This article contextualizes community discourse about promising practices in Inuit bilingual education within the findings of Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Arviat, Nunavut (Canada), is recognized as a success story in English-Inuktitut bilingualism. It has also been a nexus of elder- and Inuit-driven curriculum reform for strong bilingual education. A community-based research team facilitated conversations with 17 elders, teachers, and parents in Arviat, and 10 Inuit leaders elsewhere, about what is supporting bilingual education. Grounded theory analysis revealed family and community leadership as a key theme. Participants attributed successful bilingual education outcomes to family- and community-based language policies and practices that prioritize Inuktitut and support lifelong language learning. Their emphasis is echoed in discourse in other Inuit and Indigenous contexts. We argue that reclaiming the family leadership that was interrupted by residential schooling is a key to achieving or sustaining bilingualism and school success, and is also one aspect of achieving reconciliation.
ArnaquqN. (2008). Uqaujjuusiat: Gifts of words of advice: Schooling, education and leadership in Baffin Island (Master’s thesis). University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada.
2.
ArnaquqN. (2015). Uqaujjuusiat: Gifts of words of advice. In: WaltonF.O’LearyD. (Eds.), Sivumut—Towards the future together: Inuit women educational leaders in Nunavut and Nunavik (pp. 11–28.). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
3.
AylwardM. L. (2009a). Culturally relevant schooling in Nunavut: Views of secondary school educators. Études/Inuit/Studies, 33, 77. doi:10.7202/044961ar
4.
AylwardM. L. (2009b). Journey to Inuuqatigiit: Curriculum development for Nunavut education. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 3, 137–158. doi:10.1080/15595690902991022
5.
BergerP. (2009). Eurocentric roadblocks to school change in Nunavut. Études/Inuit/Studies, 33, 55–76. doi:10.7202/044960ar
6.
BergerT. (2006). Conciliator’s final report March 1, 2006: “The Nunavut Project” Nunavut Land claims agreement implementation contract negotiations for the second planning period 2003–2013. Ottawa, Ontario: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
7.
BlommaertJ. (2013). Language and the study of diversity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 74, 1–14.
8.
ColeW. M. (2011). Uncommon schools: The global rise of postsecondary institutions for Indigenous peoples. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. doi:10.11126/stanford/9780804772105.001.0001
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
11.
DoraisL. J. (1996). La parole Inuit: Langue, culture et société dans l’Arctique nord-américain. Louvain, Belgium: Peeters Publishers.
12.
FynD. E. L. (2014). Our stories. Inuit teachers create counter narratives and disrupt the status quo (Doctoral dissertation). University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
13.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1969).
15.
Grand Council of the Crees, Northern Quebec Inuit Association, Government of Quebec, James Bay Energy Corporation, James Bay Development Corporation, Quebec Hydro-Electric Commission, & Government of Canada, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. (1975). James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. Retrieved from http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100030848/1100100030850
HornbergerN. H. (2009). Multilingual education policy and practice: Ten certainties (grounded in Indigenous experience). Language Teaching, 42, 197–211. doi:10.1017/S0261444808005491
18.
KaukiM. J. (2015). Reflections of an emerging Inuit educational leader. In F. Walton & D. O’Leary (Eds.), Sivumut—Towards the future together: Inuit women educational leaders in Nunavut and Nunavik (pp. 141–162). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
19.
KennyC.FraserT. N. (Eds.) (2012). Living indigenous leadership: Native narratives on building strong communities. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: UBC Press.
20.
KingK. A.FogleL.Logan-TerryA. (2008). Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 907–922. doi:10.1111/j.1749–818X.2008.00076.x
21.
Labrador Inuit Association, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, & Government of Canada. (2005). Land claims agreement between the Inuit of Labrador and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Newfoundland and Labrador and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1293647179208/1293647660333
22.
MartinI. (2000). Aajiiqatigiingniq: Language of instruction research paper (Report submitted to the Nunavut Department of Education). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: York University.
MayS. (2013). Indigenous immersion education: International developments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 34–69. doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.03may
25.
McCartyT. L.NicholasS. E. (2014). Reclaiming Indigenous languages: A reconsideration of the roles and responsibilities of schools. Review of Research in Education, 38, 106–136. doi:10.3102/0091732X13507894
26.
National Committee on Inuit Education. (2011). First Canadians, Canadians first: National strategy on Inuit education. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Amaujaq National Centre for Inuit Education.
27.
PatrickD.ShearwoodP. (1999). The roots of Inuktitut-language bilingual education. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 19, 249–262.
28.
Qanatsiaq AnoeeN. (2015). Learning through tunnganarniq. In WaltonF.O’LearyD. (Eds.), Sivumut—Towards the future together: Inuit women educational leaders in Nunavut and Nunavik (pp. 89–102). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
SmithG. H. (1995). Whānau (extended family) structures as an innovative intervention into Māori educational and schooling crises. In: Association for Baha’i Studies Australia (Ed.), The family: Our hopes and challenges. Rosebery, New South Wales: Association for Baha’i Studies Australia. Retrieved from http://bahai-library.com/smith_extended_family_structures
32.
SmithG. H. (1997). The development of Kaupapa Maori: Theory and praxis (Doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
33.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.
34.
Special Committee on Education. (1982). Learning: Tradition and change in the Northwest Territories. Yellowknife, Canada: Northwest Territories Legislative Assembly.
35.
Special Committee to Review the Education Act. (2015). Special committee to review the Education Act: Final report. Iqaluit, Canada: Legislative Assembly of Nunavut.
TaylorD. M.WrightS. C. (2003). Do Aboriginal students benefit from education in their heritage language? Results from a ten-year program of research in Nunavik. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 23(1), 1–24.
42.
TompkinsJ. (1998). Teaching in a cold and windy place: Change in an Inuit school. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press. doi:10.3138/9781442680395
43.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Author.
44.
TuafutiP.McCafferyJ. (2005). Family and community empowerment through bilingual education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8, 480–503. doi:10.1080/13670050508668625
45.
TullochS.MetuqL.HainnuJ.PitsiulakS.FlahertyE.LeeC.WaltonF. (2016). Inuit principals and the changing context of bilingual education in Nunavut. Etudes Inuit Studies, 40(1).
46.
WilsonW. H.KamanāK. (2001). Mai loko mai o ka ‘i’ini: “Proceeding from a dream.” The ‘Aha Pu-nana Leo connection in Hawaiian language revitalization. In HintonL.HaleK. (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 147–178). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. doi:10.1163/9789004261723_014
