Gait analysis following release of the short external rotators during an anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Background:

Cadaveric and clinical studies suggest surgical release of the short external rotators is sometimes necessary to improve exposure during total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an anterior approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of those surgical releases on gait following THA.

Methods:

15 patients undergoing THA using an anterior approach, anterior approach with surgical releases, or posterior approach underwent 3-D gait analysis preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. At each time point, temporal parameters, kinematics, and kinetics were compared. The anterior approach was compared to the anterior approach cohort with surgical releases, and the surgical release cohort was compared to a posterior approach cohort. The mean change score between preoperative and 6 weeks, and 6-week to 12-week analyses were analysed.

Results:

There were no demographic differences between the groups. There were no significant differences between the groups for the temporal parameters and kinematic analyses at either time point comparison. The surgical release cohort had a lower hip internal rotation moment compared to the anterior approach cohort for the 6- to 12-week comparison (p = 0.05), and compared to the posterior approach cohort for the preoperative to 6-week (p = 0.03) and 6- to 12-week comparison (p = 0.02).

Conclusion:

Releasing the short external rotators during an anterior approach did not cause significant temporal and kinematic changes after THA. However, small changes in hip internal rotation moments can be expected. These findings should be correlated with patient-reported outcome measures to determine if these gait anomalies predict poor outcome following THA.

Keywords

Anterior approach conjoined tendon gait hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dosanjh

Matta

Bhandari

; Anterior THA Research Collaborative. The final straw: a qualitative study to explore patient decisions to undergo total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 719–727.

Meneghini

Pagnano

Trousdale

et al . Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 293–298.

Frye

Berend

Lombardi

Jr et al . Do sex and BMI predict or does stem design prevent muscle damage in anterior supine minimally invasive THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 632–638.

Petis

Howard

Lanting

et al . Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg 2015; 58: 128–139.

Rathod

Orishimo

Kremenic

et al . Similar improvement in gait parameters following direct anterior & posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1261–1264.

Foucher

. Preoperative gait mechanics predict clinical response to total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2017; 35: 366–376.

Flack

Nicholson

Woodley

SJ.

The anatomy of the hip abductor muscles. Clin Anat 2014; 27: 241–253.

Bottner

Pellicci

PM.

Review: posterior soft tissue repair in primary total hip arthroplasty. HSS J 2006; 2: 7–11.

Bowsher

Vaughan

CL.

Effect of foot-progression angle on hip joint moments during gait. J Biomech 1995; 28: 759–762.

10.

Queen

Butler

Watters

et al . The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on postoperative gait mechanics. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(6 Suppl.): 66–71.

11.

Meneghini

Smits

Swinford

et al . A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(6 Suppl. 1): 68–73.

12.

Pospischill

Kranzl

Attwenger

et al . Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 328–337.

13.

Barbieri

dos Santos

Simieli

et al . Interactions of age and leg muscle fatigue on unobstructed walking and obstacle crossing. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 985–990.

14.

Kang

Dingwell

JB.

Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. Gait Posture 2008; 27: 572–577.

15.

Constantinou

Barrett

Brown

et al . Spatial-temporal gait characteristics in individuals with hip osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 291-B7.

16.

Beauchet

Allali

Annweiler

et al . Gait variability among healthy adults: low and high stride-to-stride variability are both a reflection of gait stability. Gerontology 2009; 55: 702–706.

17.

Ihlen

Sletvold

Goihl

et al . Older adults have unstable gait kinematics during weight transfer. J Biomech 2012; 45: 1559–1565.

18.

Vickers

Altman

DG.

Statistics notes: analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 2001; 323: 1123–1124.

19.

Varin

Lamontagne

Beaulé

PE.

Does the anterior approach for THA provide closer-to-normal lower-limb motion?

J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1401–1407.

20.

Renkawitz

Weber

Dullien

et al . Leg length and offset differences above 5mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics. Gait Posture 2016; 49: 196–201.