The impact of arteriovenous anastomosis length on fistula flow rate and potential cardiovascular issues is not well established. However, it is widely recognized that proximal fistulas create a significant hemodynamic load, increasing the risk of high-output cardiac failure. Literature indicates that the anastomosis size varies from 3 to 15 mm. Nonetheless, common practice favors 6–10 mm for distal anastomoses, while the length reduces to 4–6 mm when the brachial artery is involved in the elbow or upper arm fistulas. It is advisable to avoid larger arteriotomies to prevent or lessen cardiovascular complications, especially when patients are monitored with access flow assessments and echocardiography for early detection of issues. Considering the high prevalence of elderly patients with cardiovascular risk among incident hemodialysis patients, a more careful approach to managing flow in arteriovenous access is crucial. The anastomotic length should be customized based on the patient’s specific anatomical and physiological conditions, rather than applying a uniform standard.
ViecelliAHowellMTongA, et al. Identifying critically important vascular access outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals. Nephrol Dial Transplant2020; 35: 657–668.
2.
HimmelfarbJIkizlerTAHimmelfarbJ, et al. Quantitating urea removal in patients with acute renal failure: lost art or forgotten science?Semin Dial2000; 13: 147–149.
3.
BlaggCR.The early history of dialysis for chronic renal failure in the United States: a view from Seattle. Am J Kidney Dis2007; 3: 482–496.
4.
BlaggCR.From miracle to mainstream: creating the world’s first dialysis organization: early years of Northwest Kidney Centers. Seattle, WA: Northwest Kidney Centers, 2017.
5.
BoeninkRBonthuisMBoerstraBA, et al. The ERA Registry Annual Report 2022: epidemiology of kidney replacement therapy in Europe, with a focus on sex comparisons. Clin Kidney J2024; 18(2): sfae405.
6.
TsengCHHuIAChenIT, et al. Beyond prevalence: significance and differential impact of echocardiographic abnormalities in dialysis patients. J Nephrol2024; 37(5): 1261–1271.
7.
PisoniRZepelLFluckR, et al. International differences in the location and use of arteriovenous accesses created for hemodialysis: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis2018; 71: 469–478.
8.
ShahNAHindMEZoltanHE, et al. A change of heart: the effect of high flow arteriovenous fistulas on cardiovascular outcomes - a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM). BMC Nephrol2025; 26: 394–403.
9.
GuytonACSagawaK.Compensations of cardiac output and other circulatory functions in areflex dogs with large A-V fistulas. Am J Physiol1961; 200: 1157–1163.
10.
StathopoulouMTsimpoukis, TasiosK, et al. Cardiac complications of arteriovenous access: a narrative review from a multidisciplinary team perspective. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis2024; 9: e217–e225.
11.
BasileCLomonteCVernaglioneL, et al. The relationship between the flow of arteriovenous fistula and cardiac output in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant2008; 23: 282–287.
12.
AalaASharifSParikhL, et al. High-output cardiac failure and coronary steal with an arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis2018; 71: 896–903.
13.
SequeiraATanTW.Complications of a high-flow access and its management. Semin Dial2015; 28: 533–543.
14.
MacRaeJMLevinABelenkieI.The cardiovascular effects of arteriovenous fistulas in chronic kidney disease: a cause for concern?Semin Dial2006; 19: 349–352.
15.
SongWWuLSunC, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation following arteriovenous fistula increases adverse clinical events in dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease. Front Cardiovasc Med2024; 11: 1–8.
16.
VálekMLopotFPolakovičV.Arteriovenous fistula, blood flow, cardiac output and left ventricle load in hemodialysis patients. ASAIO J2010; 56: 200–203.
17.
BasileCVernaglioneLCasucciF, et al. The impact of haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula on haemodynamic parameters of the cardiovascular system. Clin Kidney J2016; 9: 729–734.
18.
PucchioAMcIntyreCLokC, et al. Cardiac implications of upper-arm arteriovenous fistulas: a case series. J Vasc Access2023; 24: 1078–1083.
19.
ChoiYSLeeIJAnJN, et al. High-flow arteriovenous fistula and myocardial fibrosis in hemodialysis patients with non-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Front Cardiovasc Med2022; 9: 922593.
20.
ParkSShinS.Management of high-flow arteriovenous access. Kidney Res Clin Pract2025; 44: 58–68.
21.
LokCEHuberTSLeeT, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis2020; 75(Suppl. 2): S1–S164.
22.
IbeasJRoca-TeyRVallespinJ, et al. Spanish clinical guidelines on vascular access for haemodialysis. Nefrologia2017; 37 Suppl 1: 1–191.
