Anterior centre-edge angle on sagittal CT: a comparison of normal hips to dysplastic hips

Abstract

Purpose:

The anterior centre-edge angle (ACEA) describes anterior acetabular coverage on false profile radiographs. Variability associated with pelvic tilt, radiographic projection, and identifying the true anterior edge, causes discrepancies in measuring an accurate ACEA. Computed tomography (CT) has the potential of improving the accuracy of ACEA. However, because the ACEA on sagittal CT has been shown to not be equivalent to ACEA on false profile radiographs, the normal range of ACEA on CT currently remains unknown and cannot reliably be used to determine over/under coverage. We therefore asked: what is the normal variation of ACEA corrected for pelvic tilt on sagittal CT and how does this compare to dysplastic hips?

Material and Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted on patients 10–35 who underwent CT for non-orthopedic related issues and patients with known hip dysplasia. The ACEA was measured on a sagittal slice corresponding to the centre of the femoral head on the axial slice and adjusted for pelvic tilt. A statistical comparison was then performed.

Results:

A total of 320 normal patients and 22 patients with hip dysplasia were reviewed. The mean ACEA for all ages was 50° ± 8°, (range: 23–81º), with a larger mean ACEA for males (51°) than females (49°). The ACEA mean for dysplastic hips was 30° ± 11° with a statistically significant difference in mean from the normal hip group (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

The ACEA can be reliably measured on sagittal CT and significantly differs from dysplastic hips. ACEA measurements above 66° or below 34° may represent anterior over and under coverage.

Keywords

Anterior centre edge angle anterior hip coverage hip preservation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lequesne

False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1961; 28: 643–652.

Siebenrock

Schoeniger

Ganz

Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 278–286.

Ganz

Klaue

Vinh

et al . A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. 1988. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 418: 3–8.

Crockarell

Jr Trousdale

Guyton

JL.

The anterior centre-edge angle. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 532–534.

Clohisy

Carlisle

Beaule

et al . A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(Suppl. 4): 47–66.

Anderson

Gililland

Pelt

et al . Center edge angle measurement for hip preservation surgery: technique and caveats. Orthopedics 2011; 34: 86.

Novais

Duncan

Nepple

et al . Do radiographic parameters of dysplasia improve to normal ranges after bernese periacetabular osteotomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 1120–1127.

Wiberg

Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 1939; 58(Suppl.): 7–38.

Kling

Karns

Gebhart

et al . The effect of acetabular rim recession on anterior acetabular coverage: a cadaveric study using the false-profile radiograph. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 957–964.

10.

Wassilew

Heller

Diederichs

et al . Standardized AP radiographs do not provide reliable diagnostic measures for the assessment of acetabular retroversion. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 1369–1376.

11.

Dandachli

Islam

Liu

et al . Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 1031–1036.

12.

Clohisy

Carlisle

Trousdale

et al . Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 666–675.

13.

Dolan

Heyworth

Bedi

et al . CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 831–838.

14.

Heyworth

Dolan

Nguyen

et al . Preoperative three-dimensional CT predicts intraoperative findings in hip arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1950–1957.

15.

Notzli

Wyss

Stoecklin

et al . The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 556–560.

16.

Milcan

Yildiz

Oztuna

et al . The anterior center edge angle: a study of 102 volunteers. Joint Bone Spine 2004; 71: 221–223.

17.

Monazzam

Bomar

Cidambi

et al . Lateral center-edge angle on conventional radiography and computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 2233–2237.

18.

Stelzeneder

Hingsammer

Bixby

et al . Can radiographic morphometric parameters for the hip be assessed on MRI? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 989–999.

19.

Zingg

Werner

Sukthankar

et al . The anterior center edge angle in Lequesne’s false profile view: interrater correlation, dependence on pelvic tilt and correlation to anterior acetabular coverage in the sagital plane. A cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 787–791.

20.

Needell

Borzykowski

Carreira

et al . CT false-profile view of the hip: a reproducible method of measuring anterior acetabular coverage using volume CT data. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43: 1605–1611.

21.

Larson

Moreau-Gaudry

Kelly

et al . Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 1247–1254.

22.

Monazzam

Bomar

Dwek

et al . Development and prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement-associated morphology in a paediatric and adolescent population: a CT study of 225 patients. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 598–604.

23.

Murphy

Kijewski

Millis

et al . Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (261): 214–223.

24.

Sakai

Nishii

Sugamoto

et al . Is vertical-center-anterior angle equivalent to anterior coverage of the hip? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 2865–2871.

25.

Hanson

Kapron

Swenson

et al . Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles. J Hip Preserv Surg 2015; 2: 280–286.