This article re-examines the armed Miskitu insurgency conducted against the Sandinista revolutionary government on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast (1981–1987) and discloses the problematic relationship that developed between Miskitu fighters and other non-indigenous, CIA-backed, armed, counter-revolutionary groups, or Contras. Drawing on interview data, the article also demonstrates how the divergent actions of the two main Miskitu leaders, Steadman Fagoth Mūller and Brooklyn Rivera Bryan, during the post-revolutionary period have influenced contemporary memories of the Miskitu insurgency of the 1980s and the role played by these leaders in the conduct and nature of the conflict.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaraccoL. (2005). Nicaragua: The imagining of a nation from nineteenth-century liberals to twentieth-century Sandinistas.New York: Algora Publishing.
2.
Barricada. (1981, 21 February). Quebrado plan ‘contra’ de Fagoth. p. 1.
3.
Barricada. (1981, 24 February). Plan separatista provoca 8 muertos in Prinzapolka. Column 2. p. 7.
CalderónM. (1981). We have the job of forging a class consciousness! In OhlandK., & SchneiderR. (Eds.), (1983), National revolution and indigenous identity: The conflict between Sandinistas and Miskito Indians on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast (pp. 142–152). Copenhagen: IWGIA.
DennisP., & OlienM. (1984). Kingship among the Miskito.American Ethnologis, 11(4), 718–737.
8.
El Nuevo Diario. (1981, 22 February). Fagoth: De soplón a conspirador.Quería ser ‘Rey Mosco’. pp. 1, 9.
9.
El Nuevo Diario. (1981, 28 February). Evertsz relata cómo Fagoth comenzó en OSN. p. 5.
10.
FreelandJ. (1988). A special place in history: The Atlantic Coast in the Nicaraguan Revolution.London: Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign.
11.
GonzálezM. (2011). El gigante que despierta (the awakening giant): Parties and elections in the life of the autonomous regional councils. In BaraccoL. (Ed.), National integration and contested autonomy: The Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua (pp. 147–190). New York: Algora Publishing.
12.
HaleC. R. (1994). Resistance and contradiction: Miskitu Indians and the Nicaraguan State, 1894-1987.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
13.
HelmsM. (1971). Asang: Adaptations to culture context in a Miskito community.Gainville: University of Florida Press.
MISURASATA. (1980). General directions. In OhlandK., & SchneiderR. (Eds.), (1983), National revolution and indigenous identity: The conflict between Sandinistas and Miskito Indians on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast (pp. 48–63). Copenhagen: IWGIA.
17.
MISURASATA. (1981a). Plan of action for the MISURASATA movement in 1981. In OhlandK., & SchneiderR. (Eds.), (1983), National revolution and indigenous identity: The conflict between Sandinistas and Miskito Indians on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast (pp. 89–94). Copenhagen: IWGIA.
18.
MISURASATA. (1981b). Proposal on land-holding in the Indigenous and Creole communities of the Atlantic Coast. In OhlandK., & SchneiderR. (Eds.), (1983), National revolution and indigenous identity: The conflict between Sandinistas and Miskito Indians on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast (pp. 163–177). Copenhagen: IWGIA.
19.
OhlandK., & SchneiderR. (Eds.). (1983). National revolution and indigenous identity: The conflict between Sandinistas and Miskito Indians on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast.Copenhagen: IWGIA.
20.
PinedaB. (2006). Shipwrecked identities: Navigating race on Nicaragua's Mosquito Coast.New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
21.
SklarH. (1988). Washington's War on Nicaragua.Cambridge MA: South End Press.
22.
VilasC. (1989). State, class, and ethnicity in Nicaragua: Capitalist modernization and revolutionary change on the Atlantic Coast.Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
