The use of precise and unequivocal terminology is crucial in clinical and scientific communication. A frequent source of error involves the anatomical confusion between the axillary vein and the subclavian vein. Anatomically, the transition from the axillary vein to the subclavian vein occurs at the lateral border of the first rib, beneath the clavicle. Consequently, the vessel typically visualized by ultrasound in the infraclavicular region is the axillary vein, not the subclavian vein. Nevertheless, numerous international guidelines and clinical studies continue to misidentify the thoracic segment of the axillary vein as the “subclavian vein.” This persistent mislabeling hinders the international standardization of ultrasound-guided procedures, complicates the comparison of various techniques, and—most importantly—risks misinterpretation of evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.
BuettiNMarschallJDreesM, et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2022; 43(5): 553–569. DOI: 10.1177/1129729819826034.
2.
NickelBGorskiLKleidonT, et al. Infusion therapy standards of practice, 9th edition. J Infus Nurs2024; 47(1S Suppl 1): S1–S285. DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000532.
3.
PinelliFPittirutiMAnnettaMG, et al. A GAVeCeLT consensus on the indication, insertion, and management of central venous access devices in the critically ill. J Vasc Access2024; 42: 11297298241262932. DOI: 10.1177/11297298241262932.
AnnettaMGSpencerTRPittirutiM.Puncture site versus exit site in central venous access procedures: still a source of confusion. J Vasc Access2025; 5: 11297298251338968. DOI: 10.1177/11297298251338968.
6.
Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 42nd edition. StandringS. (editor in chief), Elsevier, New York, 2020.
7.
GallowaySBodenhamA.Ultrasound imaging of the axillary vein—anatomical basis for central venous access. Br J Anaesth2003; 90(5): 589–595. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg094.
8.
Franco-SadudRSchnobrichDMathewsBK, et al. Recommendations on the use of ultrasound guidance for central and peripheral vascular access in adults: a position statement of the society of hospital medicine. J Hosp Med2019; 14(9): E1–E22. DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3287.
9.
LampertiMBiasucciDGDismaN, et al. European society of anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access). Eur J Anaesthesiol2020; 37(5): 344–376. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001180.
10.
VegasAWellsBBraumP, et al. Guidelines for performing ultrasound-guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2025; 38(2): 57–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.12.004.
11.
SpencerTRPittirutiM.Rapid central vein assessment (RaCeVA): a systematic, standardized approach for ultrasound assessment before central venous catheterization. J Vasc Access2019; 20(3): 239–249. DOI: 10.1177/1129729818804718.
12.
ZarskusAZykuteDLukoseviciusS, et al. Precise terminology and specified catheter insertion length in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular central vein catheterization. Medicina (Kaunas)2023; 60(1): 28. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010028.
13.
LeDonneJ.The dominant vein in the infraclavicular fossa is the axillary vein, not the subclavian. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2012; 25(6): 697. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.01.021.
GawdaRCzarnikT.Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular cannulation of the subclavian vein - still an ongoing misconception. J Intensive Care Soc2023; 24(3 Suppl): 10. DOI: 10.1177/1751143720914188.
16.
TimsitJFRuppMBouzaE, et al. A state-of-the-art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med2018; 44(6): 742–759. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5212-y.
17.
TimsitJFBaleineJBernardL, et al. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care2020; 10(1): 118. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4.
18.
TimsitJFTabahAMimozO.Update on prevention of intra-vascular accesses complications. Intensive Care Med2022; 48: 1422–1425. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06763-5.
19.
O’GradyNP.Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections. N Engl J Med2023; 389(12): 1121–1131. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra2213296.
20.
GualtieriEDeppeSASipperlyME, et al. Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med1995; 23(4): 692–697.
21.
ParientiJJMongardonNMégarbaneB, et al. 3SITES Study Group. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med2015; 373(13): 1220–1229. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500964.
22.
SenussiMHKantamneniPCOmranianA, et al. Revisiting ultrasound-guided subclavian/axillary vein cannulations: importance of pleural avoidance with rib trajectory. J Intensive Care Med2017; 32(6): 396–399. DOI: 10.1177/0885066617701413.
23.
VezzaniAMancaTBrusascoC, et al. A randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided infra-clavicular cannulation of the subclavian vein in cardiac surgical patients: short-axis versus long-axis approach. Intensive Care Med2017; 43(11): 1594–1601. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4756-6.
24.
DaviesTWMontgomeryHGilbert-KawaiE.Cannulation of the subclavian vein using real-time ultrasound guidance. J Intensive Care Soc2020; 21(4): 349–354. DOI: 10.1177/1751143720901403.
25.
SainiVVamsidharASamraT, et al. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterizations in adult patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol2022; 38(3): 411–416. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_400_20.
26.
KimYJMaSYoonHK, et al. Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for ultrasound-guided right subclavian venous catheterisation: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Anaesthesia2022; 77(1): 59–65. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15525.
27.
AdrianMBorgquistOKrögerT, et al. Mechanical complications after central venous catheterisation in the ultrasound-guided era: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Br J Anaesth2022; 129(6): 843–850. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.036.
28.
ZawadkaMLa ViaLWongA, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance as compared with landmark technique for subclavian central venous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Crit Care Med2023; 51(5): 642–652. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005819.
29.
Hosur RavikumarRMajageSPrasannaM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound guided supraclavicular subclavian vein versus infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein catheterization: a systematic review and meta analysis. J Vasc Access2025; 26(2): 633–640. DOI: 10.1177/11297298241239092.
30.
