This study investigated the applicability of a validated AI-algorithm for analyzing different retinal biomarkers in eyes affected by epiretinal membranes (ERMs) before and after surgery.
Methods
A retrospective study included 40 patients surgically treated for ERMs removal between November 2022 and January 2024. Pars plana vitrectomy with ERM/ILM peeling was performed by a single experienced surgeon. A validated AI algorithm was used to analyze OCT scans, focusing on intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volumes, external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) interruption percentages and hyper-reflective foci (HRF) counts.
Results
Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved (p < 0.01), and central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 483.61 ± 96.32 to 386.82 ± 94.86 µm (p = 0.001). IRF volume reduced from 0.283 ± 0.39 mm3 to 0.142 ± 0.27 mm3 (p = 0.036) particularly in the central 1 mm-circle. SRF, HRF and EZ/ELM interruption percentages exhibited no significant differences (p > 0.05). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were found between preoperative BCVA and postoperative BCVA (r = 0.45); CMT reduction and postoperative BCVA (r = 0.42), preoperative IRF and Visual Recovery (r = −0.48), ELM and EZ interruption and visual recovery (r = −0.43 and r = −0.47 respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fluid distribution, especially in the central subfield, correlated with BCVA recovery (R2 = 0.38; p < 0.05; Pillai's Trace = 0.79).
Conclusion
The study highlights AI's potential in quantifying OCT biomarkers in ERMs surgery. The findings suggest that improved BCVA is associated with reduced CMT, IRF, and redistribution of IRF towards the periphery. EZ and ELM integrities remain crucial prognostic factors, emphasizing the importance of the preoperative analysis.
BuS-CKuijerRLiX-R, et al.Idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina2014; 34: 2317–2335.
2.
Fraser-BellSGuzowskiMRochtchinaE, et al.Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology2003; 110: 34–40.
3.
MitchellPSmithWCheyT, et al.Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology1997; 104: 1033–1040.
4.
Meuer SM, Myers CE, Klein BE, et al. The epidemiology of vitreoretinal interface abnormalities as detected by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the beaver dam eye study. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 787–795.
5.
CrincoliESacconiRQuerquesG. Reshaping the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: sometimes you need to go backwards. Retina2023; 43: 1429–1432.
6.
FungATGalvinJTranT. Epiretinal membrane: a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol2021; 49: 289–308.
7.
HirokawaHKadoMYoshidaA. Role of the vitreous in idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis indicated by visual acuity in follow-up cases. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi1990; 94: 61–64.
8.
OngSJKuriyanAESmiddyWE. Results and prognostic factors for visual improvement after pars Plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina2015; 35: 866–872.
9.
NicolaiMFranceschiADe TurrisS, et al.Correlation between retinal sensitivity and retinal vascular perfusion after idiopathic epiretinal membrane peeling. Eur J Ophthalmol2024; 34: 1228–1238.
10.
GovettoALalaneRA3rdSarrafD, et al.Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol2017; 175: 99–113.
11.
TariSRVidne-HayOGreensteinVC, et al.Functional and structural measurements for the assessment of internal limiting membrane peeling in idiopathic macular pucker. Retina2007; 27: 567–572.
12.
SebagJ. The vitreoretinal interface and its role in the pathogenesis of vitreomaculopathies. Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2015; 112: 10–19.
13.
Schmidt-ErfurthUSadeghipourAGerendasBS, et al.Artificial intelligence in retina. Prog Retin Eye Res2018; 67: 1–29.
14.
ChakrobortySGuptaMDevishamaniCS, et al.Narrative review of artificial intelligence in diabetic macular edema: diagnosis and predicting treatment response using optical coherence tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol2021; 69: 2999–3008.
15.
ShahriariMHSabbaghiHAsadiF, et al.Artificial intelligence in screening, diagnosis, and classification of diabetic macular edema: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol2023; 68: 42–53.
16.
SchleglTWaldsteinSMBogunovicH, et al.Fully automated detection and quantification of macular fluid in OCT using deep learning. Ophthalmology2018; 125: 549–558.
17.
