This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of different nasal adrenaline concentrations for bleeding control in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (eDCR).
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed for studies reporting bleeding and cardiovascular events in adult eDCR. Outcomes were analysed using random-effects models. Statistical analyses employed random-effects models and I2 statistic. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EZDWG).
Results
Among 103 screened articles, seven studies (comprising 856 patients) were included for meta-analysis. The 1:200,000 infiltrative adrenaline had significantly higher bleeding risk (15.3%, 95% CI: 11.1–20.5%) than 1:100,000 (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.0–6.5%) and 1:80,000 (2.0%, 95% CI: 0.7–4.3%), with an absolute risk difference of +13.3% (95% CI: + 9.8–16.8%, p < 0.0001) between 1:200,000 and 1:80,000. No significant difference existed between 1:100,000 and 1:80,000 (RD=+1.8%, 95% CI: −1.2–4.7%, p = 0.23). Each 100,000-fold dilution increased absolute bleeding risk by 12.1% (p < 0.001), with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 8 favouring 1:80,000 or 1:100,000 over 1:200,000.
The most common infiltrative concentrations (n = 8,648) were 1:100,000 (57%), 1:200,000 (23%), and 1:80,000 (18%). For topical applications (n = 6,343), 1:1,000 (48%) and 1:100,000 (22%) predominated. While no particular topical concentration showed superior haemostasis (p > 0.05), 30-min 1:1,000 adrenaline application reduced bleeding vs. 5-min use (p < 0.05). Rare complications included ocular and cardiovascular events.
Conclusions
1:100,000 or 1:80,000 infiltrative adrenaline is preferred over 1:200,000 for lower bleeding risks, while topical adrenaline benefits from prolonged 30-min application. Surgeons should remain vigilant for rare systemic complications.
MrittikaSAliMJ. Lacrimal history - part III: doyens of dacryology series - addeo toti and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Semin Ophthalmol2024; 39: 1–2.
2.
HarvinderSRosalindSPhilipR, et al.Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps without stenting. Med J Malaysia2008; 63: 237–238.
3.
AliMJPsaltisAJBassiouniA, et al.Long-term outcomes in primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol2014; 98: 1678–1680.
4.
AliMJPsaltisAJMurphyJ, et al.Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg2015; 31: 219–221.
5.
HowdenJMcCluskeyPO'SullivanG, et al.Assisted local anaesthesia for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol2007; 35: 256–261.
6.
ChoiWCPaikJSDohSH. Results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy under local anesthesia with minimal sedation. J Ophthalmol2017; 2017: 6712491.
7.
PandaNVermaRKPandaNK. Efficacy and safety of high-concentration Adrenaline wicks during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2012; 41: 131–137.
8.
Sarmento JuniorKMTomitaSKosAO. Topical use of Adrenaline in different concentrations for endoscopic sinus surgery. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol2009; 75: 280–289.
9.
LanSYuJQKeF, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with bicanalicular silicone tube intubation for treating chronic dacryocystitis secondary to nasolacrimal duct stent incarceration. Int J Ophthalmol2023; 16: 1218–1223.
10.
WangYLiuFCaoM, et al.Efficacy and safety of modified seamless endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with chronic dacryocystitis. J Ophthalmol2022; 2022: 3061859.
11.
HosalBMHosalSAHurwitzJJ, et al.A rationale for the selection of nasal decongestants in lacrimal drainage surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg1995; 11: 215–220.
12.
TsirbasAWormaldPJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol2003; 135: 76–83.
13.
SmithWMerkonidisCYungM. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients taking aspirin perioperatively. Am J Otolaryngol2006; 27: 323–326.
14.
PittoreBTanNSalisG, et al.Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: results in 64 consecutive procedures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital2010; 30: 294–298.
15.
YeonJYShimWS. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent. Acta Otolaryngol2012; 132: S77–S81.
16.
AliMJPsaltisAJMurphyJ, et al.Outcomes in primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: comparison between experienced versus less experienced surgeons. Am J Rhinol Allergy2014; 28: 514–516.
17.
AliMJPsaltisAJWormaldPJ. Long-term outcomes in revision powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol2014; 4: 1016–1019.
18.
AliMJGangulyAAliMH, et al.Time taken for superior osteotomy in primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is there a difference between an ultrasonic aspirator and a mechanical burr?Int Forum Allergy Rhinol2015; 5: 764–767.
19.
KamalSAliMJPujariA, et al.Primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in the setting of acute dacryocystitis and lacrimal abscess. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg2015; 31: 293–295.
20.
