Over the past three decades, ethnographic museums have increasingly collected and displayed contemporary artworks in order to challenge assumptions about the (in)authenticity of cultural minorities. Yet, this paper argues, by perpetuating ambiguities and contradictions in their collecting and display practices, they have often failed to fully acknowledge the complexities attached to the notion of cultural continuity. Drawing on examples from the Etnografiska Museet in Stockholm and the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (MAA) in Cambridge, it is suggested that the collecting of contemporary artworks in ethnographic museums might not be sufficient to make these institutions socially and politically relevant. As some of the Sámi and Māori artists involved have indicated, direct engagement between artists and museum staff, and with the public, is fundamental to conveying that their artworks are at once “traditional” and “contemporary”.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnardA. (2006). Kalahari revisionism, Vienna and the ‘indigenous peoples’ debate.Social Anthropology, 14(1), 1–16.
2.
BrownD. (2008). Islands of opportunity: Pasifika Styles and museums. In RaymondR., & SalmondA. (Eds.), Pasifika Styles: Artists inside the museum (pp. 21–29). Cambridge and Dunedin: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Otago University Press.
3.
Burns ColemanE. (2001). Aboriginal painting: Identity and authenticity.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59(4), 385–402.
4.
CardinalG. (2003). Totem: The return of the G'psgolox pole.Toronto: National Film Board of Canada (NFB).
5.
ChilunguS. W. (1976). Issues in the ethics of research method: An interpretation of the Anglo-American perspective.Current Anthropology17(3), 457–481.
6.
CliffordJ. (1988). Histories of the tribal and the modern. In J. Clifford, The predicament of culture. Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art (pp. 189–214). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
ConklinB. A. (1997). Body paint, feathers, and VCRs: Aesthetics and authenticity in Amazonian activism.American Ethnologist, 24, 711–737.
8.
DaesE.-I. (1977). Protection of the heritage of Indigenous people.Human Rights Study Series, 10.
9.
DantoA. C. (2006 [1984]). Defective affinities “primitivism” in 20th century art. In MorphyH., & PerkinsM. (Eds.), The anthropology of art: A reader (pp. 147–149). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
DurandC. A. (2008). Fieldwork in a glass case: Artistic practice and museum ethnography. In RaymondR., & SalmondA. (Eds.), Pasifika Styles: Artists inside the museum (pp. 73–80). Cambridge and Dunedin: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Otago University Press.
11.
DurrahScheffyZ-H. (2004). Sámi artistry, identity, and indigenism in museums and markets.PhD Dissertation: Indiana University.
12.
EdbomG. (2005). Samiskt kulturarv i samlingar. Rapport från ett projekt om återfōringsfrågor gāl-lande samiska fōremål. Ájtte, Svenskt Fjāll-och Samemuseum 2005: 1.
13.
FarisJ. C. (1988). “ART/artifact”: On the museum and anthropology.Current Anthropology, 29, 775–779.
14.
FisherJ. (1992). In search of the “inauthentic”: Disturbing signs in contemporary Native American art.Art Journal, 51(3), 44–50.
15.
GeismarH. (2001). What's in a price? An ethnography of tribal art at auctions.Journal of Material Culture, 6, 25–47.
16.
GellA. (1999). Vogel's net traps as artworks and artworks as traps. In HirschE. (Ed.), Art of anthropology: Essays and diagrams (pp. 187–214). London: Athlone Press.
17.
HaasJ. (1996). Power, objects, and a voice for anthropology.Current Anthropology, 37, SI–S22.
18.
HarknettS.-J. (2007). Pasifika Styles interim evaluation report. University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.
19.
HarknettS.-J. (2008). The Pasifika Styles visiting artists programme. In RaymondR., & SalmondA. (Eds.), Pasifika Styles: Artists inside the museum (pp. 97–103). Cambridge and Dunedin: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Otago University Press.
20.
HewittR. (2005). White backlash and the politics of multiculturalism.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KuperA. (2003). The return of the Native.Current Anthropology, 44(3), 389–400.
22.
