Till the land,defend the land: reflections on the critical place-based pedagogy of the Alternative Learning Center for Agricultural and Livelihood Development,Surigao del Sur
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2022
Till the land,defend the land: reflections on the critical place-based pedagogy of the Alternative Learning Center for Agricultural and Livelihood Development,Surigao del Sur
This study delves into the critical dimensions of agrarian education and practices in the Alternative Learning Center for Agricultural and Livelihood Development in Surigao del Sur, Mindanao, Philippines. Alternative Learning Center for Agricultural and Livelihood Development is an alternative Indigenous school for the Lumad peoples, a collective identity encompassing 18 ethnolinguistic groups in Mindanao. The school’s curriculum, contrapuntal to mainstream education, emphasizes agricultural practice as a subject component. Informants of this study, which includes two students, two teachers, and a curriculum designer, suggest that organic farming sustains both the food security of the school and the students’ commitment to defending their ancestral land. Reflecting through the syncretized lens of pedagogy and ecology, the study describes how the environmental knowledge construed by the schools’ composite pedagogy fosters a radical stewardship over the Lumad ancestral domain. This perception of land necessitates not only a pro-environmental ethic but also the organized resistance against resource dispossession.
AlamonA. (2017). Wars of extinction: Discrimination and the Lumad struggle in Mindanao. Rural Missionaries of the Philippines Northern Mindanao Sub-Region.
2.
AlejoA. (2018). Strategic identity: Bridging self-determination and solidarity among the Indigenous peoples of Mindanao, the Philippines. Thesis Eleven, 145(1), 38–57.
3.
Alternative Learning Center for Agricultural and Livelihood Development. (2021). ALCADEV. https://alcadev.wordpress.com
4.
BelisarioP. (2019). Lumad schools: A struggle for land and learning. In del Rosario-MalonzoJ. (Ed.), Repression and impunity: Continuing attacks on people’s rights in the Philippines (pp. 71–80). IBON International.
5.
BurblesN.BerkR. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In PopkewitzT.FendlerL. (Eds.), Critical theories in education (pp. 45–65). Routledge.
6.
CabanillaG. (2013). An exploration of the benefits of an Indigenous Community Learning Center’s mini-school library. School Libraries Worldwide, 19(1), 91–99.
7.
CanudayJ. J. (2009). Bakwit: The power of the displaced. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
8.
ChoudryA. (2010). Against the flow: Maori knowledge and self-determination struggles confront neoliberal globalization in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In KapoorD.ShizhaE. (Eds.), Indigenous knowledge and learning in Asia/Pacific and Africa (pp. 47–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
DetwilerF. (1992). All my relatives: Persons in Oglala religion. Religion, 22(1), 235–246.
12.
Educators’ Development Institute. (2018). Notes on the Lumad schools’ curriculum.
13.
EmpongC.SyJ. M.AcuñaT. (2021). Padayon ta sa pakigbisog: A challenge and message of Lumad youth (Continue the struggle: A challenge and message of Lumad youth). Pingkian: Journal for Emancipatory and Anti-Imperialist Education, 6(1), 68–78.
14.
Episcopal Commission on Indigenous Peoples. (2008). Indigenous peoples education: From alienation to rootedness. Human Rights Education in Asian Schools, 11, 113–125.
15.
Fiag-oyG. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and practices: A sampler. In ArquizaY. (Ed.), A journey of hope: Cultural revival in a changing world (Vol. 2, pp. 1–24). International Labour Organization.
16.
FreireP. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (RamosM. B., Trans.). Continuum.
17.
GasparK. (1997). The Mindanao Lumad social movement. Mindanao Focus, 15(1), 1–14.
18.
GasparK. (2000). The Lumad’s struggle in the face of globalization. Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao.
19.
GasparK. (2011). Manobo dreams in Arakan: People’s struggle to keep their homeland. Ateneo de Manila University Press.
GrimJ. (Ed.). (2001). Indigenous traditions and ecology. Harvard University Press.
22.
GruenewaldD. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.
23.
GuptaM.PadelF. (2019). Indigenous knowledge and value systems in India: Holistic analysis of tribal education and the challenge of decentralising control. In BeheraM. C. (Ed.), Shifting perspectives in tribal studies: From an anthropological approach to interdisciplinarity and consilience (pp. 67–86). Springer.
