This paper discusses the dead and non-used Nandi anthroponyms with the aim of highlighting the factors behind their disappearance, non-use or declining usage. Although traditionally the Nandi naming system is elaborate and spans a person's lifetime, present day naming practices show that various types of anthroponym have low usage and others are no longer used. Since the Nandi naming system is intertwined with the Nandi way of life, anthroponyms act as catalogues of past and present Nandi histories. Therefore, when certain anthroponyms die, certain forms of cultural knowledge and history embedded in them are also lost. Language is a complex system and its building blocks are nested, so the loss of certain anthroponymic knowledge, which is part of the Nandi language, leads to the loss of certain linguistic knowledge in the language. This in turn may usher in linguistic turbulence that might bring about the death of the Nandi language.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgyekumK. (2006). The sociolinguistics of Akan personal names.Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 206–235.
2.
AitchisonJ. (1991). Language change: Progress or decay?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BatiboH. M. (2009). Reversing attitudes as a key to language preservation and safeguarding in Africa. In StarkC. (Ed.), Globalization & Languages: Building on Our Rich Heritage (pp. 174–180). Paris: UNESCO.
4.
BatiboH. M. (2008, August). Reversing attitudes as a key to language preservation and safeguarding in Africa. Paper presented at UNESCO's International Conference on Globalization and Languages. UNU Headquarters, Tokyo.
ChogeS. C. (1997). Anthroponimu asilia za Kinandi kwa mtazamo wa kisemantiki [Cultural Nandi anthroponyms from a semantic perspective]. Unpublished Masters of Philosophy thesis, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
8.
CollinsJ. T. (2003). Language death in Maluku: The impact of the VOC.Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde159(2/3), 247–289.
9.
Creider-TapsubeiJ. (1992). The Shrunken Dream.Onatario: Women's Press.
10.
CrystalD. (2000). Language death.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CrystalD. (2003, March). Crossing the great divide: Language endangerment and public awareness. Paper presented at the international expert meeting on endangered languages, UNESCO Paris.
12.
ElmanJ. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In PortR. T., & van GelderT. (Eds.) Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 195–223). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
13.
FabunmiF. A., & SalawuA. S. (2005). Is Yorùbá an endangered language?Nordic Journal of African Studies, 14(3), 391–408.
14.
FinchA. (2004, Autumn). Complexity and systems theory: Implications for the EFL.Journal of Asia TEFL, 1(2), 27–46.
15.
Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project (HRELP). (n.d.). Retrieved 27 December, 2009, from http://www.hrelp.org
16.
HollisA. C. (1909). The Nandi. Their culture and folklore.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17.
HuntingfordG. W. B. (1950). Nandi work and culture. Colonial Research Studies, No. 4.London: HMSO for the Colonial Office.
18.
KipkorirB. (1985). Kenya's people. People of the Rift Valley. Kalenjins (2nd ed.). Nairobi: Evans Brothers.
KouegaJ. P. (2007). Forenames in Cameroon English speech.The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 23.
21.
Larsen-FreemanD. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition.Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.
22.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In KramschC. (Ed.), Language acquisition and socialization (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
23.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English.Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
24.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2007). On the complementarity of chaos/complexity theory and dynamic systems theory in understanding the second language acquisition process.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 35–37.
25.
Larsen-FreemanD., & CameronL. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
LegèreK. (2007). Vidunda (G38) as an endangered language? In PayneD. L., & PeñaJ. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (pp. 43–54). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
27.
LewisM. P. (Ed.). (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (16th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International. Online version. Retrieved 27 December, 2009, from http://www.ethnologue.com
MarinM. M., & Peltzer-KarpfA. (2009). Towards a dynamic systems approach to the development of language and music: Theoretical foundations and methodological issues. In LouhivuoriJ. (Eds.), The 7th Triennial conference of European society for the cognitive sciences of music (pp 284–292).
30.
MufweneS. S. (1998). Language endangerment: What have pride and prestige got to do with it? In JosephB. D., DestafanoJ., JacobsN. G., & LehisteI. (Eds.). When languages collide: Perspectives on language conflict, language competition and language coexistence (pp. 324–346). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
31.
ObolerR. S. (1985). Women, power and economic change. The Nandi of Kenya.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
32.
Ochieng’W. R. (1975). An outline of the Rift Valley of Kenya up to A.D. 1900.Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau.
33.
OgechiN. O., & RutoS. J. (2002). The portrayal of disability through personal names and proverbs in Kenya; evidence of Ekegusii and Nandi.Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift fur kritische Afrikasrudien, 3(2), 64–82.
34.
RadfordA. (1988). Transformational grammar: A first course.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SandsB., MillerL. A., & BrugmanJ. (2007). The lexicon in language attrition: The case of N|uu. In PayneD. L., and PeñaJ. (Eds.). Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (pp. 55–65). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
36.
TamjidN. H. (2007). Chaos/complexity theory in second language acquisition.Novitas-Royal, 1(1), 10–17.
37.
ToweettT. (1979). Kalenjin Linguistics.Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau.
van GeertP. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction.The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179–199.
40.
WehmeierS., McIntoshC., & TurnbullJ. (Eds.). (2005). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Wemba-RashidJ. A. R. (1992). Names and naming systems among Wamakua of Masasi Distirct Tanzania. Unpublished Research article for the Institute of African Studies, University of Nairobi.
42.
WurmS. (1998). Methods of language maintenance and revival, with selected cases of language endangerment in the world. In MatsumuraK. (Ed.). Studies in endangered languages. Papers from the international symposium on endangered languages, Tokyo, November 18-20, 1995.Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
