The island of Mindanao, dubbed as the “Land of Promise” is home to more than half of natural and mineral resources in the country. It hosts the largest rubber, banana and pineapple plantations as well as huge mining explorations. These big agri-plantations and mining corporations encroach peasant communities and Indigenous Peoples or Lumads in Bukidnon, South Cotabato, Sarangani, Compostela Valley and Davao provinces. Around 500,000 hectares of land in the five regions of Mindanao are planted with crops primarily for export. Ethnographic data were collected during fieldwork in the province of Bukidnon from May to October 2017. Raw data were obtained through formal and informal interviews, direct observation and collective discussions. Field research was carried out mostly with the Manobo-Pulangihon tribe in the municipality of Quezon. This article explores how corporate land-grabbing generates Lumad resistance, thus creating emancipatory politics. First, I briefly lay down the basis of “development programs” of the government within the framework of the neoliberal economic system and contextualize the issue of land-grabbing in Lumad communities in Bukidnon. I rely heavily on the theories provided by David Harvey in crystallizing the neoliberal economic paradigm. I then propose that this market-driven economic model inevitably results in accumulation by dispossession as experienced by the Manobo-Pulangihon tribe. Third, I describe how big landlords and agro-corporations encroach the Manobo-Pulangihon Tribe ancestral lands and explore a novel form of Lumad resistance against corporate land-grab.
AfricaJ. (2006). Who gains from trade and investment in the Third World? In TujanA. (Ed.), Trade liberalization: Asia Pacific Research Network (APRN) policy research conference on trade (pp. 75–80). IBON Center.
2.
AlamonA. (2017). Wars of extinction: Discrimination and the Lumad struggle in Mindanao. Rural Missionaries of the Philippines.
3.
ArrighiG.AschoffN.ScullyB. (2010). Accumulation by dispossession and its limits: The Southern Africa paradigm revisited. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(4), 410–438.
BenjaminsenT.BrycesonI. (2012). Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania. Journal of Peasant Studies, 34(2), 335–355.
7.
CaceresD. (2015). Accumulation by dispossession and socio-environmental conflicts caused by the expansion of agribusiness in Argentina. Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(1), 116–147.
DayeD.HealeyJ. (2015). Impacts of land-use change on sacred forests at the landscape scale. Global Ecology and Conservation, 3, 349–358.
10.
DeiningerK.ByerleeD. (2011). Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?The World Bank’s Agricultural and Rural Development.
11.
Department of Agrarian Reform. (2006, February). Case study on the development contract (pineapple) and land use management (banana) agreement: ARB-members of the CARABAO Farmers Cooperative (CFC) and Del Monte Philippines, Inc. (DMPI) and Skyland, Dole Philippines, Inc. Barangay Cawayan, Impasug-ong, Bukidnon. Department of Agrarian Reform Policy and Strategic Research Service Economic and Socio-Cultural Research Division. https://www.dar.gov.ph/downloads/research-studies/abstracts-of-completed-dar-in-house-and-commissioned-research-studies
12.
DigaL. (2007). Agricultural contracts in Mindanao: The case of banana and pineapple (Discussion Paper Series, 2007-24). Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
GloverD. (1994). Contract farming and commercialization of agriculture in developing countries. In Von BraunJ.KennedyE. (Eds.), Agricultural commercialization, economic development and nutrition (pp. 168–170). John Hopkins University Press.
15.
HallD. (2013). Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the global land grab. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1582–1604.
16.
HarveyD. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
17.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
18.
HoldenW. (2014). The new people’s army and neoliberal mining in the Philippines: A struggle against primitive accumulation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 25(3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2014.922109
19.
HoldenW.IngelsonA. (2007). Disconnect between the Philippine Mining Investment Policy and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 25(4), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2007.11433469
20.
HoldenW.NadeauK.JacobsonD. (2011). Exemplifying accumulation by dispossession: Mining and indigenous peoples in the Philippines. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 93(2), 141–161.
21.
IBON. (1998). Contract growing: Intensifying TNC control in Philippine agriculture (TujanA., Ed.).
22.
IBON. (2005). WTO: Supreme instrument for neoliberal globalization (TujanA.Jr., Ed.).
KleinN. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Metropolitan Books.
26.
LahiffE.DavisN.ManenzheT. (2012). Joint ventures in agriculture: Lessons from land reform projects in South Africa. International Institute for Environment and Development. http://pubs.iied.org/12569IIED/
27.
LevienM. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 457–483.
28.
LopezS. (2017). Land grabbing cases in the Philippines: Greed, hunger and resistance. Philippine Network of Food Security Programmes.
MacleodM. (2016). Development or devastation? Epistemologies of Mayan women’s resistance to open-pit goldmine in Guatemala. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(1), 86–100.
31.
MagdalenaF. (1997). Population growth and changing ecosystems in Mindanao [Special issue]. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 25(1–2), 5–30.
PantojaB.AlvarezJ.SanchezF. (2017, December). Assessment of agribusiness venture arrangements (AVAs) and sugarcane block farming (SBF) for the modernization of agriculture (Discussion Paper Series no. 2017-35). Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. (2016). Building capacities for farmer-cooperatives crucial for agribusiness venture schemes (Issue 2).
53.
WernstedtF.SimkinsP. D. (1965). Migrations and the settlement of Mindanao. The Journal of Asian Studies, 25(1), 83–103.
