Venipuncture is a routine procedure in hospital clinical practice; however, procedural failure occurs frequently. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize studies predicting difficult intravenous venous access (DIVA) in adult patients in hospital settings.
Methods:
A scoping review was conducted across major biomedical databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL, from June to July 2024. Twelve records were included covering 11,841 adult inpatients. Methodological rigor was ensured using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.
Results:
The findings emphasized the impact of variables such as venous status, underlying conditions, and anthropometric factors on venipuncture success. Predictive scales like the A-DIVA, EA-DIVA, and Modified A-DIVA demonstrated accuracies of up to 97%.
Discussion:
Predictive tools, especially the Modified A-DIVA scale, enhance the likelihood of first-attempt success and support clinical decision-making. Incorporating these tools into routine practice ensures effective venipuncture management, reduces procedural delays, and minimizes complications.
MasottoMBrivioRDe VitoG, et al. Pre-analytical errors in blood sampling: an observational study on specimen collection technique and laboratory results. Assist Inferm Ric2015; 34(2): 76–85.
3.
MingweiNKwok FaiMLLateefF.Management of difficult intravenous access: a qualitative review. World J Emerg Med2022; 13(6): 467–478.
4.
Jean-LouisVMooreFABellomoRMariniJJ. Textbook of critical care (8th edition). Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA; 2024.
5.
PermanSMElmerJMacielCB, et al. 2023 American Heart Association focused update on adult advanced cardiovascular life support: an update to the American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation2024; 149(5): e254–e273.
6.
WittingMDMoayediSYangZ, et al. Advanced intravenous access: technique choices, pain scores, and failure rates in a local registry. Am J Emerg Med2016; 34(3): 553–557.
7.
GalloMLodiniRDestrebecqA, et al. L’accesso intraosseo in emergenza/urgenza: revisione della letteratura. Scenario2014; 31(2): 35.
8.
CostantinoTGKirtzJFSatzWA.Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access vs. the external jugular vein as the initial approach to the patient with difficult vascular access. J Emerg Med2010; 39(4): 462–467.
9.
GuptaBKakkarKGuptaA, et al. Advik technique’ of peripheral intravenous cannulation different perspective in difficult situations. ARC J Anesthesiol2017; 2: 5–6.
10.
AponteHAcostaSRigamontiD, et al. The use of ultrasound for placement of intravenous catheters. AANA J2007; 75(3): 212–216.
11.
CookeMUllmanAJRay-BarruelG, et al. Not “just” an intravenous line: consumer perspectives on peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC). An international cross-sectional survey of 25 countries. PLoS One2018; 13(2): e0193436.
12.
HelmRKlausnerJKlempererJ, et al. Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs2015; 38(3): 189–203.
13.
WebsterJOsborneSRickardCM, et al. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 4: CD007798.
14.
RikerMWKennedyCWinfreyBS, et al. Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Acad Emerg Med2011; 18(11): 1129–1134.
15.
PattersonPHussaAAFedeleKA, et al. Comparison of 4 analgesic agents for venipuncture. AANA J2000; 68(1): 43–51.
16.
BahlAJohnsonSAlsbrooksK, et al. Defining difficult intravenous access (DIVA): a systematic review. J Vasc Access2023; 24(5): 904–910.
17.
ThomasCCabilanCJJohnstonANB. Peripheral intravenous cannula insertion and use in a tertiary hospital emergency department: A cross-sectional study. Australas Emerg Care. 2020Sep; 23(3): 166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 2. PMID: 32139321.
18.
KhalilHBennettMGodfreyC, et al. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. Int J Evid Based Healthc2020; 18(1): 95–100.
19.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med2018; 169(7): 467–473.
20.
SguanciMMancinSPireddaM, et al. Protocol for conducting a systematic review on diagnostic accuracy in clinical research. MethodsX2024; 12: 102569.
21.
CivettaGCortesiSMancardiM, et al. EA-DIVA score (Enhanced Adult DIVA score): a new scale to predict difficult preoperative venous cannulation in adult surgical patients. J Vasc Access2019; 20(3): 281–289.