HabraOGallardoMMeyer Zu WestramT, et al.Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based detector of sub- and intraretinal fluid on a large set of optical coherence tomography volumes in age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmologica2022; 245: 516–527.
18.
RobertsPKVoglW-DGerendasBS, et al.Quantification of fluid resolution and visual acuity gain in patients with diabetic macular edema using deep learning: a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol2020; 138: 945–953.
19.
LeeCSBaughmanDMLeeAY. Deep learning is effective for the classification of OCT images of normal versus age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina2017; 1: 322–327.
20.
MariottiCMangoniLIorioS, et al.Novel artificial intelligence-based assessment of imaging biomarkers in full-thickness macular holes: Preliminary data from a pivotal trial. J Clin Med13. Epub ahead of print January 22, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020628.
21.
MidenaETotoLFrizzieroL, et al.Validation of an automated artificial intelligence algorithm for the quantification of major OCT parameters in diabetic macular edema. J Clin Med12. Epub ahead of print March 9, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062134.
FioreTAndroudiSIaccheriB, et al.Repeatability and reproduci-bility of retinal thickness measurements in diabetic patients with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res2013; 38: 674–679.
24.
ParejaJCoronadoAContrerasI. Epiretinal membrane surgery in daily clinical practice: results of a proposed management scheme. J Ophthalmol2019; 2019: 8246858.
25.
AsariaRGarnhamLGregorZJ, et al.A prospective study of binocular visual function before and after successful surgery to remove a unilateral epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology2008; 115: 1930–1937.
26.
MiguelAIMLegrisA. Prognostic factors of epiretinal membranes: a systematic review. J Fr Ophtalmol2017; 40: 61–79.
27.
ScheerlinckLMEvan der ValkRvan LeeuwenR. Predictive factors for postoperative visual acuity in idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol2015; 93: 203–212.
28.
ChuaPYSandinhaMTSteelDH. Idiopathic epiretinal membrane: progression and timing of surgery. EYE2022; 36: 495–503.
29.
González-SaldivarGBergerAWongD, et al.Ectopic inner foveal layer classification scheme predicts visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina2020; 40: 710–717.
30.
VenhuizenFGvan GinnekenBLiefersB, et al.Deep learning approach for the detection and quantification of intraretinal cystoid fluid in multivendor optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express2018; 9: 1545–1569.
31.
LoY-CLinK-HBairH, et al.Epiretinal membrane detection at the ophthalmologist level using deep learning of optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep2020; 10: 8424.
32.
Parra-MoraECazanas-GordonAProencaR, et al.Epiretinal membrane detection in optical coherence tomography retinal images using deep learning. IEEE Access2021; 9: 99201–99219.
33.
Casado-GarcíaÁGarcía-DomínguezMHerasJ, et al.Prediction of epiretinal membrane from retinal fundus images using deep learning. In: Lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 3–13.
34.
MikhailDMiladDAntakiF, et al.The role of artificial intelligence in epiretinal membrane care: a scoping review. Ophthalmol Sci2024; 5: 100689.
35.
CrincoliESavastanoMCSavastanoA, et al.New artificial intelligence analysis for prediction of long-term visual improvement after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina2023; 43: 173–181.
36.
ByonISPakGYKwonHJ, et al.Natural history of idiopathic epiretinal membrane in eyes with good vision assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica2015; 234: 91–100.
37.
LuuK-YKoenigsaeckerTYazdanyarA, et al.Long-term natural history of idiopathic epiretinal membranes with good visual acuity. EYE2019; 33: 714–723.
38.
FajgenbaumMAPNeffendorfJEWongRS, et al.Intraoperative and postoperative complications in phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane and macular hole: a clinical audit of 1,000 consecutive eyes. Retina2018; 38: 1865–1872.
39.
InoueMMoritaSWatanabeY, et al.Preoperative inner segment/outer segment junction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina2011; 31: 1366–1372.
40.
KauffmannYRamelJ-CLefebvreA, et al.Preoperative prognostic factors and predictive score in patients operated on for combined cataract and idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol2015; 160: 185–92.e5.
