The external obturator footprint as a landmark in total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach: a CT-based analysis

Abstract

Background:

Anatomical landmarks for templating of total hip arthroplasty (THA) that are visible both during surgery and on radiographs are rare. If surgery is performed through a direct anterior approach the external obturator tendon (EO) is consistently visible. To use this point as a reference the exact position and dimensions of the footprint need to be known.

Aim:

To determine the location and dimension of the EO footprint on pelvic radiographs by correlating the EO anatomy in CT scans with conventional radiographs.

Methods:

CT scans and radiographs of 200 patients were analysed. The EO tendon was identified on CT scans; the height of its footprint, and its distance to the tip of the greater trochanter and to the anatomical axis of the femur was measured. The accuracy and inter-rater reliability in the identification of the EO footprint was determined.

Results:

The EO tendon was visible on all CT scans and it’s footprint was identifiable on all corresponding radiographs. It’s cranio-caudal dimension was 6.4 ± 1.4 mm. It’s distance to the tip of the greater trochanter was 16.0 ± 3.1 mm. The EO footprint was located 5.2 ± 3.7 mm lateral to the femoral anatomical axis. There was no significant difference regarding the accuracy of EO footprint localisation on radiographs among the 2 readers.

Conclusion:

The EO footprint on the greater trochanter is consistently visible on CT scans and radiographs. As the variability of the footprint dimension is small, this structure may serve as a useful landmark in THA, particularly when performed through a direct anterior approach.

Keywords

Anatomy direct anterior approach external obturator hip arthroplasty landmark leg length templating radiology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sykes

Hill

Orr

et al . Patients’ perception of leg length discrepancy post total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2015; 25: 452–456.

Mahmood

Mukka

Crnalic

et al . The influence of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty on function and quality of life: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 1638–1642.

Eggli

Pisan

Muller

. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 382–390.

Müller

. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 274: 12–21.

Knight

Atwater

. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7(Suppl): 403–409.

Hassani

Cherix

et al . Comparisons of preoperative three-dimensional planning and surgical reconstruction in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1273–1277.

Sariali

Mauprivez

Khiami

et al . Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: 151–158.

Gomez-Hoyos

Schroder

Reddy

et al . Is there a relationship between psoas impingement and increased trochanteric retroversion? J Hip Preserv Surg 2015; 2: 164–169.

Ito

Matsushita

Watanabe

et al . Anatomic mapping of short external rotators shows the limit of their preservation during total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1690–1695.

10.

Leunig

Faas

von Knoch

et al . Skin crease ‘bikini’ incision for anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 2245–2252.

11.

Lakhwani

Mittal

Naik

. Piriformis fossa–an anatomical and orthopedics consideration. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 96–97.

12.

Tamaki

Nimura

Oinuma

et al . An anatomic study of the impressions on the greater trochanter: bony geometry indicates the alignment of the short external rotator muscles. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 2473–2477.