This article presents a case study of the ecosystem-based management model embedded within British Columbia’s Marine Plan Partnership for the Pacific North Coast and the Great Bear Initiative. These are two distinct, yet linked, examples of resource management and economic development that use ecosystem-based management in a way that incorporates indigenous perspectives and aspirations. The model potentially provides a framework that other countries, including Aotearoa (New Zealand), could examine and adapt to their own contexts using new governance structures and working with indigenous perspectives that include traditional ecological knowledge and aspirations. The case study is presented from a Māori perspective that represents both an insider (indigenous) and outsider (non-First Nations) view.
BarryJ. M. (2011). Building Collaborative Institutions for Government-to-government Planning: The Nanwakolas Councils Involvement in Central Coast Land and Resource Management Planning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/thesescanada/vol2/BVAU/TC-BVAU-31717.pdf
3.
BarryJ. (2012). Indigenous-state planning as inter-institutional capacity development: The evolution of “Government-to-Government” relations. Coastal British Columbia, Canada. Planning Theory and Practice, 13, 213–231.
4.
BerkesF. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BerkesF. (2015). Coasts for people: Interdisciplinary approaches to coastal and marine resource management. New York, NY: Routledge.
Carter Holt Harvey v Te Rūnanga o Tūwharetoa ki Kawerau & Bay of Plenty Regional Council (AP42/2002) (2002).
8.
CashoreB.HobergG.HowlettM.RaynerJ.WilsonJ. (2001). In search of sustainability: British Columbia Forest Policy in the 1990s. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
9.
ChristensenN. L.BartuskaA. M.BrownJ. H.CarpenterS.D’AntonioC.FrancisR.. . . PetersonC. H. (1996). The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological applications, 6, 665–691.
10.
DeneulinS.ShahaniL. (2009). An introduction to the human development and capability approach. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
11.
Gitxaala Nation & Others v R & Others, FCA 187 (2016).
12.
Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 3 SCR 51 (2004).
13.
Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Management Department. (2015). Heiltsuk Marine Planning and MaPP. Bella Bella, British Columbia, Canada: Author.
14.
HowlettM.RaynerJ.TollefsonC. (2009). From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 383–391.
15.
JacksonT.CurryJ. (2004). Peace in the woods: Sustainability and the democratization of land use planning and resource management on crown lands in British Columbia. International Planning Studies, 9, 27–42.
16.
JohnsonM. (1992). Lore: Capturing traditional environmental knowledge. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Dene Cultural Institute and International Development Research Centre.
17.
KleinE. (2015). Empowered communities: Review of the empowered communities design report (CAEPR Topical Issue No. 1/2015). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.
18.
LaDukeW. (1994). Traditional ecological knowledge and environmental futures. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 5, 127–148.
19.
LowM.ShawK. (2011). First Nations rights and environmental governance: Lessons from the Great Bear Rainforest. BC Studies, 172, 9–33.
Ngāti Hokopuki Hokowhitu v Whakatane District Council (C168/2002) (2002).
24.
Paihia & District Citizens Association Inc v Northland Regional Council (A71/95) (1995).
25.
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc v Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, 2 SCR 650 (2010).
26.
RobertsK. (1996). Circumpolar aboriginal people and co-management practice: Current issues in co-management and environmental assessment. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary.
27.
SaarikoskiH.RaitioK.BarryJ. (2013). Understanding “successful” conflict resolution: Policy regime changes and new interactive arenas in the Great Bear Rainforest. Land Use Policy, 32, 271–280.
SuzukiD. T. (2006). Introduction. In KnudtsonP.SuzukiD. T. (Eds.), Wisdom of the Elders: Native and Scientific Ways of Knowing about Nature. Kindle Edition. Vancouver: Greystone Books.
31.
Taku River Tlingit First Nation v British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), 3 SCR 550 (2004).
32.
United Nations Environmental Programme. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