41.
SongSJKuriyanAESmiddyWE. Results and prognostic factors for visual improvement after pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina2015; 35: 866–872.
42.
DawsonSRShunmugamMWilliamsonTH. Visual acuity outcomes following surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: an analysis of data from 2001 to 2011. EYE2014; 28: 219–224.
43.
DeltourJ-BGrimbertPMasseH, et al.Detrimental effects of active internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery: microperimetric analysis. Retina2017; 37: 544–552.
44.
RahmanRStephensonJ. Early surgery for epiretinal membrane preserves more vision for patients. EYE2014; 28: 410–414.
45.
MoisseievEKinoriMMorozI, et al.25-gauge Vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling in eyes with very good visual acuity. Curr Eye Res2016; 41: 1387–1392.
46.
ReillyGMelamudALipscombP, et al.Surgical outcomes in patients with macular pucker and good preoperative visual acuity after vitrectomy with membrane peeling. Retina2015; 35: 1817–1821.
47.
GovettoAVirgiliGRodriguezFJ, et al.Functional and anatomical significance of the ectopic inner foveal layers in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membranes: surgical results at 12 months. Retina2019; 39: 347–357.
48.
AlkabesMFogagnoloPVujosevicS, et al.Correlation between new OCT parameters and metamorphopsia in advanced stages of epiretinal membranes. Acta Ophthalmol2020; 98: 780–786.
49.
SatoTMoriRTakahashiS, et al.Retrospective comparison of visual prognosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes with and without an ectopic inner foveal layer. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina2018; 49: 838–845.
GovettoABhavsarKVVirgiliG, et al.Tractional abnormalities of the central foveal bouquet in epiretinal membranes: clinical spectrum and pathophysiological perspectives. Am J Ophthalmol2017; 184: 167–180.
52.
TsunodaKWatanabeKAkiyamaK, et al.Highly reflective foveal region in optical coherence tomography in eyes with vitreomacular traction or epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology2012; 119: 581–587.
53.
BurggraaffMCTrieuJde Vries-KnoppertWAEJ, et al.The clinical spectrum of microcystic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2014; 55: 952–961.
54.
RubertoGParisiVVandelliG, et al.Surgery for idiopathic epimacular membrane: morpho-functional outcomes based on the preoperative macular integrity of the photoreceptoral junction. A prospective pilot study. Adv Ther2020; 37: 566–577.
55.
UjiAMurakamiTUnokiN, et al.Parallelism as a novel marker for structural integrity of retinal layers in optical coherence tomographic images in eyes with epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol2014; 157: 227–236.e4.
56.
JoeSGLeeKSLeeJY, et al.Inner retinal layer thickness is the major determinant of visual acuity in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Acta Ophthalmol2013; 91: e242–e243.
57.
KimJHKimYMChungEJ, et al.Structural and functional predictors of visual outcome of epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol2012; 153: 103–10.e1.
58.
ShimozonoMOishiAHataM, et al.The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol2012; 153: 698–704.
59.
ItohYInoueMRiiT, et al.Correlation between foveal cone outer segment tips line and visual recovery after epiretinal membrane surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2013; 54: 7302–7308.
60.
OsterSFMojanaFBrarM, et al.Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment layer on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography is a predictor of poor visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membranes. Retina2010; 30: 713–718.
61.
FragiottaSAbdolrahimzadehSDolz-MarcoR, et al.Significance of hyperreflective foci as an optical coherence tomography biomarker in retinal diseases: characterization and clinical implications. J Ophthalmol2021; 2021: 6096017.
62.
BolzMSchmidt-ErfurthUDeakG, et al.Optical coherence tomographic hyperreflective foci: a morphologic sign of lipid extravasation in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology2009; 116: 914–920.
63.
JohnsonMW. Tractional cystoid macular edema: a subtle variant of the vitreomacular traction syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol2005; 140: 184–192.
64.
RomanoVAngiMScottiF, et al.Inflammation and macular oedema after pars plana vitrectomy. Mediators Inflamm2013; 2013: 971758.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
