Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most successful orthopaedic procedures, it is not without complications. As such, finding the optimal surgical approach has become an area of particular interest. In this study, we compare: (1) pain intensity; (2) opioid consumption; (3) lengths of stay (LOS); (4) complication rates; (5) discharge destination; and (6) ambulatory function between patients who underwent THA via the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral (MS-ALA) and conventional direct lateral (DLA) approaches.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 220 consecutive patients who received primary THA using the supine MS-ALA (n = 101) or DLA (n = 119) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, LOS, discharge destination, complications, additional procedures, and time to independent ambulation.

Results:

We demonstrated significantly lower opioid consumption on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 (mean differences, −32.0 and −28.4 mg, respectively; p ⩽ 0.001) and decreased pain intensity during the second 24 hours of the hospital stay (mean difference, –22.0; p < 0.001) in patients receiving the MS-ALA. Relative to the DLA cohort, patients in the MS-ALA cohort were 2.04 times more likely to be discharged to home (p = 0.028) and 1.91 times less likely to experience postoperative abductor insufficiency (p = 0.039).

Conclusion:

The present study is the 1st to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly pain intensity and opioid consumption, between the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral and direct lateral THA approaches. Further research should investigate the effect of surgical approach on quality and cost of care, include larger sample sizes, and involve longer-term follow-up.

Keywords

Anterolateral approach direct lateral approach muscle-sparing THA total hip arthroplasty Watson-Jones

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chechik

Khashan

Lador

, et al. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 1595–1600.

Kwon

Kuskowski

Mulhall

, et al. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 447: 34–38.

Phillips

Barrett

Losina

, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 20–26.

Masonis

Bourne

RB.

Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 405: 46–53.

Lachiewicz

PF.

Abductor tendon tears of the hip: evaluation and management. Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19: 385–391.

Valente

Taddei

Jonkers

Influence of weak hip abductor muscles on joint contact forces during normal walking: probabilistic modeling analysis. J Biomech 2013; 46: 2186–2193.

Oinuma

Eingartner

Saito

, et al. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 310–326.

Goebel

Steinert

Schillinger

, et al. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 491–498.

Alecci

Valente

Crucil

, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol 2011; 12: 123–129.

10.

Christensen

Karthikeyan

Jacobs

CA.

Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1839–1841.

11.

De Geest

Fennema

Lenaerts

, et al. Adverse effects associated with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135: 1183–1192.

12.

Laffosse

J-M

Chiron

Accadbled

, et al. Learning curve for a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement: analysis of complications and early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach. Acta Orthop Belg 2006; 72: 693–701.

13.

Delanois

Sultan

Albayar

, et al. The Röttinger approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, comparison to the direct lateral approach and review of literature. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5(Suppl. 3): S31–S31.

14.

Mandereau

Brzakala

Matsoukis

Functional recovery, complications and CT positioning of total hip replacement performed through a Röttinger anterolateral mini-incision. Review of a continuous series of 103 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: 8–16.

15.

Röttinger

[Minimally invasive anterolateral approach for total hip replacement (OCM technique)]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2010; 22: 421–430.

16.

Hardinge

The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64: 17–19.

17.

Demos

Rorabeck

Bourne

, et al. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 393: 168–180.

18.

Amlie

Havelin

Furnes

, et al. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 463–469.

19.

Berend

Lombardi

A V

Seng

, et al. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(Suppl. 6): 107–120.

20.

Barrett

Turner

Leopold

JP.

Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1634–1638.

21.

Picado

CHF

Garcia

Marques

Jr.

Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455: 209–211.

22.

Khan

Knowles

Damage to the superior gluteal nerve during the direct lateral approach to the hip. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 1198–1200.

23.

Goulding

Beaulé

Kim

, et al. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 2397–2404.

24.

Mjaaland

Svenningsen

Fenstad

, et al. Implant survival after minimally invasive anterior or anterolateral vs. conventional posterior or direct lateral approach: an analysis of 21,860 total hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 840–847.

Short-term outcomes of the supine muscle-sparing anterolateral versus direct lateral approach to primary total hip arthroplasty