There is evidence to suggest that the different languages of Pasifika peoples in New Zealand are declining (Taumoefolau, Bell, & Starks, 2003). This decline, particularly apparent in Manukau, South Auckland, is a challenge. There are two sides to the challenge. The first involves the interrelationship between language and culture. The second is the possible decline of the English achievements of Pasifika students, especially those who attend schools in New Zealand, who speak a Pasifika language as a first language and English as a second language. This paper discusses the implications of this decline, particularly in terms of identity and academic success for Samoan people living in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiono-Le TagaloaF. (1996). O la ta gagana.Apia.Le Lamepa Press.
2.
AllmanW. F. (1990). The mother tongue.US News and World Report, 109(18), 60–70.
3.
Amituanai-ToloaM. (2002). Samoan pedagogy: Teaching and learning and the practice of hearing students read at home. Unpublished master's thesis, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
4.
Amituanai-ToloaM. (2005). Ua malie toa. Ua malie tau: Students with silver tongues whip the tail: Enhanced teaching and learning of reading comprehension in Samoan bilingual classes. Unpublished doctoral thesis. The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
5.
Amituanai-ToloaM. (2007). The ‘Va Tapuia’ (space made sacred) in bridging research and relationships: Brown culture and commonsensical ethics.AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Scholarship, 3, 204–223.
6.
Amituanai-ToloaM., & McNaughtonS. (2008). Reading comprehension in English for Samoan bilingual students in Samoan classes.New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 43(1), 5–20.
7.
Amituanai-ToloaM., McNaughtonS., LaiM. K., & Airini (2009). Milestone 4, Pasifika Schooling Improvement Project. Unpublished draft report to the Ministry of Education, Wellington.
8.
BrownH. D. (2006). Affective variables in second language acquisition.Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 23(2), 231–244.
9.
CrawfordJ. (2007). Seven hypotheses on language loss: Causes and cures. In CantoniG. (Ed.), Stabilizing indigenous languages (Rev. ed.). Flagstaff, Arizona: Northern Arizona University.
10.
CumminsJ. (1991). Interdependence of first-and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In BialystokE. (Ed.). Language processing in bilingual children.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CumminsJ. (1998). Semilingualism. In MeyJ. L. (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (pp. 3812–3814). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
12.
GarciaG. E. (2003). The reading comprehension development and instruction of English-language learners. In SweetA. P., & SnowC. E. (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 30–50). New York: The Guilford Press.
13.
KolhaseM., & TuiotiL. (2002). Bilingual units in: Mangere Central School; Mangere East School; Robertson Road School; Sir Douglas Bader Intermediate School-Analysis and use of student achievement data (AUSAD) review.Wellington: Ministry of Education.
14.
McNaughtonS. (2002). Meeting of minds.Wellington: Learning Media.
15.
McNaughtonS., Amituanai-ToloaM., LaiM., MacDonaldS., & FarryS. (2005, April). Plotting effective instruction: Context-specific relationships between instruction and gains in reading comprehension for Māori and Pasifika students in low decile schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco, CA.
16.
McNaughtonS., Amituanai-ToloaM., MacDonaldS., LaiM., & FarryS. (2007). Plotting effective instruction: Context-specific relationships between instruction and gains and reading comprehension.Educational Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Budapest, September, 2007.
17.
McNaughtonS., MacDonaldS., Amituanai-ToloaM., LaiM., & FarryS. (2006, June). Enhanced teaching and learning of comprehension in Years 4-9 in seven Mangere schools. Final report to NZCER, Wellington.
18.
NietoS. (1996). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
19.
NietoS. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century.London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
OchsE. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287–306.
21.
PolyaniM. (1958). Personal knowledge.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
PolyaniM. (1969). Knowing and being.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
RamsayP. D. K., SneddonD. G., GrenfellJ., FordI. (1981). Tomorrow may be too late. Final report of the Schools with Special Needs Project.Hamilton: University of Waikato.
TaborsP. O., & SnowC. E. (2001). Young bilingual students and early literacy development. In NeumanS. B., & DickinsonD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 159–178). New York: Guilford Press.
27.
Tagoilelagi-LeotaF., McNaughtonS., MacDonaldS., & FarryS. (2005). Bilingual and biliteracy development over the transition to school.The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(5), 455–479.
28.
TaumoefolauM., StarksD., BellA., & DavisK. (2004). The role of second language acquisition theory and practice in Pasifika language maintenance in New Zealand.Language Acquisition Research.Wellington: Ministry of Education Research Division.
29.
van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy.New York: State University of New York Press.
30.
VeltmanC. (1983). Language shift in the United States.Berlin: Mouton.
