Abstract
Introduction:
The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of periprosthetic fractures occurring as a result of a sideways fall in total hip arthroplasty patients, and to compare the predictions of numerical models in terms of load distribution on the implanted femur with clinical data.
Materials and methods:
3 numerical models were built: 1 for intact femur and 2 for implanted femur with a straight stem (resembling PBF, Permedica) and with an anatomical stem (resembling ABG II, Stryker). 4 loading configurations were simulated; 1 simulates a vertical load, and 3 simulate a fall with impact on the greater trochanter in different directions. Stress state calculated in the implanted femur was compared for the 2 models with reference to the intact case. These were compared with clinical data collected at a single centre (Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy) where 41 patients were investigated after periprosthetic fracture: 26 patients had a straight uncemented stem and 15 an anatomical uncemented stem.
Results:
The maximum calculated strain in compression in the case of ABG II implanted femur was 2 times higher than in the presence of PBF stem in the vertical loading configuration. For configurations of sideways fall, in both models, there was a progressive increase of stress state in the bone with increasing angle. Simulations of sideways fall elicited results in accordance with clinical observations: due to the peculiar stem design and consequent state of stress in the bone, anatomical stems seem to induce trochanteric fractures more frequently, while for straight stems type B fractures are more likely to occur.
Conclusions:
Clinical findings confirmed numerical model predictions: stem design seems to highly influence distribution of stress in the bone and consequent localisation of the fracture site.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.