AliMJSinghSNaikMN. Entire lacrimal sac within the ethmoid sinus: outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Ophthalmol2016; 10: 1199–1203.
21.
AliMJSinghMChistyN, et al.Endoscopic ultrasonic dacryocystorhinostomy: clinical profile and outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2016; 273: 1789–1793.
22.
KorkmazHYaoWCKorkmazM, et al.Safety and efficacy of concentrated topical epinephrine use in endoscopic endonasal surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol2015; 5: 1118–1123.
23.
PengWTanBWangY, et al.A modified preserved nasal and lacrimal flap technique in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Sci Rep2017; 7: 6809.
24.
ZlotoOKovalTYakirevichA, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without mucosal flap-is there any difference?Eye (Lond)2020; 34: 1449–1453.
25.
AliMJBothraN. Long-term outcomes of revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy aided by 4-mm coronary balloon catheter dacryoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol2021; 69: 751–754.
26.
RajabiMTShahrakiKNozareA, et al.External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol2022; 29: 1–6.
27.
NitinTUddinSPaulG. Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stents-A comparative study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2022; 74: 1433–1441.
28.
CongTWuYGaoY, et al.Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a clubhead-shaped nasal mucoperiosteal flap technique. Laryngoscope2022; 132: 2314–2318.
29.
MatousekPLubojackyJMasarovaM, et al.Does Bicanalicular Intubation Improve the Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy?J Clin Med2022; 11: 5387.
30.
KhatriMSKharayaA. Clinical trial to compare success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2022; 74: 1266–1273.
31.
Alicandri-CiufelliMRussoPAggazzotti CavazzaE, et al.Endoscopic “retrograde” dacryocystorhinostomy: a fast route to the lacrimal sac. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis2023; 140: 85–88.
32.
ChenRLiuSJiangA, et al.A simple and efficient technique for suturing and knotting during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Int Ophthalmol2023; 43: 63–71.
33.
HanXMJiangWHWuWC, et al.Effect of intubation in patients with functional epiphora after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Int J Ophthalmol2023; 16: 1060–1064.
34.
DuttaMGhatakSBandyopadhyayS. Should silicone lacrimal stenting be a better choice for primary endoscopic powered dacryocystorhinostomy?Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2023; 75: 496–502.
35.
MaldhureSVGolharPSMoonPP. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results with or without stenting. Cureus2023; 15: e33470.
36.
TokatTTokatSKusbeciT. Long-term outcomes of transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and a review of the literature. Niger J Clin Pract2023; 26: 1069–1074.
37.
El SayedMMDinaAEbKhedrMAMc, et al.Effects of nasal desmopressin spray versus topical epinephrine on surgical field clarity and hemodynamics in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a randomized clinical study. Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care2024; 11: 1–8.
38.
LiMLiWShaQ, et al.Analysis of the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic nasal dacryocystorhinostomy in the remedy of chronic dacryocystitis. Medicine (Baltimore)2024; 103: e36934.
39.
LeeSELimHBOhS, et al.Effects of Topical Anti-Glaucoma Medications on Outcomes of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Comparison with Age- and Sex-Matched Controls. J Clin Med2024; 13: 634.
40.
LiuSShuiLLiuZ, et al.Application of articaine in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a retrospective study. Front Med (Lausanne)2024; 11: 1332793.
41.
SalimaRW. Patency of stoma after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. J Med Sci Clin Res2019; 7: 497–500.
42.
RSRM. Dacryocystorhinostomy stent insertion in initial endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. An Int J Clin Rhinol2016; 9: 120–124.
43.
KerenSAbergelAManorA, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: reasons for failure. Eye (Lond)2020; 34: 948–953.
44.
DeviprasadDMaheshSGPujaryK, et al.Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2009; 61: 223–226.
MohamadSHKhanIShakeelM, et al.Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2013; 95: 196–199.
47.
LiEYChengACWongAC, et al.Safety and efficacy of adjunctive intranasal mitomycin C and triamcinolone in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Int Ophthalmol2016; 36: 105–110.
48.
MWKS. Efficacy of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Adv Med J2022; 6: 41–45.
49.
SungJYLeeYHKimKN, et al.Surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of age effect. Sci Rep2019; 9: 19861.
50.
TirakunwichchaSAeumjaturapatSSinprajakphonS. Efficacy of mitomycin C in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope2011; 121: 433–436.
51.
SwathiAPASTejaCB, et al.A clinical study on the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostom. Int J Health Sci2022; 6: 9856–9865.
52.
CoumouADGendersSWSmidTM, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: long-term experience and outcomes. Acta Ophthalmol2017; 95: 74–78.
