This article comments on the process and results of expanding the vocabulary available for teaching and learning science through the medium of Māori in the specific domain of chemical nomenclature. This commentary argues there is a need to balance language revitalization aims for te reo Māori (the Māori language) against the educational aims for Māori medium schooling. It is suggested that chemical names and the periodic table constitute one set of science vocabulary where borrowing, rather than neologism, is to be preferred on these grounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmmonU. (Ed.). (2001). The dominance of English as a language of science.Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyer.
2.
BarkerM. (1999). The Māori language science curriculum in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A contribution to sustainable development.Waikato Journal of Education, 5, 51–60.
3.
ChristensenI. (2009). Te reo pūtaiao.Palmerston North: He Kupenga Hao i te Reo.
4.
HarlowR. (1993). A science and mathematics terminology for Māori. In McKinleyE., & WaitiP. (Eds.), SAMEpapers 1993 (Vol. 1993, pp. 124–137). Hamilton: CSMER Publications.
5.
HarlowR. (2003). Issues in Māori language planning and revitalization.Journal of Māori and Pacific Development, 4(1), 32–43.
6.
HarlowR. (2005). Māori: Introduction. In BellA., HarlowR., & StarksD. (Eds.), Languages of New Zealand (pp. 59–66). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
7.
McKinleyE., & KeeganP. (2008). Curriculum and language in Aotearoa: From science to pūtaiao.L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(1), 135–147.
8.
SpolskyB. (1996). Conditions for language revitalization: A comparison of the cases of Hebrew and Māori. In WrightS. (Ed.), Language and the state (pp. 5–29). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
9.
SpolskyB., & ShohamyE. (2001). The penetration of English as language of science and technology into the Israeli linguistic repertoire: A preliminary enquiry. In AmmonU. (Ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science (Vol. 84; pp. 167–176). Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyer.
10.
ThomasG. (1991). Linguistic purism.London and New York: Longman.
11.
WalkerR. (1996). Māori resistance to state domination. In PetersM., HopeW., MarshallJ., & WebsterS. (Eds.), Critical theory, Poststructuralism & the social context (pp. 257–268). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
12.
WebsterS. (1998). Patrons of Māori culture: Power, theory and ideology in the Māori renaissance.Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
13.
WilsonW. H., & KamanāK. (2001). ‘Mai loko mai o ka ‘i'ini: Proceeding from a dream. In HintonL., & HaleK. (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 147–176). San Diego: Academic Press.