LassiterL. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
MillerD. (1993). Primitive art and the necessity of primitivism to art. In HillerS. (Ed.), The myth of primitivism: Perspectives on art (pp. 51–71). London: Routledge.
25.
MoutuA. (2007). Pasifika Styles: A polyphonic collage at the University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Anthropology Today, 23, 24–25.
26.
MulkI.-M., & WestmanA. (1999). Foreword. In The Ájtte Swedish Mountain and Sámi Museum. Goabdesájgge: Sámij dalusj doabddáj ja jáhko birra/Drum-time: The drums and religion of the Sámi (pp. 6–7). Luleå: Luleå Alltryck AB.
27.
MyersF. (1991). Representing culture: The production of discourse(s) for Aboriginal acrylic paintings.Cultural Anthropology, 6(1), 26–62.
28.
PaineR. (Ed.) (1985). Advocacy and anthropology, first encounters.St John's: Institute of Social and Economic Research Memorial University of Newfoundland.
29.
PhillipsR. B. (1994). Fielding culture: Dialogues between art history and anthropology.Museum Anthropology, 18, 39–46.
30.
PhillipsR. B. (2006). The collecting and display of souvenir arts: Authenticity and the “strictly commercial”. In MorphyH., & PerkinsM. (Eds.), The anthropology of art: A reader (pp. 147–149). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
31.
PhillipsR. B., & SteinerC. B. (1999). Art, authenticity, and the baggage of cultural encounter. In PhillipsR. B., & SteinerC. B. (Eds.), Unpacking culture: Art and commodity in colonial and postcolonial worlds (pp. 3–19). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
32.
PriceS. (1989). Primitive art in civilized places.Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
RaymondR., & SalmondA. (2008). Introduction. In RaymondR., & SalmondA. (Eds.), Pasifika Styles: Artists inside the museum (pp. 1–29). Cambridge and Dunedin: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Otago University Press.
RubinW. (2003). Modernist primitivism. In FlamJ., & DeutchM. (Eds.), Primitivism and twentieth-century art: A documentary history (pp. 315–333). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
36.
SalmondA. (2008). Interview with Lisa Taouma: Rosanna Raymond and Amiria Salmond. In RaymondR., & SalmondA. (Eds.), Pasifika Styles: Artists inside the museum (pp. 30–36). Cambridge and Dunedin: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Otago University Press.
37.
SandersD. E. (1977). The formation of the World Council of Indigenous Peoples.Copenhagen: IWGIA.
38.
SayersR. (1991). Museum collecting in a postmodern world: A Korean example.Museum Anthropology, 15, 8–12.
39.
SchindlbeckM. (2002). Contemporary Māori art and Berlin's Ethnological Museum. In HerleA., StanleyN., StevensonK., & WelschR. L. (Eds.), Pacific art. Persistence, change and meaning (pp. 342–352). Adelaide: Crawford House Publishing.
40.
StockingG. W. (Ed.) (1985). Objects and others: Essays on museums and material culture.Madison and London: The University of Wisconsin Press.
41.
SunnaH. (1999). Sammetrumma tilverkad 1999. In Label text Den Skapande Mānniskan (Creative Man) Exhibition. The Etnografiska Museet, Stockholm.
42.
SunnaH. (2006). Trumma/Drum. In Sameslōjdstiftelsen Sámi Duodji.Duodji árbi arvet: Handicraft in the Sámi culture (pp. 23–25). Luleå: Luleå Grafiska.
43.
ThomasN. (1996). From exhibit to exhibitionism: Recent Polynesian presentations of “otherness”.The Contemporary Pacific, 8(2), 319–348.
44.
ThomasN. (1999). Possessions: Indigenous art/colonial culture.London: Thames and Hudson.
45.
TurnerT. (1993). Anthropology and multicultural-ism: What is anthropology that multiculturalists should be mindful of it?Cultural Anthropology, 8(4), 411–429.
46.
VogelS. (2006 [1988]). Introduction to art/artifact: African art in anthropology collections. In MorphyH., & PerkinsM., (Eds.), The anthropology of art: A reader (pp. 209–218). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
47.
WeibelP., & BuddensiegA. (Eds.). (2007). Contemporary art and the museum: A global perspective.Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
