (pp. 215–221). Victoria University Press.
18.
MakeyL.AwatereS. (2018). He mahere pāhekoheko mō Kaipara Moana–integrated ecosystem-based management for Kaipara Harbour, Aotearoa New Zealand. Society & Natural Resources, 31(12), 1400–1418.
19.
MarsdenM.HenareT. A.RoyalC. (2003). Kaitiakitanga: A definitive introduction to the holistic worldview of the Māori. In RoyalT. A. C. (Ed.), The woven universe: Selected writings of Rev. Māori Marsden (pp. 54–72). Estate of Rev. Māori Marsden.
20.
MaxwellK. H.RatanaK.DaviesK. K.TaiapaC.AwatereS. (2020). Navigating towards marine co-management with Indigenous communities on-board the Waka-Taurua. Marine Policy, 111, Article 103722.
21.
MercierR.StevensN.TiaA. (2011). Mātauranga Māori and the data-information-knowledge–wisdom hierarchy: A conversation on interfacing knowledge systems. MAI Journal, 1, 103–116.
MorganT.ManuelR. (2020). Western science and Indigenous wisdom: Is integration possible, practical, plausible. New Zealand Science Review, 76(2), 6–12.
25.
MorganT. K. K. B. (2006, December). Decision-support tools and the Indigenous paradigm. In. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability (Vol. 159, No. 4, pp. 169–177). Thomas Telford Ltd.
26.
ReidJ.RoutM. (2020). Developing sustainability indicators–The need for radical transparency. Ecological Indicators, 110, Article 105941.
27.
RobertsM. (2005). Walking backwards into the future: Māori views on genetically modified organisms. WINHEC: International Journal of Indigenous Education Scholarship, 1, 49–60.
28.
RobertsM. (2013). Ways of seeing: Whakapapa. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 10(1), 93–120.
29.
RoutM.AwatereS.MikaJ. P.ReidJ.RoskrugeM. (2021). A Māori approach to environmental economics: Te ao tūroa, te ao hurihuri, te ao mārama—The old world, a changing world, a world of light. In ShugartJ. (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of environmental science. Oxford University Press.
30.
RuruI. (2015). The mauri compass. A concept paper showing the mauri compass as an evaluation tool in a RMA Freshwater context. Te Rūnanga o Turanganui a Kiwa.
31.
SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Zed Books and University of Otago Press.
32.
Taarup-EsbensenJ. (2019). Making sense of risk—a sociological perspective on the management of risk. Risk Analysis, 39(4), 749–760.
33.
TetlockP. E.MellersB. A.ScoblicJ. P. (2017). Sacred versus pseudo-sacred values: How people cope with taboo trade-offs. American Economic Review, 107(5), 96–99.
34.
Van der LindenS. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 430–440.
35.
WalkerD. P.AtariaJ. M.HugheyK. F.ParkP. T.KateneJ. P. (2021). Environmental and spatial planning with ngā Atua kaitiaki: A Mātauranga Māori framework. New Zealand Geographer, 77(2), 90–100.
36.
WilsonR. S.ZwickleA.WalpoleH. (2019). Developing a broadly applicable measure of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 39(4), 777–791.