SandhuNS.Transpectoral ultrasound-guided catheterization of the axillary vein: an alternative to standard catheterization of the subclavian vein. Anesth Analg2004; 99(1): 183–187. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000117283.09234.2C.
31.
SharmaABodenhamARMallickA.Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary vein cannulation for central venous access. Br J Anaesth2004; 93(2): 188–192. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh187.
32.
LanspaMJFairJHirshbergEL, et al. Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation using a micro-convex ultrasound probe. Ann Am Thorac Soc2014; 11(4): 583–586. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-414B.
33.
StachuraMRSocranskySJWissR, et al. A comparison of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular views for imaging the subclavian vein with ultrasound. Am J Emerg Med2014; 32(8): 905–908. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.001.
34.
GawdaRCzarnikTŁysenkoL.Infraclavicular access to the axillary vein - new possibilities for the catheterization of the central veins in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther2016; 48(5): 360–366. DOI: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0055.
35.
KosińskiSPodsiadłoPStachowiczJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided, long-axis, in-plane, infraclavicular axillary vein cannulation: a 6-year experience. J Vasc Access2023; 24(4): 754–761. DOI: 10.1177/11297298211054629.
36.
YaoMXiongWXuL, et al. A modified approach for ultrasound-guided axillary venipuncture in the infraclavicular area: a retrospective observational study. J Vasc Access2019; 20(6): 630–635. DOI: 10.1177/1129729819838135.
37.
BresciaFBiasucciDGFabianiF, et al. A novel ultrasound-guided approach to the axillary vein: oblique-axis view combined with in-plane puncture. J Vasc Access2019; 20(6): 763–768. DOI: 10.1177/1129729819826034.
38.
PittirutiMBiasucciDGLa GrecaA, et al. How to make the axillary vein larger? Effect of 90° abduction of the arm to facilitate ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture. J Crit Care2016; 33: 38–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.12.018.
39.
KulandyanIVelrajJMurugesanR, et al. Sonographic visualization and cannulation of the axillary vein in two arm positions during mechanical ventilation: a randomized trial. J Vasc Access2020; 21(2): 210–216. DOI: 10.1177/1129729819869504.
40.
WangHYShengRMGaoYD, et al. Ultrasound-guided proximal versus distal axillary vein puncture in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Access2020; 21(6): 854–860. DOI: 10.1177/1129729820904866.
41.
SuYHouJYMaGG, et al. Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA. in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care2020; 10(1): 90. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6.
42.
TivnanPNanneryMEpelboymY, et al. Single center experience with ultrasound guided axillary vein port placement. J Vasc Access2022; 23(5): 706–709. DOI: 10.1177/11297298211008094.
43.
CzarnikTCzuczwarMBorysM, et al. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary vein versus internal jugular vein cannulation in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized trial. Crit Care Med2023; 51(2): e37–e44. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005740.
44.
FournilCBouletNBastideS, et al. High success rates of ultrasound-guided distal internal jugular vein and axillary vein approaches for central venous catheterization: A randomized controlled open-label pilot trial. J Clin Ultrasound2023; 51(1): 158–166. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23383.
45.
ZhouJWuLZhangC, et al. Ultrasound guided axillary vein catheterization versus subclavian vein cannulation with landmark technique: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine2022; 101(43): e31509. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031509.
46.
DelucaGMassariVFMMusaicoF, et al. Ultrasound-guided venipuncture for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center, retrospective study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2020; 43(7): 713–719. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13961.
47.
TagliariAPKochiANMastellaB, et al. Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture in cardiac lead implantation: time to move to a new standard access?Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev2020; 9(2): 78–82. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2020.17.
48.
TagliariAPKochiANSaadiRP, et al. Insights from the axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound versus cephalic vein dissection trial. Future Cardiol2021; 17(6): 923–929. DOI: 10.2217/fca-2020-0190.
49.
MaffèSPaffoniPDi NardoF, et al. Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac device implantation: a safe and effective approach. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag2023; 14(4): 5410-5419. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2023.14045.
50.
D’ArrigoSPernaFAnnettaMG, et al. Ultrasound-guided access to the axillary vein for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Access2023; 24(4): 854–863. DOI: 10.1177/11297298211054621.
51.
CharlesPDitacGMontoyM, et al. Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial. Eur Heart J2023; 44(46): 4847–4858. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad629.
52.
VitaliFMalagùMBianchiN, et al. Ultrasound- guided venous axillary versus standard fluoroscopic technique for cardiac lead implantation: ZEROFLUOROAXI randomized trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol2024; 10(3): 554–565. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.11.020.
53.
VitaliFZuinMCharlesP, et al. Ultrasound-guided vs. fluoro-guided axillary venous access for cardiac implantable electronic devices: a patient-based meta-analysis. Europace2024; 26(11): euae274. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae274.
54.
VettaGParlavecchioAWrightJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a meta-analysis enrolling 1257 patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol2025; 68(3): 589–596. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01932-6.
55.
MenezesADSJrBarbosaGAMartins SantosCK, et al. Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac device implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol Rev2025; 4: 10–97. DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000909.
56.
PernaFFloreFTelescaA, et al. Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture versus landmark-guided approach for cardiac implantable electronic device placement. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2025; 48(1): 9–20. DOI: 10.1111/pace.15107.
57.
McGeeDCGouldMK.Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med2003; 348(12): 1123–1133. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra011883.
58.
FragouMGravvanisADimitriouV, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med2011; 39(7): 1607–1612. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a1ae.