22.
PireddaMFioriniJFacchinettiG, et al. Risk factors for a difficult intravenous access: a multicentre study comparing nurses’ beliefs to evidence. J Clin Nurs2019; 28(19–20): 3492–3504.
23.
SlosseCMannevilleFRicciL, et al. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for peripheral venous catheter placement (ALCOV): protocol for a quasi-experimental study. BMJ Open2024; 14(6): e078002.
24.
SebbaneMClaretPGLefebvreS, et al. Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. J Emerg Med2013; 44(2): 299–305.
25.
FieldsJMPielaNEAuAK, et al. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med2014; 32(10): 1179–1182.
26.
Armenteros-YeguasVGárate-EcheniqueLTomás-LópezMA, et al. Prevalence of difficult venous access and associated risk factors in highly complex hospitalised patients. J Clin Nurs2017; 26(23–24): 4267–4275.
27.
YalçınlıSAkarcaFKCanÖ, et al. Factors affecting the first-attempt success rate of intravenous cannulation in older people. J Clin Nurs2019; 28(11): 2206–2213.
28.
Van LoonFHJVan HoofLWEDe BoerHD, et al. The modified A-DIVA scale as a predictive tool for prospective identification of adult patients at risk of a difficult intravenous access: a multicenter validation study. J Clin Med2019; 8(2): 144.
29.
CarrPJRippeyJCRCookeML, et al. Factors associated with peripheral intravenous cannulation first-time insertion success in the emergency department. A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of patient, clinician and product characteristics. BMJ Open2019; 9(4): e022278.
30.
CarrPJHigginsNSCookeML, et al. Tools, clinical prediction rules, and algorithms for the insertion of peripheral intravenous catheters in adult hospitalized patients: a systematic scoping review of literature. J Hosp Med2017; 12(10): 851–858.
31.
MarshNWebsterJLarsenE, et al. Observational study of peripheral intravenous catheter outcomes in adult hospitalized patients: a multivariable analysis of peripheral intravenous catheter failure. J Hosp Med2018; 13(2): 83–89.
32.
Van LoonFHJPuijn LisetteAPMBouwmanARA, et al. Development of the A-DIVA scale: a clinical predictive scale to identify difficult intravenous access in adult patients based on clinical observations. Medicine (Baltimore)2016; 95(16): e3428.
33.
Alexander, Mary, Ann Corrigan, and Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion Nursing : An Evidence-Based Approach. 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Saunders/Elsevier, 2010. Print.
BlanchardKWendtR.The role of radiologic technologists in the placement of intravenous catheters for imaging studies. Radiol Technol2014; 85(5): 486–492.
36.
YatesL.Intravenous access: a critical skill for midwives. Br J Midwifery2015; 23(2): 124–128.
37.
CarrPJRippeyJCRBudgeonCA, et al. Insertion of peripheral intravenous cannulae in the emergency department: factors associated with first-time insertion success. J Vasc Access2016; 17(2): 182–190.
38.
SaadTF. Vein preservation and alternative venous access: exploring the options for patients with chronic kidney disease. Endovascular Today. 2008June; 7(6). Available from: https://evtoday.com/articles/2008-june/EVT0608_03-php
39.
AhmedMKhanF. Integrating artificial intelligence into clinical training and practice. Medical Informatics Journal. 2022; 56: 1295–1305.
40.
KimMJParkJMRheeN, et al. Efficacy of near-infrared light devices for peripheral intravenous access in children: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr2012; 171(7): 1121–1125.
41.
FreyAM.Success rates for peripheral IV insertion in children. Pediatr Nurs1998; 24(1): 33–38.
42.
RizzoAKoenigST.Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime?Neuropsychology2017; 31(8): 877–899.
43.
Van LoonW. Improving vascular access with AI: a new era in clinical practice. J Clin Nurs2020; 29: 560–570.
44.
HuangY.AI and deep learning in medical imaging: a new frontier for healthcare. J Healthc Eng2019: 1–12.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