53.
Al-Helo S. The Efficacy of Application of Mitomycin-C in Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Int J of Multidisciplinary and Current research2016; 4: 910–915.
54.
BaruahBSarawgiMSahuP, et al.Polypropylene in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a novel stent. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2018; 70: 240–243.
55.
DoJRLeeHBaekS, et al.Efficacy of postoperative mitomycin-C eye drops on the clinical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2016; 254: 785–790.
56.
KirtaneMVLallAChavanK, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with flap suturing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2013; 65: 236–241.
57.
KamalSAliMJNairAG. Outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: experience of a fellowship trainee at a tertiary care center. Indian J Ophthalmol2016; 64: 648–653.
58.
ShailiSSGSGAKP, et al.A comparative study of the results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stent placement. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg2021; 7: 525–529.
59.
SonkhyaNMishraP. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy with nasal mucosal and posterior lacrimal sac flap. J Laryngol Otol2009; 123: 320–326.
CodereFDentonPCoronaJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg2010; 26: 161–164.
62.
GoelMSharmaMKotwalD, et al.Comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy over external dacryocy storhinostomy. Indian J Anat Surg Head, Neck Brain2017; 2: 92–97.
63.
EmanuelliEPagellaFDaneG, et al.Posterior lacrimal sac approach technique without stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital2013; 33: 324–328.
64.
YuBXiaYSunJY, et al.Surgical outcomes in acute dacryocystitis patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube intubation. Int J Ophthalmol2021; 14: 844–848.
65.
YuenKSLamLYTseMW, et al.Modified endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with posterior lacrimal sac flap for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Hong Kong Med J2004; 10: 394–400.
66.
YoonSWYoonYSLeeSH. Clinical results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using a microdebrider. Korean J Ophthalmol2006; 20: 1–6.
67.
YarmohammadiMEGhasemiHJafariF, et al.Teamwork endoscopic endonasal surgery in failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res2016; 11: 282–286.
68.
WuWCannonPSYanW, et al.Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis. Eye (Lond)2011; 25: 746–753.
69.
WuSXuTFanB, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with an otologic T-type ventilation tube in repeated revision cases. BMC Ophthalmol2017; 17: 138.
70.
WattsPRamARNairR, et al.Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and 5-fluorouracil augmented endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A retrospective review. Indian J Ophthalmol2001; 49: 169–172.
71.
WangDFangPZhaoY. Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with a lobulated pedicled nasal Mucosa flap technique for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting. Ear Nose Throat J2021; 100: 618S–623S.
72.
VishwakarmaRSinghNGhoshR. A study of 272 cases of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2004; 56: 259–261.
73.
SuPY. Comparison of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Taiwan J Ophthalmol2018; 8: 19–23.
74.
SungJYKimJMHwangJY, et al.Optimal Timing for Primary Early Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Acute Dacryocystitis. J Clin Med2021; 10: 2161
75.
SomukBTAlimSSapmazE, et al.Comparison of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy results and analysis of Patients’ satisfaction. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol2016; 54: 99–104.
76.
ShinHYPaikJSYangSW. Clinical results of anti-adhesion adjuvants after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Korean J Ophthalmol2018; 32: 433–437.
77.
SarojGRashmiG. Conventional dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy-a comparative study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2010; 62: 296–298.
78.
RaghuwanshiSKRaghuwanshiSAgarwalM, et al.Primary endonasal DCR without stent: our experience and case series analysis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2015; 67: 271–274.
79.
PrakashMDViswanathaBRasikaR. Powered endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps and trimming of anterior End of middle turbinate. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2015; 67: 333–337.
80.
PradhanPBhardwajAMandalS, et al.Double posterior based flap technique in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without using powered instrument. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2017; 69: 474–479.
81.
NayakDRHazarikaPRodriguesRA, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy vs KTP 532 laser-assisted endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2005; 57: 278–282.
82.
MudholRRZingadeNDMudholRS, et al.Prospective randomized comparison of mitomycin C application in endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2013; 65: 255–259.
83.
MishraAKNilakantanAMishraS, et al.Comparison of balloon dacryocystorhinostomy with conventional endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for relief of acquired distal nasolacrimal drainage obstruction and its impact on quality of life: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Med J Armed Forces India2018; 74: 255–263.
84.
MaSTShinSNavaleA, et al.Regression course of ostium granulomas under topical intranasal steroids coverage after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Sci Rep2024; 14: 17089.
85.
MajhiSSharmaA. Evaluation of role of mitomycin C in the cases of nasolacrimal duct blockage undergoing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2019; 71: 1981–1985.
