A randomised trial of intracavitary electrocardiography versus surface landmark measurement for central venous access device placement

Abstract

Background:

Malpositioned central venous access devices (CVADs) can lead to significant patient injury including central vein thrombosis and dysrhythmias. Intra-cavitary electrocardiography (IC ECG) has been recommended by peak professional bodies as an accurate alternative for bedside CVAD insertion, to reduce risk of malposition and allowing immediate use of the device. Our objective was to compare the effect of IC ECG on CVAD malposition compared to traditional institutional practice for CVAD placement.

Methods:

Randomised controlled trial of IC ECG CVAD insertion verses traditional CVAD insertion (surface landmark measurement with post insertion x ray). Patient recruitment was from December 2016 to July 2018. The setting was a 900-bed tertiary referral hospital based in South Western Sydney, Australia. Three hundred and forty-four adult patients requiring CVAD insertion for intravenous therapy, were enrolled and randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either IC-ECG (n = 172) or traditional (n = 172) CVAD insertion. Our primary outcome of interest was the rate of catheters not requiring repositioning after insertion (ready for use). Secondary outcomes were comparison of procedure time and cost.

Results:

Of the 172 patients allocated to the IC ECG method, 170 (99%) were ready for use immediately compared to 139 of the 172 (81%) in the traditional insertion group (difference, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18%, 11.9–24.1%). The total procedure time was mean 15 min (SD 8 min) for IC ECG and mean 36 min (SD 17 min) for traditional CVAD insertion (difference–19.9 min (95% CI–14.6 to −34.4). IC ECG guided CVAD insertion had a cost reduction of AUD $62.00 per procedure.

Conclusions:

Using IC-ECG resulted in nearly no requirement for post-insertion repositioning of CVADs resulting in savings in time and cost and virtually eliminating the need for radiographic confirmation.

Trial registration:

This trial is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.anzctr.org.au). The registration number is ACTRN12620000919910.

Keywords

Central venous access device intracavitary ECG catheter tip confirmation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Walker

Todd

. Nurse-led PICC insertion: is it cost effective? Br J Nurs 2013; 22(Sup19): S9–S15.

Tomaszewski

Ferko

Hollmann

, et al. Time and resources of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion procedures: a comparison between blind insertion/chest X-ray and a real time tip navigation and confirmation system. Clin Econom Outcomes Res 2017; 9: 115.

Bidgood

. Improving the patient experience with real-time PICC placement confirmation. Br J Nurs 2016; 25(10): 539–543.

Cavallazzi

Pan

, et al. Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012(3): CD004084.

Kowalski

Kaufman

Rivitz

, et al. Migration of central venous catheters: implications for initial catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8(3): 443–447.

Pittiruti

La Greca

Scoppettuolo

. The electrocardiographic method for positioning the tip of central venous catheters. J Vasc Access. 2011; 12(4): 280–291.

Hostetter

Nakasawa

Tompkins

, et al. Precision in central venous catheter tip placement: a review of the literature. J Assoc Vasc Access 2010; 15(3): 112–125.

O’grady

Alexander

Burns

, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clinical Infect Dis 2011; 52(9): e162–e193.

Timsit

J-F

Bouadma

Ruckly

, et al. Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections. Crit Care Med 2012; 40(6): 1707–1714.

10.

McGee

Gould

. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(12): 1123–1133.

11.

Walker

Alexandrou

Rickard

, et al. Effectiveness of electrocardiographic guidance in CVAD tip placement. Brit J Nurs 2015; 24(Sup14): S4–S12.

12.

Pittiruti

Scoppettuolo

Dolcetti

, et al. Clinical use of Sherlock-3CG® for positioning peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Access. 2019; 20(4): 356–361.

13.

Yuan

Meng

, et al. Superior success rate of intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter placement in patients with cancer: a randomized open-label controlled multicenter study. PloS One. 2017; 12(3): e0171630.

14.

Jiao

Zhang

, et al. A randomized controlled study of bedside electrocardiograph-guided tip location technique & the traditional chest radiography tip location technique for peripherally inserted central venous catheter in cancer patients. Indian J Med Res. 2018; 147(5): 477.

15.

Ling

Chen

Tang

, et al. Accuracy and safety study of intracavitary electrocardiographic guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter placement in neonates. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2019; 33(1): 89–95.

