Transparent polyurethane film is recommended for catheter site insertion dressing by the American guidelines for the prevention of infections associated with intravascular catheters. It has been proven to offer the advantages of excellent adhesion, firm support of the catheter, good tolerability, ease of application and fewer replacements per catheter lifetime. The last two features save nursing time and result in healthcare cost savings.
O'GradyN.P., AlexanderM., DellingerE.P.Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.MMWR Recomm Rep.2002; 51(RR-10): 1–29.
2.
HoffmannK.K., WeberD.J., SamsaG.P., RutalaW.A.Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks.JAMA1992; 267: 2072–6.
3.
BerryD.A.Transparent polyurethane film as a catheter dressing.JAMA1992; 268: 2514–5.
AlyR., BaylesC., MaibachH.Restriction of bacterial growth under commercial catheter dressings.Am J Infection Control1988; 16: 95–100.
6.
MakiD.G., RingerM.Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous cathetersJAMA1987; 258: 2396–403.
7.
MakiD.G., StolzS.S., WheelerS., MermelL.A.A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.Crit Care Med1994; 22: 1729–37.
8.
MakiD.G., MermelL.A.Meta-analysis of transparent vs gauze dressings for central venous catheter use [Abstract]Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1997; 18(suppl 2): S51.
9.
MermelL.A.Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.Ann Intern Med2000; 132: 391–402.
10.
GilliesD., O'RiordanL., CarrD., FrostJ., GunniingR., O'BrienI.Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003; 4: CD003827.
11.
RaseroL., Degl'InnocentiM., MocaliM., for the Italian Nurse Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO). Comparison of two different time interval protocols for central venous catheter dressing in bone marrow transplant patients: results of a randomized, multicenter study.Haematologica2000; 85: 275–9.
12.
AlyR., BaylesC., BiebelD.Investigation of bacterial growth and moisture handling properties of transparent dressings. Data on file, 3M Health Care, St. Paul, USA, pdf Document, Clinical Studies Brochure, http://multimedia.mmm.com.
13.
Treston-AurandJ., OlmstedR.N., Allen-BridsonK., CraigC.P.Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates.J Intravenous Nursing1997; 20: 201–6.
14.
RubioP.A.Physiology, immunology and clinical efficacy of an adherent polyurethane wound dressing: OpSite™. In: WiseD.L. ed. Burn Wound Coverings.CRC Press1984; Vol II pages 253–4.
15.
RubioP.A.Use of semiocclusive, transparent film dressings for surgical wound protection: experience in 3637 cases.Int Surg1991; 76: 253–4.
16.
ReynoldsM.G., TebbsS.E., ElliottT.S.J.Do dressings with increased permeability reduce the incidence of central venous catheter related sepsis?Int Crit Care Nursing1997; 13: 26–9.
17.
MadeoM., MartinC.R., TurnerC., KirkbyV., ThompsonD.R.A randomized trial comparing Arglaes (a transparent dressing containing silver ions) to Tegaderm (a transparent polyurethane dressing) for dressing peripheral arterial catheters and central vascular catheters.Int Crit Care Nursing1998; 14: 187–91.
18.
CallaghanS., CopnellB., JohnstonL.Comparison of two methods of peripheral intravenous cannula securement in the pediatric setting.J Infusion Nursing2002; 25: 256–64.
19.
GobbiP.Valutazione di due medicazioni pronte, come alternativa a garza e cerotto nella gestione della terapia endovenosa periferica.Tecnica Ospedaliera2001; 10: 1–8.
20.
Le CorreI., DelormeM., CournoyerS.A prospective, randomized trial comparing a transparent dressing and a dry gauze on the exit site of long term central venous catheters of hemodialysis patients.The Journal of Vascular Access2003; 4: 56–61.
