Rehabilitation and patient satisfaction following a modified anterolateral approach for implantation of a total hip replacement (THR) were reviewed following 72 consecutive cases.
The Harris Hip and merle d'Aubigné Scores were recorded at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. The patient's satisfaction with regard to the surgical result and the need for analgesia for mobilization were recorded. Rehabilitation was assessed by postoperative crutch use.
Significant improvements of the Harris Hip and merle d'Aubigné scores were demonstrated. All patients thought their surgical outcome was good or better. 2 patients needed pain medicine on an irregular basis and 4 patients used crutches at 12 weeks.
This study demonstrates patient satisfaction and satisfactory rehabilitation following a modified anterolateral approach for minimally-invasive implantation of THR.
EnghC.A.Jr., ClausA.M., HopperR.H.Jr., EnghC.A.. Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis.Clin Orthop2001; 393: 137–46.
2.
SieboldR., SchellerG., SchreinerU., JaniL.. Long-term results with the cement-free Spotorno CLS shaft.Orthopade2001; 30: 317–22.
3.
MalloryT.H., LombardiA.V.Jr., LeithJ.R.. Minimal 10-year results of a tapered cementless femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2001; 16: 49–54.
4.
RöttingerH.. The MIS anterolateral approach for THA.Orthopäde2006; 35: 708, 710–15.
5.
RothA., VenbrocksR.A.. Total hip replacement through a minimally invasive, anterolateral approach with the patient supine.Oper Orthop Traumatol2007; 19: 442–57.
6.
DorrL.D., MaheshwariA.V., LongW.T., WanZ., Sirianni. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study.J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89: 1153–60.
7.
OinumaK., EingartnerC., SaitoY., ShiratsuchiH.. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach.Oper Orthop Traumatol2007; 19: 310–26.
8.
GrafR., Azizbaig-MohajerM.. Minimally invasive total hip replacement with the patient in the supine position and the contralateral leg elevated.Oper Orthop Traumatol2006; 18: 317–29.
9.
LinD.H., JanM.H., LiuT.K., LinY.F., HouS.M.. Effects of antero-lateral minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty on hip muscle strength, walking speed, and functional score.J Arthroplasty2007; 22: 1187–92.
10.
WaldeT.A., KuttlerW., BlattgersteD., WaldeH.J.. Minimal invasive implantation of total hip arthroplasty using a modified antero-lateral approach. Technique and intraoperative results.Joint German Congress of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery2005. Berlin, 19.10. – 22.10.2005.
11.
HarrisW.H.. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by Mold athroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation.J Bone Jt Surg Am1969; 51: 737–755.
12.
Merle d'AubigneR., PostelM.. Functional results of arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.J Bone Jt Surg Am1954; 36: 451–75.
13.
Watson-JonesR.. Fractures of the neck of the femur.Br J Surg1936; 23: 787–808.
14.
LewinnekG.E., LewisJ.L., TarrR., CompereC.L., ZimmermannJ.R.: Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.J Bone Joint Surg Am1978; 60: 217–20.
15.
WooR.Y., MorreyB.F.. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am1982; 64: 1295–306.
16.
SvenssonO., SkoldS, BlomgrenG.. Integrity of the gluteus medius after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty1990; 5: 57–60.
17.
BakerA.S., BitounisV.C.. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review.J Bone Joint Surg Br1989; 71: 47–50.
18.
AbitbolJ.J., GendronD., LaurinC.A., BeaulieuM.A.. Gluteal nerve damage following total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis.J Arthroplasty1990; 5: 319–22.
19.
RameshM., O'ByrneJ.M., McCarthyN., JarvisA., MahalinghamK., CashmanW.F.. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Br1996; 78: 903–6.
20.
DiGioiaA.M.3rd, PlakseychukA.Y., LevisonT.J., JaramazB.. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.J Arthroplasty2003; 18: 123–8.
21.
GoldsteinW.M., BransonJ.J., BerlandK.A., GordonA.C.. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85-A (suppl 4): 33–8.
22.
KennonR.E., KeggiJ.M., WetmoreR.S., ZatorskiL.E., HuoM.H., KeggiK.J.. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach.J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85-A (suppl 4): 39–48.
23.
ChimentoG.F., PavoneV., SharrockN., KahnB., CahillJ., SculcoT.P.: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.J Arthroplasty2005; 20: 139–44.
24.
BerryD.J., BergerR.A., CallaghanJ.J.. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am2003; 85–A: 2235–46.
25.
WrightJ.M., CrockettH.C., DelgadoS., LymanS., MadesnM., SculcoT.P.. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation.J Arthroplasty2004; 19: 538–45.
26.
BergerR.A.. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach.Clin Orthop2003; 417: 232–41.
27.
BertinK.C., RottingerH.. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004; 429: 248–55.
28.
GibsonA.. Posterior exposure of the hip joint.J Bone Joint Surg Br1950; 32–B: 183–6.
29.
MooreA.T.. The self-locking metal hip prosthesis.J Bone Joint Surg Am1957; 39–A: 811–27.
