LinYLiTDengX, et al. Repaired or unrepaired capsulotomy after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Hip Int2020; 30(3): 256–266.
2.
KunzeKNNwachukwuBUChahlaJ, et al. Case (and capsule) closed! Can we really claim that capsular repair may not influence outcomes after hip arthroscopy?Hip Int2020.
3.
BoliaIBriggsKKPhilipponMJ.Superior clinical outcomes with capsular closure versus non-closure in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair. Orthop J Sports Med2018; 6(Suppl. 3): 2325967118S00009.
4.
SugarmanEPBirnsMEFishmanM, et al. Clinical outcomes comparing capsular repair vs. no repair following hip arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized control study. Orthop J Sports Med2017; 5(Suppl. 6): 2325967117S00415.
5.
Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviewsWashington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.
6.
HopewellSMcDonaldSClarkeM, et al. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007; 2: MR000010.
7.
BenziesKMPremjiSHaydenKA, et al. State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs2006; 3: 55–61.
8.
BoliaIKFagottiLBriggsKK, et al. Midterm outcomes following repair of capsulotomy versus nonrepair in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with labral repair. Arthroscopy2019; 35: 1828–1834.
9.
DombBGChaharbakhshiEOPeretsI, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of capsular repair versus capsulotomy in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: minimum 5-year follow-up-a matched comparison study. Arthroscopy2018; 35: 853–863.e1.
10.
DombBGStakeCEFinleyZJ, et al. Influence of capsular repair versus unrepaired capsulotomy on 2-year clinical outcomes after arthroscopic hip preservation surgery. Arthroscopy2015; 31: 643–650.
