Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer

Abstract

Purpose:

Totally implantable venous access ports are widely used in chemotherapy for malignant tumors. This retrospective study investigated the safety, technical feasibility, and device-related complications of totally implantable venous access ports implanted in the upper arm.

Methods:

Between May 2016 and June 2018, 570 women with early breast cancer received chemotherapy and were successfully implanted with a totally implantable venous access port in the upper arm. Device-related complications were collected and influencing factors were analyzed for major complications.

Results:

Only one case underwent premature port removal before the end of chemotherapy. Device-related complications were observed in 32 cases, including 31 late complications. The rate of complications was 0.263/1000 catheter-days. Infection and thrombosis were the most common complications, occurring in 13 and 8 cases, respectively. Other complications were catheter occlusion, catheter dislocation, arrhythmia, and so on. Patients with higher body mass index were significantly more prone to infection and those who experienced catheter-related thrombosis had longer implantation times and higher body mass indices.

Conclusion:

Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer, with a low rate of complications, providing good alternative to central venous ports.

Keywords

Totally implantable venous access ports breast cancer upper arm chemotherapy complications

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kreis

Loehberg

Lux

, et al. Patients’ attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33(1): 39–43.

Vescia

Baumgartner

Jacobs

, et al. Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Ann Oncol 2008; 19(1): 9–15.

Boyd

Paul

, et al. Hickman catheter and implantable port devices for the delivery of chemotherapy: a phase II randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Br J Cancer 2016; 114(9): 979–985.

INS. Infusion therapy standards of practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2016; 39(1S): S1–S159.

Niederhuber

Ensminger

Gyves

, et al. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 1982; 92(4): 706–712.

Starkhammar

Bengtsson

Gain

, et al. A new injection portal for brachially inserted central venous catheter. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 1990; 7(4): 281–285.

Zhang

QX.

Comparison of complications between peripheral arm ports and central chest ports: a meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74(11): 2484–2496.

Pittiruti

Bertollo

Briglia

, et al. The intracavitary ECG method for positioning the tip of central venous catheters: results of an Italian multicenter study. J Vasc Access 2012; 13(3): 357–365.

Lin

Chu

, et al. Use of a totally implantable access port through the external jugular vein when the cephalic vein approach is not feasible. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25(2): 217–221.

10.

Goltz

Noack

Petritsch

, et al. Totally implantable venous power ports of the forearm and the chest: initial clinical experience with port devices approved for high-pressure injections. Br J Radiol 2012; 85(1019): e966–e972.

11.

Butros

Walker

Salazar

, et al. Direct translumbar inferior vena cava ports for long-term central venous access in patients with cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25(4): 556–560.

12.

Sofocleous

Schur

Cooper

, et al. Sonographically guided placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters: review of 355 procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170(6): 1613–1616.

13.

Neuman

Murphy

Rosen

MP.

Bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1998; 206(2): 423–428.

14.

Cil

Canyigit

Peynircioglu

, et al. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006; 12(2): 93–98.

15.

Lorch

Zwaan

Kagel

, et al. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 24(3): 180–184.

16.

Busch

Herrmann

Heller

, et al. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199(2): 447–452.

17.

Yang

Ahn

MS.

A comparison between upper arm and chest for optimal site of totally implanted venous access ports in patients with female breast cancer. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 50: 128–134.

18.

Sutherland

Weitz

Liebman

HA.

Thromboembolic complications of cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Hematol 2003; 72(1): 43–52.

19.

Mori

Nagayama

Kawamura

, et al. A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute. Int J Clin Oncol 2016; 21(3): 474–482.