AshS.R.. The evolution and function of central venous access for dialysis.Semin Dial2001; 14: 416–24.
2.
CanaudB., BeraudJ., JoyeuxH., MionC.. Internal jugular vein cannulation with two silicone rubber catheters: a new and safe temporary vascular access for hemodialysis - thirty months’ experience.Artif Organs1986; 10: 397–403.
3.
DwyerH.O., FotheringhamT., O'KellyP.A prospective comparison of two types of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: the Ash Split versus the PermCath.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2005; 28: 23–9.
4.
RichardH.M., HastingsG., Boyd-KranisR.L.A randomized, prospective evaluation of the Tesio, Ash Split, and Opti-flow hemodialysis catheters.J Vasc Interv Radiol2001; 12: 431–5.
5.
JeanG., CharraB., ChazotC., VanelT., TerratJ-C, HurotJ-M. Long-term outcome of permanent hemodialysis catheters: a controlled study.Blood Purif2001; 19: 401–7.
6.
MankusR.A., AshS.R., SuttonJ.M.. Comparison of blood flow rates and hydraulic resistance between the Mahurkar catheter, the Tesio twin catheter, and the Ash Split catheter.ASAIO J1998; 44: M532–4.
7.
MosqueraD.A., GibsonS.P., GoldmanM.D.. Vascular access surgery: a 2-year study and comparison with the Permcath.Nephrol Dial Transplant1992; 7: 1111–5.
TesioF., De BazH., PanarelloG.Double catheterization of the internal jugular vein for hemodialysis: indications, techniques, and clinical results.Artif Organs1994; 18: 301–4.
10.
TrerotolaS.O., KrausM., ShahH.Randomized comparison of split tip versus step tip high-flow hemodialysis catheters.Kidney Int2002; 62: 282–9.
11.
TrerotolaS.O., ShahH., JohnsonM.Randomized comparison of high flow versus conventional hemodialysis catheters.J Vasc Interv Radiol1999; 10: 1032–8.
