In order to acquire an overview of the effectiveness of antimicrobially impregnated catheters on the prevention of catheter related bloodstream infections (CRI), we conducted a systematic review concentrating on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The analysis end point was CRI; therefore, studies focussing only on catheter colonization were excluded. We did not consider abstracts for analysis. We identified 24 RCTs investigating the effectiveness of antimicrobially impregnated catheters. In addition, we discovered five meta-analyses and four studies investigating cost effectiveness. For the majority of antimicrobially impregnated catheter types only a few studies were available, and not enough to draw conclusions. Therefore, despite a relatively large number of RCTs available, the routine use of antimicrobially impregnated catheters as a measure for CRI prevention remains controversial, with a need for more high quality studies.
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992 to June 2002, issued August 2002.Am J Infect Control2002; 30: 458–75.
2.
GastmeierP., SohrD., GeffersC., NassauerA., DaschnerF., RüdenH.Are nosocomial infection rates in intensive care units useful benchmark parameter?Infection2000; 28: 346–50.
3.
RijndersB., Van WijngaerdenE., PeetermansW.Catheter-tip colonization as a surrogate end point in clinical studies on catheter-related blodstream infection: How strong is the evidence?Clin Infect Dis2002; 35: 1053–8.
4.
MarikP., AbrahamG., CareauP., VaronJ., FrommR.The ex vivo antimicrobial activity and colonization rate of two antimicrobial-bonded central venous catheters.Crit Care Med1999; 27: 1128–31.
5.
DarouicheR.O., RaadI.I., HeartS.O., for the Catheter Study Group. The Catheter Study Group. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters.N Engl J Med1999; 340: 1–8.
6.
VeenstraD., SaintS., SahaS., LumleyT., SullivanS.Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection.JAMA1999; 281: 261–7.
7.
MarinM., LeeJ., SkkurnickJ.Prevention of nosocomial bloodstream infections: effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and heparin-bonded central venous catheters.Crit Care Med2000; 28: 3332–38.
8.
MermelL.Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.Ann Intern Med2000; 132: 391–402.
9.
WalderB., PittetD., TramèrM.Prevention of bloodstream infections with central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents depends on catheter type and insertion time: Evidence from a meta-analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2002; 23: 748–56.
10.
GeffersC., ZuschneidI., EckmannsT., RüdenH., GastmeierP.The relationship between methodological trial quality and the effects of impregnated central venous catheters.Intensive Care Med2003; 29: 403–9.
11.
MossH., T. SE, FaroquiM., HerbstT., IsaacJ., BrownJ., ElliotT.A central venous catheter coated with benzalkonium chloride for the prevention of catheter-related microbial colonization.Eur J Anaesthesiol2000; 17: 680–7.
12.
StephensR., MythenM., KallisP., DaviesD., EgnerW., RickardsA.Two episodes of life-threatening anaphylaxis in the same patient to a chlorhexidine-sulpha-diazine-coated central venous catheter.Br J Anaesth2001; 87: 306–8.
13.
GoldschmidtH., HahnU., SalwenderH-J. Prevention of catheter-related infections by silver coated central venous catheters in oncological patients.Zbl Bakt1995; 283: 215–23.
14.
BachA., EberhardtH., FrickA., SchmidtH., BöttigerB., MartinE.Efficacy of silver-coating central venous catheters in reducing bacterial colonization.Crit Care Med1999; 27: 515–21.
15.
BöswaldS.S L., RegenfußG., BraunG.Reduktion Katheter-assoziierter Infektionen durch Verwendung eines neuartigen silberimprägnierten zentralvenösen Katheters.Infection1998; 26(Suppl 1): S61–6.
16.
StoiserB., KoflerJ., StaudingerT.Contamination of central venous catheters in immunocompromised patients: a comparison between two different types of central venous catheters.J Hosp Infect2002; 50: 202–6.
17.
RanucciM., GiomarelliP., PavesiM.Impact of oligon central venous catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection.Crit Car Med2003; 31: 52–9.
18.