23.
MacRaeJPandeyaSHumenD, et al. Arteriovenous fistula-associated high-output cardiac failure: a review of mechanisms. Am J Kidney Dis2004; 43(5): e17–e22.
24.
BasileCLomonteC.The complex relationship among arteriovenous access, heart, and circulation. Semin Dial2018; 31: 15–20.
25.
MalikJLomonteCRotmansJ, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access affects heart function and outcomes: tips for choosing the right access for the individual patient. J Vasc Access2021; 22(1 suppl): 32–41.
26.
FarringtonCARobbinMLeeT, et al. Early predictors of arteriovenous fistula maturation: a novel perspective on an enduring problem. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2020; 31: 1617–1627.
27.
HentschelDM.Determinants of arteriovenous fistula maturation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2018; 13(9): 1307–1308.
28.
KimJJGiffordENguyenV, et al. Increased use of brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas improves functional primary patency. J Vasc Surg2015; 62: 442–447.
29.
BeginVEthierJDumontM, et al. Prospective evaluation of the intra-access flow of recently created native arteriovenous fistulae. Am J Kidney Dis2002; 40: 1277–1282.
30.
HouseAAWannerCSarnakMJ, et al. Heart failure in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int2019; 95(6): 1304–1317.
31.
LokCYouTLeeT, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access: core curriculum 2025. Am J Kidney Dis2025; 85: 236–252.
32.
Martínez-GallardoRFerreira-MorongFGarcía-PinoG, et al. Congestive heart failure in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: association with pre-emptive vascular access placement. Nefrologia2012; 32: 206–212.
33.
KonnerKLomonteCBasileC.Placing a primary arteriovenous fistula that works—more or less known aspects, new ideas. Nephrol Dial Transplant2013; 28: 781–784.
34.
BresciaMJCiminoJEAppelK, et al. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med1966; 275: 1089–1092.
35.
KonnerK.The initial creation of native arteriovenous fistulas: surgical aspects and their impact on the practice of nephrology. Semin Dial2003; 4: 291–298.
36.
TurnerMAMathlouthiAPatelRJ, et al. Small arteriovenous anastomosis in fistula creation: establishing a functional vascular access while minimizing steal syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg2024; 99: 142–147.
37.
ZahraSAChoudhuryRYBasharatK, et al. Translational sciences in cardiac failure secondary to arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients. Ann Vasc Surg2021; 74: 431–449.
38.
AhnHYByung SunCHyeyoungK, et al. Effect of radiocephalic anastomotic length on the maturation of arteriovenous fistula. Ann Vasc Surg2022; 82: 334–338.
39.
KimYKimJHWooJ, et al. Hemodynamic adaptation and cardiac effects of high-flow arteriovenous access in hemodialysis patients: a prospective study. J Clin Med2025; 14: 4556.
40.
AndersonCBEtheredgeEEHarterHR, et al. Local blood flow characteristics of arteriovenous fistulas in the forearm for dialysis. Surg Gynecol Obstet1977; 144: 531–533.
41.
Zahra BenderMHBruyninckxCMGerlagPC.The Gracz arteriovenous fistula evaluated. Results of the brachiocephalic elbow fistula in hemodialysis angio-access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1995; 10: 294–297.
42.
BharatAJaenickeMShenoyS.A novel technique of vascular anastomosis to prevent juxta-anastomotic stenosis following arteriovenous fistula creation. J Vasc Surg2012; 55: 274–280.
43.
ShahverdyanRBeathardGMusthaqN, et al. Comparison of ellipsys percutaneous and proximal forearm Gracz-type surgical arteriovenous fistulas. Am J Kidney Dis2021; 78: 520–529.
44.
LokCRajanDClementJ, et al. Endovascular proximal forearm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access: results of the prospective, multicenter novel endovascular access trial (NEAT). Am J Kidney Dis2017; 70: 486–497.
45.
MalliosAJenningsWBouraB, et al. Early results of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation with the Ellipsys Vascular Access System. J Vasc Surg2018; 68: 1150–1156.
46.
FrancoGMalliosABourquelotP, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of percutaneously created arteriovenous fistulae between radial artery and perforating vein at the elbow. J Vasc Access2020; 5: 694–700.
47.
Van CanneytKPourchezTElootS, et al. Hemodynamic impact of anastomosis size and angle in side-to-end arteriovenous fistulae: a computer analysis. J Vasc Access2010; 11: 52–58.
48.
HullGEBalakinBVKellermanBM, et al. Computational fluid dynamic evaluation of the side-to-side anastomosis for arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Surg2013; 58: 187–193.
