Abstract
Background
Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) 0.08% has received the orphan drug designation for management of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK). This review aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PHMB, comparing outcomes across different concentrations (0.08% vs. 0.02%) using a dose-stratified meta-analysis.
Methods
Online databases were searched until February 2025 for studies on PHMB 0.02% or 0.08% as mono- or combination therapy. The primary outcome was clinical cure and secondary outcomes included conjunctival hyperemia and pain. Subgroup analyses were performed based on PHMB concentration. A random-effects model was applied; sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were conducted.
Results
The pooled proportion of cure across 17 studies (923 eyes) was 75.75% (95% CI: 64.56%–84.27%; p < 0.0001; I² = 85.2%). Subgroup analysis showed the highest cure rate with PHMB 0.08% monotherapy (87.04%; 95% CI: 77.54%–92.88%), followed by 0.02% monotherapy (79.27%; 95% CI: 65.29%–88.60%) and mixed 0.02% regimens (72.59%; 95% CI: 54.86%–85.23%). Conjunctival hyperemia was reported in 15.7%, and subgroup analysis by dose revealed highest prevalence in the 0.08% PHMB group (26.4%; 95% CI: 8.4%–49.2%). Pain was reported in 11.9% (n = 225), with no significant increase at higher concentrations. The pooled proportion of overall adverse events was 40.2% (95% CI 26.2%–55.0%; p < 0.0001; I² = 81.4%). Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses, with no publication bias detected.
Conclusion
This dose-stratified meta-analysis found PHMB 0.08% monotherapy to have good efficacy and tolerability, supporting its use as a first-line empirical treatment and underscoring the need for standardized protocols and comparative trials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
