Abstract
Background:
10 years after changing our institution’s total hip arthroplasty (THA) preoperative antibiotic prophylactic protocol by adding gram-negative (GN) coverage, this study aimed to assess the impact of adding GN specific coverage (GNSC) prior to THA on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates.
Methods:
This was a retrospective case-control study of 14,598 patients who underwent primary, elective THA between July 2012 and January 2022, with minimum 1-year follow-up. All patients were under perioperative antibiotic protocol that included GNSC with either weight-based gentamicin or aztreonam (+GNSC) and were compared to a historical control group of patients for which the antibiotic prophylactic protocol did not include GNSC (-GNSC). PJI and nephrotoxicity rates, as well as the severity of nephrotoxicity according to the RIFLE criteria, were compared between the study populations and 4122 controls.
Results:
Proportions of GN-related PJIs among culture-positive (13.70 vs. 26.53%, p = 0.076) and all PJIs (10.64 vs. 26.53%, p = 0.014) were lower for +GNSC patients, while the proportion of PJIs caused by a gram-positive bacteria were similar between groups (87.67 vs. 83.67%, p = 0.532). While the +GNSC group have significantly higher rates of nephrotoxicity (2.87 vs. 1.78%, p = 0.003), the rates of kidney injury (0.39 vs. 0.39%, p = 0.998) and kidney failure (0.17 vs. 0.16%, p = 0.567), which are the two more severe forms of nephrotoxicity, were comparable between the groups.
Conclusions:
The addition of gentamicin or aztreonam prior to THA reduces the incidence of GN-related PJIs. Increased nephrotoxicity rates were limited to the mildest form, usually associated with reversibility and favourable outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