86.
KovalTZlotoOYakirevitchA, et al.No impact of nasal septoplasty on the outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond)2020; 34: 1454–1458.
87.
KarasuBKirayGErisE, et al.Comparison of success between external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Turkish cohort. North Clin Istanb2020; 7: 579–584.
88.
JutleyGKarimRJoharatnamN, et al.Patient satisfaction following endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a quality of life study. Eye (Lond)2013; 27: 1084–1089.
89.
JoshiRSDeshpandeAS. Success rate of conventional dacryocystorhinostomy in post-acute dacryocystitis compared to endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in acute dacryocystitis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res2017; 12: 290–295.
90.
JiQSZhongJXTuYH, et al.New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in asians. Int J Ophthalmol2012; 5: 704–707.
91.
JinHRYeonJYChoiMY. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: creation of a large marsupialized lacrimal sac. J Korean Med Sci2006; 21: 719–723.
92.
JhaKNRamalingamW. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a retrospective study. Med J Armed Forces India2009; 65: 23–25.
93.
Jayantha KedilayaYChackoAPooreyVK. Improving the results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mitomycin C application: a prospective case-control study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2018; 70: 477–481.
94.
HarugopASMudholRSRekhaBK, et al.Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2008; 60: 335–340.
95.
GoyalRGuptaS. Analysis of 104 cases of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in a tertiary care hospital: a prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2014; 66: 102–105.
96.
Erfanian SalimRMohammadiS. Results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy; necessity of teamwork and patient selection. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol2015; 4: 114–119.
97.
DavidSRajuRJobA, et al.A comparative study of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy - a preliminary report. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 52: 37–39.
98.
DasSKSarkarPDanA, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a study at IPGMER, Kolkata. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2013; 65: 366–370.
99.
ChoiJCJinHRMoonYE, et al.The surgical outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol2009; 2: 141–144.
100.
ChiYCLaiCC. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with short-term, pushed-type bicanalicular intubation vs. Pulled-type monocanalicular intubation for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Front Med (Lausanne)2022; 9: 946083.
CeylanSMErdoganCSozenT, et al.The fibrin glue application enhances surgical success rate in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with lacrimal sac preservation. Ear Nose Throat J2021; 100: 483S–488S.
103.
BharangarSSinghNLalV. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: best surgical management for DCR. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2012; 64: 366–369.
104.
AtkovaELFedorovAARootAO, et al.Causes of unsatisfactory results of the use of mitomycin-C in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Saudi J Ophthalmol2017; 31: 150–155.
105.
Araujo FilhoBCVoegelsRLButuganO, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystrhinostomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol2005; 71: 721–725.
106.
RomanosMMedawarCHallitS, et al.Nasal flap preservation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int J Ophthalmol2024; 17: 1633–1638.
107.
NayakDRSathishKRShahP, et al.Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and retrograde nasolacrimal duct dilatation with cannulation: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 52: 23–27.
108.
NaikSMAppajiMKRavishankaraS, et al.Endonasal DCR with silicon tube stents: a better management for acute lacrimal abscesses. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2013; 65: 343–349.
109.
ZhangMQWangX. Rupture of a previously undiagnosed intracranial aneurysm during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a case report. Clin Case Rep2023; 11: e6749.
110.
LubberdingAFThomsenMB. Low-Dose Adrenaline reduces blood pressure acutely in anesthetized pigs through a beta2-adrenergic pathway. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol2019; 74: 38–43.
111.
FellowsIWBennettTMacDonaldIA. The effect of Adrenaline upon cardiovascular and metabolic functions in man. Clin Sci (Lond)1985; 69: 215–222.
112.
DaulAHermesUSchafersRF, et al.The beta-adrenoceptor subtype(s) mediating Adrenaline- and dobutamine-induced blood pressure and heart rate changes in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther1995; 33: 140–148.
113.
Part 7.3: Management of Symptomatic Bradycardia and Tachycardia. Circulation. 2007; 112(24): IV67–IV77.
114.
RemondCLeporatiJProeschelM, et al.Catecholamine-induced acute myocardial stunning after accidental intra-operative noradrenaline bolus. Anaesth Rep2022; 10: e12187.
115.
StretchBBellAKaurN. Myocardial injury secondary to Adrenaline toxicity. Anaesthesia2024; 79: 1005.
116.
KwonOYChungSPLeeKR, et al.Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage after intravenous epinephrine use for multiple bee stings. Am J Emerg Med2007; 25: 249–250.
117.
GautamSKumarSPrakashR, et al.Intraventricular haemorrhage as a complication of sub mucosal infiltration of Adrenaline. J Clin Diagn Res2015; 9: 1–2.
