The educational video game, When Rivers Were Trails, was launched in 2019. The purpose of the game is to teach players about Indigenous perspectives of history, US federal allotment policies affecting tribal nations, and some of the effects of these policies on Indigenous peoples. This article explores tribal college student experiences playing When Rivers Were Trails in hopes that it provides the basis for further research into how tribal college faculty may be able to teach the game within their own classrooms. Tribal colleges and universities were created by tribal nations to provide for the higher education needs of their citizens. Using phenomenological research methods, seven college students volunteered to participate in a brief study about their experiences playing the video game. Upon transcription and analysis of the interview data, three themes were developed that capture how these students define their experience with When Rivers Were Trails: feelings of representation, histories of land dispossession, and resilience of communities.
ArchibaldJ. A. (2008a). An Indigenous storywork methodology. In ColeA. L.KnowlesG. (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 371–393). SAGE.
2.
ArchibaldJ. A. (2008b). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. UBC Press.
3.
BaringerS. (1997). Indian activism and the American Indian Movement: A bibliographical essay. American Indian Culture & Research Journal, 21(4), 217–250.
4.
BarnhardtR.KawagleyA. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.
5.
BenhamM. K. (2007). Mo’ōlelo: On culturally relevant story making from an Indigenous perspective. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 512–533). SAGE.
6.
BigelowB. (1997). On the road to cultural bias: A critique of The Oregon Trail CD-ROM. Language Arts, 74(2), 84–91.
7.
BreuerJ.BenteG. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4, 7–24.
8.
Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2019). Preserving culture and planning for the future: An exploration of student experiences at tribal colleges. Program in Higher Education Leadership, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy, The University of Texas at Austin.
9.
Crazy BullC.GuilloryJ. (2018). Revolution in higher education: Identity & cultural beliefs inspire tribal colleges & universities. Daedalus, 147(2), 95–105.
10.
Crazy BullC.LindquistC.BurnsR.VermillionL.McDonaldL. (2020). Tribal colleges and universities: Building nations, revitalizing identity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(1), 23–29.
11.
Crazy BullC.White HatE. R. (2019). Cangleska Wakan: The ecology of the sacred circle and the role of tribal colleges and universities. International Review of Education, 65, 117–141.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (1994). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
13.
DemmertW. G.TownerJ. C. (2003). A review of the research literature on the influences of culturally based education on the academic performance of Native American students. Northwest Regional Educational Lab.
14.
EmmonsN. (2012). Understanding cultural revitalization among the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, Muncie, IN].
15.
EmmonsN. (2020). Understanding the professional development needs of teachers in tribally controlled schools: A phenomenological study. Journal of American Indian Education, 59(2–3).
16.
GeeJ. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5–16.
17.
GeeJ. P. (2011). Reflections on empirical evidence on games and learning. In TobiasS.FletcherJ. D. (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 223–232). Information Age.
18.
GreenJ.WorkS. (1976). Inherent Indian sovereignty. American Indian Law Review, 4(2), 311–342.
19.
GuilloryR. M.WolvertonM. (2008). It’s about family: Native American student persistence in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(1), 58–87.
20.
HallL. D.SandervilleJ. M. C. (2009). United Sugpiaq Alutiiq (USA) video game: Preserving traditional knowledge, culture, and language. Educational Technology, 49, 20–24.
21.
HarjoL. (2019). Spiral to the stars: Mvskoke tools of futurity. University of Arizona Press.
22.
HillC. G. (2018). Cheyenne Odyssey: Representing removal in an educational video game. Museum Anthropology Review, 12(2), 55.
23.
KafaiY. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.
24.
KawagleyA. O. (2006). A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to ecology and spirit (2nd ed.). Waveland Press.
25.
KenyonD.CarterJ. (2011). Ethnic identity, sense of community, and psychological well-being among northern plains American Indian youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1), 1–9.
26.
KlimmtC.HefnerD.VordererP.RothC.BlakeC. (2010). Identification with video game characters as automatic shift of self-perceptions. Media Psychology, 13(4), 323–338.
27.
KovachM. (2009). Indigenous research methods and interpretation. In KovachM. (Ed.), Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts (pp. 121–140). University of Toronto Press.
28.
KovachM. (2010). Conversational method in Indigenous research. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 5(1), 40–48.
29.
LaPenséeE. (2021). When Rivers Were Trails: Cultural expression in an indigenous video game. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1746919
30.
LaPenséeE.EmmonsN. (2019a). Indigenizing education with the gameWhen Rivers Were Trails. Amerikastudien / American Studies, 61(1), 75–93.
LewisM.MyhraL.SmithB.HolcombS.ErbJ.JimenezT. (2020). Tribally specific cultural learning: The Remember the Removal program. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 16(3), 233–247.
33.
MarquesB.McIntoshJ.CarsonH. (2019). Whispering Tales: Using augmented reality to enhance cultural landscapes and Indigenous values. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 15(3), 193–204.
34.
McMahonR.AlmondA.Whistance-SmithG.SteinhauerD.SteinhauerS.JanesD. P. (2019). Sweetgrass AR: Exploring augmented reality as a resource for Indigenous–settler relations. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4530–4552.
35.
PatridgeS. (2017). Video games and imaginative identification. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 75(2), 181–184.
36.
PolkinghorneD. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). Plenum.
37.
PollioH.HenleyT.ThompsonC. (1997). The phenomenology of everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
38.
SchrierK. (2016). Knowledge games: How playing games can solve problems, create insight, and make change. JHU Press.
39.
SchrierK. (2019). Designing games for moral learning and knowledge building. Games and Culture, 14(4), 306–343.
40.
SchrierK. L. (2005). Revolutionizing history education: Using augmented reality games to teach histories [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Comparative Media Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA].
41.
Shell-WeissM.BardwellB. (2017). Gi-gikinomaage-min (we are all teachers): Using history to give voice to urban Native American communities. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 13(2), 98–105.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
44.
SquireK. (2011). Video games and learning. Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age, 59(1), 129–132.
45.
StruthersR.Penden-McAlpineC. (2005). Phenomenological research among Canadian and United States indigenous populations: Oral tradition and quintessence of time. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1264–1276.
46.
ThomasS.PollioH. (2002). Listening to patients: A phenomenological approach to nursing research and practice. Springer Publishing.
47.
ValleR.KingM.HallingS. (1989). An introduction to existential-phenomenological thought in psychology. In ValleR. S.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 3–16). Plenum. (Original work published 1983)
