Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

The shuck test is a subjective method used intraoperatively to measure soft tissue tension during total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to introduce and quantify the shuck length vector magnitude in patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted THA, and identify factors affecting its value.

Methods:

This prospective cohort study analysed 95 primary THAs performed on 87 patients. Surgical data and intraoperative soft tissue tension measurements were recorded using the Mako robotic arm-assisted system. An exploratory analysis of factors affecting the shuck length vector magnitude was performed.

Results:

The mean shuck length vector magnitude was 8.7 mm. Shuck length vector magnitude was significantly higher in males as compared to females (p = 0.017). A strong inverse correlation was found between increased hip offset and hip length on shuck length vector magnitude (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Shuck length vector magnitude was not affected by femoral head size (p = 0.674) and arthritis severity (p = 0.141).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates that it is possible to quantify soft tissue tension using the shuck test during robotic-assisted THA. Restoring hip offset is crucial for optimising joint stability. Future research should establish a threshold for acceptable shuck length vector magnitude and correlate this with dislocation rates and patient reported outcomes.

Keywords

Hip stability robotic surgery shuck test soft tissue balance total hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kurtz

Ong

Lau

, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 780–785.

Ackerman

Bohensky

Zomer

, et al. The projected burden of primary total knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis in Australia to the year 2030. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20: 90.

Learmonth

Young

Rorabeck

The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 2007; 370: 1508–1519.

Dimitriou

Antoniadis

Flury

, et al. Total hip arthroplasty improves the quality-adjusted life years in patients who exceeded the estimated life expectancy. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 3484–3489.

Neuprez

Kaux

, et al. Total joint replacement improves pain, functional quality of life, and health utilities in patients with late-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis for up to 5 years. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39: 861–871.

Daigle

Weinstein

Katz

, et al. The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review of published literature. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012; 26: 649–658.

Ogawa

Takao

Hamada

, et al. Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2018; 42: 2059–2065.

Loughenbury

McWilliams

Stewart

, et al. Hip surgeons and leg length inequality after primary hip replacement. Hip Int 2018; 29: 102–108.

Charles

Bourne

Davey

, et al. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1078–1088.

10.

Wei

JCJ

Blaauw

Van Der Pol

DGM

, et al. Design of an Affordable, modular implant device for soft tissue tension assessment and range of motion tracking during total hip arthroplasty. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2022; 10: 2500310.

11.

Fontalis

Kayani

Thompson

, et al. Robotic total hip arthroplasty: past, present and future. Orthopaedics and Trauma 2022; 36: 6–13.

12.

Gaston

Simpson

, et al. Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B: 1009–1020.

13.

Bendich

Vigdorchik

Sharma

, et al. Robotic assistance for posterior approach total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower risk of revision for dislocation when compared to manual techniques. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37: 1124–1129.

14.

Shibanuma

Ishida

Matsumoto

, et al. Early postoperative clinical recovery of robotic arm-assisted vs. image-based navigated total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22: 314.

15.

Tönnis

Heinecke

Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1747–1770.

16.

Enke

Levy

Bruce

WJ.

Accuracy of leg length and femoral offset restoration after total hip arthroplasty with the utilisation of an intraoperative calibration gauge. Hip Int 2020; 30: 296–302.

17.

Desai

Connors

Board

TN.

Functional and radiological evaluation of a simple intra operative technique to avoid limb length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2011; 21: 192–198.

18.

Higa

Tanino

Ito

, et al. Soft-tissue tension during total hip arthroplasty measured in four patients and predicted using a musculoskeletal model. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10: 130.

19.

Smith

Gill

McAuliffe

, et al. Hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty: 2023 annual report, Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry, AOA, Adelaide, South Australia. 2023.

A quantitative analysis of the hip shuck test during robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty