Abstract
Background:
The basilic vein transposition is a brachio basilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) made after the mobilization and transferring of basilic vein to the ventral aspect of arm inside a subcutaneous pocket by direct dissection. The procedure can be performed either in single stage or two stages. This study compares the clinical efficacy and long term utility of single-stage and two-stage basilic vein transposition among patients of renal failure and to evaluate failure rate, primary patency rates, and postoperative complications.
Method:
Patients who underwent basilic vein transposition at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to single stage or two-stage procedure. After the surgical procedure, assessment of fistula maturation and surveillance were undertaken using ultrasound and physical examination. Patients were requested to visit the out-patient clinic for assessment of fistula patency and post-operative complications at regular intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months respectively.
Result:
During the 12 months’ interval, 82 (39.04%) basilic vein transpositions were performed in single-stage and 128 (60.95%) were two-staged transposition. In our analysis we have found that as compared to single stage, two-stage basilic vein transpositions showed significantly better primary patency rates (76.82% vs 96%; p-value 0.000) and required less interventions for maintaining fistula patency. More post-operative sequelae were noted in the single stage version of the procedure as compared to the two stage procedure.
Conclusion:
Two stage procedure of basilic vein transposition is found to have better patency rate and lesser post-surgical complications. However, a matched cohort prospective study is still needed to further strengthen the conclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.