35 cases of arthroplasty revision are reviewed with mean follow-up time of 56 m. (range 24 to 107), by clinical and radiographic study. The results were satisfactory, having only one case of secondary failure (2.8%), also in comparison with other studies. The reason of this probably lies in the adaptability of our technique: in fact we use without preconcepts both cement and cementless fixations with many types of stems and cotyles; this allows us to obtain a stable fixation also taking in consideration the bone characteristics of each case.
AmstutzH.C., JinnahR.H., MaiL.Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop1982; 170: 21–33.
2.
CallaghanJ.J., SalvatiE.A., PellicciP.M., WilsonP.D., RanawatC.S.Results for revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1970 to 1982. J Bone Joint surg1985; 67-A: 1074–85.
3.
CharnleyJ., CupicZ.The nine and ten years results of the low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop, 1973; 95: 9–25.
4.
CookS.D., Mc CluskeyL.C., MartinP.C., HaddadR.J.Inflammatory response in retrieved non-cemented porous-coated implants. Clin Orhop, 1991; 264: 209–22.
5.
D'AubignéR.M., PostelM.Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg1954; 36-A: 451.
6.
EnghC.A., BobynJ.D., GlassmanA.H.Five years results of porous coated hip replacement with the AML prosthesis. Orthop Rei Sci1990; 1: 42–51.
7.
EskolaA., SantavirtaS., KonttinenY.T., HoikkaV., Tall-rothK., LindholmT.S.Cementless revision of aggressive granulomatous lesions in hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg1990; 72-B: 212–6.
8.
GruenT.A., McNeiceG.M., AmsutzH.C.Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop1979; 141: 17–27.
9.
HunterG.A., WelshR.P., CameronH.U., BaileyW.H.The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg1979; 61-b(4): 419–21.
10.
KavanaghB.F., IlstrupD.M., FitzgeraldR.H.Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg1985; 67-a: 517–26.
11.
KershawC.J., AtkinsR.M., DoddC.A.F., BulstrodeC.J.K.Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure. J Bone Joint Surg1991; 73-b(4): 564–8.
12.
MartiR.K., SchullerH.M., BesselaarP.P., HaasnootE.L.V.Results of revision of hip arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg1990; 73-a(3): 346–54.
13.
OhlinA., JohnellO., LernerU.H.The pathogenesis of loosening of total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop1990; 253: 287–96.
14.
PellicciP.M., WilsonP.D., SledgeC.B., SalvatiE.A., RanawatC.S., PossR., CallaghanJ.J.Longterm results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg1982; 67-a: 513–6.
15.
SuraceA., MineoG., BarberisF.Hip Prostheses reimplantation with cement and cementless. Free papers printed in full of XXVI World Congress of the International College of Surgeons, Milan, Italy, July 1988; 3–9.
16.
SuraceA., MineoG., MicaleC., De GiovanniG., Pre-viteraA.M.Longterm evaluation of hip arthroplasty. Hip International1991; 1: 102–7.
17.
SuraceA., PietrograndeL., MineoG.Mid-thigh pain in cementless arthroplasty, pathogenetic hypoteses. Hip International1991; 1, 4: 196–203.
18.
WittJ.D., SwannM.Metal wear and tissue response in failed titanium alloy total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg1991; 73-b, 559–63.