24.
HallM. (2011). Plants as persons: A philosophical botany. State University of New York Press.
25.
HarveyD. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
26.
ImbongJ. D. (2020). “Bungkalan” and the Manobo-Pulangihon tribe’s resistance to corporate land-grab in Bukidnon, Mindanao. Alternative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120967724
27.
KrzesniD. (2015). Pedagogy for restoration: Addressing social and ecological degradation through education. Peter Lang.
28.
LanuzaG. (2015). Reactivating youth activism in the age of slacktivism. Plaridel, 12(1), 97–122.
LoveN. (1996). What’s left of Marx. In WhiteS. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas (pp. 46–66). Cambridge University Press.
31.
MinoiJ.MohamedF.ArnabS.PhoaJ.MoriniL.BeaufoyJ.LimT.ClarkeS. (2019). A participatory co-creation model to drive community engagement in rural Indigenous schools: A case study in Sarawak. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(3), 173–183.
OrtegaA. A. (2017). Neoliberalizing spaces in the Philippines: Suburbanization, transnational migration, and dispossession. Lexington Books.
37.
PalugaM. J.RagragioA. M. (2016, July23–24). Why do Indigenous communities resort to voluntary evacuations? [Conference paper]. First Read at the International Conference for People’s Rights in the Philippines, Workshop 11 (“Violations on Collective Rights: Stories of Resistance”), Sampaguita Hall, Brokenshire Resort Complex, Davao City, Philippines.
38.
ParedesO. (2013). A mountain of difference: The Lumad in early colonial Mindanao. Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.
39.
RappaportB. M. (1974). Towards a Marxist theory & practice of teaching. Crime and Social Justice, 2(1), 75–81.
40.
RobbinsP. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
41.
RodilR. (1993). The Lumad and Moro of Mindanao. Minority Rights Group International.
42.
RodilR. (2017). Kasaysayan ng mga pamayanan ng Mindanao at Arkipelago ng Sulu 1596–1898, [History of the peoples of Mindanao and the Sulu Acrchipelago 1596–1898].. Komisyon sa Wikang Filipino (Commission on Philippine Languages).
43.
RoseD. (1996). Nourishing terrains: Australian aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Australian Heritage Commission.
44.
Save Our Schools Network. (2019). Intensifying the people’s struggle amidst state fascism. Pamphlet.
45.
Save Our Schools Network. (2021). The state of Lumad schools in Mindanao. Pamphlet.
46.
ScottJ. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
47.
SinghN. K.Espinosa-HeroldM. (2014). Culture-based education: Lessons from Indigenous education in the U.S. and Southeast Asia. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 5(1), 7–39.
48.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
49.
SyJ. M. (2021). Hulagway ng yutang kabilin sa mga map amula sa Lumad Bakwit Iskul: Isang Panimulang Pag-aaral (Impressions of the Ancestral Land in Maps from the Lumad Bakwit School: A Preliminary Study). Daluyan: Journal Ng Wikang Filipino, 27(1), 80–95.
50.
TheriaultN. (2017). A forest of dreams: Ontological multiplicity and the fantasies of environmental government in the Philippines. Political Geography, 58(1), 114–127.
51.
TungpalanM. T.BawaganA. B. (2015). Community development research: Emerging concepts, methods and practices. Philippine Journal of Social Development, 7(1), 73–96.
VillarealG.Jr. (2018). The Lumads of the Philippines: Struggling from conflict toward peace. Globalecco.org. https://globalecco.org/the-lumads
54.
WibbelmannM.SchmutzU.WrightJ.UdallD.RaynsF.KneafseyM.TrenchardL.BennettJ.LennartssonM. (2013). Mainstreaming agroecology: Implications for global food and farming systems [Centre for Agroecology and Food Security discussion paper]. Centre for Agroecology and Food Security.
55.
WotherspoonT. (2015). Formal and informal Indigenous education. In James JacobW.ChengS. Y.PorterM. K. (Eds.), Indigenous education: Language, culture and identity (pp. 77–98). Springer.
56.
WrightS. (Ed.). (2020). Scent of rain, sun and soil: Stories of agroecology by Lumad youth in the Philippines. Community Technical College of Southeastern Mindanao and the Southern Voices Printing Press.