16.

Pittiruti

Pelagatti

Pinelli

. Intracavitary electrocardiography for tip location during central venous catheterization: a narrative review of 70 years of clinical studies. J Vasc Access 2021; 22(5): 778–785.

17.

Schulz

Altman

Moher

. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010; 8(1): 18.

18.

Petrou

Gray

. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2011; 342: d1548.

19.

Association

. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014; 81(3): 14–18.

20.

Tingley

Hirose

Keele

Imai

. mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. R package version 4.4.2. 2013. J Statist Software 2014; 59(5): 1–38. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mediation.

21.

Albrecht

Nave

Breitmeier

, et al. Applied anatomy of the superior vena cava—the carina as a landmark to guide central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92(1): 75–77.

22.

Stonelake

Bodenham

. The carina as a radiological landmark for central venous catheter tip position. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96(3): 335–340.

23.

Schuster

Nave

Piepenbrock

, et al. The carina as a landmark in central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85(2): 192–194.

24.

Pittiruti

Bertollo

Briglia

, et al. The intracavitary ECG method for positioning the tip of central venous catheters: results of an Italian multicenter study. J Vasc Access 2012; 13(3): 357–365.

25.

Alexandrou

Spencer

Frost

, et al. Central venous catheter placement by advanced practice nurses demonstrates low procedural complication and infection rates—a report from 13 years of service. Crit Care Med 2014; 42(3): 536–543.

26.

Altman

. Practical statistics for medical research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1990.

27.

Keller

Aragona

Molina

, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a guided peripherally inserted central catheter placement system: a single-center cohort study. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 30(5): 709–714.

28.

Rossetti

Pittiruti

Lamperti

, et al. The intracavitary ECG method for positioning the tip of central venous access devices in pediatric patients: results of an Italian multicenter study. J Vasc Access 2015; 16(2): 137–143.

29.

Yin

Y-X

Gao

X-Y

, et al. Insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters with intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance: a randomized multicenter study in China. J Vasc Access 2019; 20(5): 524–529.

30.

Liu

Hou

Zhou

, et al. Meta-analysis of intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter placement. J Vasc Access 2019; 20(6): 577–582.

31.

Yuan

. The electrocardiographic method for positioning the tip of central venous access device. J Vasc Access 2011; 12(4): 280–291.

32.

Barnwal

Dave

Dias

. A comparative study of two techniques (electrocardiogram-and landmark-guided) for correct depth of the central venous catheter placement in paediatric patients undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2016; 60(7): 470.

33.

Fricke

Racadio

Duckworth

, et al. Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters without fluoroscopy in children: initial catheter tip position. Radiology 2005; 234(3): 887–892.

34.

Trerotola

Thompson

Chittams

, et al. Analysis of tip malposition and correction in peripherally inserted central catheters placed at bedside by a dedicated nursing team. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18(4): 513–518.

35.

Hill

Moureau

. Tip position. Vessel Health and Preservation: The Right Approach for Vascular Access. Cham: Springer; 2019, pp.81–105.

36.

Malek

Raad

. Preventing catheter-related infections in cancer patients: a review of current strategies. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18(6): 531–538.

37.

Schweickert

Herlitz

Pohlman

, et al. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating postinsertion neck ultrasound in peripherally inserted central catheter procedures. Crit Care Med 2009; 37(4): 1217–1221.

38.

Weekes

Johnson

Keller

, et al. Central vascular catheter placement evaluation using saline flush and bedside echocardiography. Acad Emerg Med 2014; 21(1): 65–72.

39.

Gekle

Dubensky

Haddad

, et al. Saline flush test: can bedside sonography replace conventional radiography for confirmation of above-the-diaphragm central venous catheter placement? J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34(7): 1295–1299.

40.

Ender

Erdoes

Krohmer

, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography for verification of the position of the electrocardiographically-placed central venous catheter. J Cardioth Vasc Anesth 2009; 23(4): 457–461.

41.

Greca

Iacobone

Elisei

, et al. ECHOTIP: a structured protocol for ultrasound-based tip navigation and tip location during placement of central venous access devices in adult patients. London, England: SAGE Publications, 2021. p. 11297298211044325.

42.

Gao

Liu

Zhang

, et al. The safety and accuracy of ECG-guided PICC tip position verification applied in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018; 14: 1075.