JaegerK., OsthausA., HeineJ.Efficacy of a benzalkonium chloride-impregnated central venous catheter to prevent catheter-associated infection in cancer patients.Chemotherapy2001; 47: 50–5.
19.
SherertzR., HeardS., RaadI.Gamma-radiationsterilzed, triple-lumen catheters coated with a low cenocentration of chlorhexidine were not efficacious at preventing catheter infections in intensive care unit patients.Antimicrobial Agents Chemother1996; 40: 1995–7.
20.
RaadI., DarrouicheR., DupuisJ., for the Texas Center Catheter Study Group. Central venous catheters with minocycline and rifampicin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. A randomized, double-blind trial.Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 267–74.
21.
SampathL., TambeS., ModakS.In vitro and in vivo efficacy of catheters impregnated with antiseptics or antibiotics: evaluation of the risk of bacterial resistance to the antimicrobials in the catheters.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2001; 22: 640–6.
22.
BachA., SchmidtH., BottigerB.Retention of antibacterial activity and bacterial colonization of antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters.J Antimicrob Chemother1996; 37: 315–22.
23.
CiresiD., AlbrechtR., VolkersP., ScholtenD.Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis.Am Surg1996; 62: 641–6.
24.
PembertonL., RossV., CuddyP., KremerH., FesslerT., McGurkE.No difference in catheter sepsis between standard and antiseptic central venous catheters.Arch Surg1996; 131: 986–9.
25.
GeorgeS., VuddamalayP., BoscoeM.Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization and associated infection in immunocompromised transplant patients.Eur J Anaesthesiol1997; 14: 428–31.
26.
LoggheC., Van OsselC., D'HooreW., EzzedineH., WautersG., HaxheJ.J.Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infection in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial.J Hosp Infect1997; 37: 145–56.
27.
MakiD.G., StolzS.M., WheelerS., MermelL.A.Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial.Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 257–66.
28.
TennenbergS., LieserM., McCurdyB.A prospective randomized trial of an antibiotic-and antiseptic-coated central venous catheter in the prevention of catheter-related infections.Arch Surg1997; 132: 1348–51.
29.
CollinG.Decreasing catheter-colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter.Chest1999; 115: 1632–40.
30.
HeardS., WagleM., VijayakumarE.Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silversulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia.Arch Intern Med1998; 158: 81–7.
31.
HannanM., JusteR., UmasankerS.Antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters and bacterial colonisation.Anaesthesia1999; 54: 868–72.
32.
ShengW-H, KoW-J, WangJ-T, ChangS-C, HsuehP.R., LuhK-T. Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis2000; 38: 1–5.
33.
TheakerC., JusteR., LucasN., TallboysC., AzadianB., SoniN.Comparison of bacterial colonisation rates of antiseptic impregnated and pure polymer central venous catheters in the critical ill.J Hosp Infect2002; 52: 310–2.
VeenstraD., SaintS., SullivanS.Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection.JAMA1999; 282: 554–60.
36.
FrankU., ChojnackiT., DettenkoferM., DaschnerF.Cost-effectiveness of an antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheter in the ICU.Intens Care Med2003; 29: 139.
37.
MarcianteK., VeenstraD., LipskyB., SaintS.Which antimicrobial impregnated central venous catheter should we use? Modeling the costs and outcomes of antimicrobial catheter use.Am J Infect Control2003; 31: 1–8.
38.
EllisM., RhydderchD., ZwaanF., GuyM., BaillieF.High incidence of line-related infection and mechanical failure of an antiseptic impregnated central venous catheter in highly immunocompromised patients.Scand J Infect Dis1996; 28: 91–3.
39.
OdaT., HamasakiJ., KandaN., MikamiK.Anaphilactic shock induced by an antiseptic-coated central venous catheter.Anesthesiology1997; 87: 1242–4.
40.
TerazawaE., ShimonakaH., NagaaseK., MassueT., DohiS.Severe anaphylactic reaction due to a chlorhexidine-impregnated central venous catheter.Anesthesiology1998; 89: 1296–8.