118.
WilcsekGAVoseMJFrancisIC, et al.Acute angle closure glaucoma following the use of intranasal cocaine during dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol2002; 86: 1312.
119.
DrivasEIHajiioannouJKLachanasVA, et al.Cocaine versus tetracaine in septoplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Laryngol Otol2007; 121: 130–133.
120.
NicholsonKERogersJE. Cocaine and Adrenaline paste: a fatal combination?Br Med J1995; 311: 250–251.
121.
SchwalmJDHamstraJMuljiA, et al.Cardiogenic shock following nasal septoplasty: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Anaesth2008; 55: 376–379.
122.
RenYWangYYanH, et al.Cardiovascular crisis after use of epinephrine: a case report and review of the literature. AME Case Rep2021; 5: 31.
123.
TarverCPNoorilyADSakaiCS. A comparison of cocaine vs. lidocaine with oxymetazoline for use in nasal procedures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1993; 109: 653–659.
124.
JoganathanVBeigiB. Safety of the use of xylometazoline nasal spray in young children undergoing lacrimal surgery: an observational study. Eur J Ophthalmol2018; 28: 279–281.
125.
LaffeyJGNeliganPOrmondeG. Prolonged perioperative myocardial ischemia in a young male: due to topical intranasal cocaine?J Clin Anesth1999; 11: 419–424.
126.
GunRYorgancilarEYildirimM, et al.Effects of lidocaine and Adrenaline combination on postoperative edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2011; 40: 722–729.
127.
KumariINUAroraSGuptaP. Acute massive pulmonary edema and myocardial infarction after intranasal infiltration of Adrenaline during septorhinoplasty. Anaesth, Pain & Intensive Care2011; 15: Jul–Sept.
AlgamdiSSAlshaibaniAKAlkharsWI, et al.Branch retinal artery occlusion following rhinoplasty: a case report. Cureus2023; 15: e42265.
130.
NesbittNBNollerMWWatsonNL, et al.Outcomes and complications with topical epinephrine in endoscopic Sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2020; 163: 410–417.
131.
MoshaverALinDPintoR, et al.The hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2009; 135: 1005–1009.
132.
ReidJWRotenbergBWSowerbyLJ. Contemporary decongestant practices of Canadian otolaryngologists for endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2019; 48: 15.
133.
AhmedOGYuJChoiJS, et al.Real-time hemodynamic effects of 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 injectable epinephrine and placement of topical 1:1000 epinephrine pledgets in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus and skull-base surgery: a randomized, prospective study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol2020; 10: 141–146.
134.
Mujahid AMSMAliSWahabMU, et al.Hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of two different doses of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Professional Med J2023; 30: 516–522.
135.
BhatiaNGhaiBMangalK, et al.Effect of intramucosal infiltration of different concentrations of Adrenaline on hemodynamics during transsphenoidal surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol2014; 30: 520–525.
136.
GranierMDadureCBringuierS, et al.Intranasal lidocaine plus naphazoline nitrate improves surgical conditions and perioperative analgesia in septorhinoplasty surgery. Can J Anaesth2009; 56: 102–108.
137.
HigginsTSHwangPHKingdomTT, et al.Systematic review of topical vasoconstrictors in endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope2011; 121: 422–432.
138.
RiegleEVGunterJBLuskRP, et al.Comparison of vasoconstrictors for functional endoscopic sinus surgery in children. Laryngoscope1992; 102: 820–823.
139.
PavlovVEPolushinYSKolotilovLV, et al.Intraoperative bleeding control with terlipressin in functional endoscopic Sinus surgery. Laryngoscope2023; 133: 3313–3318.
140.
YanivEShveroJHadarT. Hemostatic effect of tranexamic acid in elective nasal surgery. Am J Rhinol2006; 20: 227–229.
141.
WhitworthKJohnsonJWisniewskiS, et al.Comparative effectiveness of topically administered tranexamic acid versus topical oxymetazoline spray for achieving hemostasis in epistaxis. J Emerg Med2020; 58: 211–216.
142.
OlanoffLSTitusCRSheaMS, et al.Effect of intranasal histamine on nasal mucosal blood flow and the antidiuretic activity of desmopressin. J Clin Invest1987; 80: 890–895.
143.
MizuguchiHKitamuraYKondoY, et al.Preseasonal prophylactic treatment with antihistamines suppresses nasal symptoms and expression of histamine H(1) receptor mRNA in the nasal mucosa of patients with pollinosis. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol2010; 32: 745–748.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
