Microvascular changes after proton beam radiotherapy for iris melanoma: An optical coherence tomography angiography study

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate macular and peripapillary microvascular changes after proton beam radiotherapy for iris melanoma using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A).

Methods

Patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy for iris melanoma were included in the iris melanoma group. Fellow eyes were used as controls. Vessel density (VD) of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) of the macula, radial peripapillary capillary plexus (RPCP) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were evaluated using OCT-A. Central macular thickness (CMT) and nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) were also investigated.

Results

A total of 11 patients were included. Vessel density in the whole SCP was comparable between treated eyes and untreated fellow eyes (p = 0.32). Vessel density in the whole DCP was lower in the iris melanoma group compared with untreated fellow eyes: 39% [standard deviation (SD) 1.9] versus 49% (SD 4.1), respectively (p < 0.001). Vessel density of the whole RPCP was lower in the iris melanoma group compared with untreated fellow eyes: 44% (SD 3.5) versus 48% (SD 2.2), respectively (p = 0.02). No differences between treated eyes and untreated fellow eyes were noted when evaluating FAZ, CMT and RNFL thickness.

Conclusion

Irradiation of the iris may determine vascular damage in the uveal tract, which, consequently, can affect the retinal vascular network. Changes in OCT-A parameters detected in DCP and RPCP may be early signs of microvascular impairment in these patients.

Keywords

Iris melanoma proton beam radiotherapy oct angiography uveal melanoma.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Broggi

Falzone

Fallico

, et al. Prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) in uveal melanoma: a clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical study on a series of 85 cases. Appl Sci 2021; 11: 7874. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/APP11177874

Basile

Mazzon

Fagone

, et al. Immunobiology of uveal melanoma: state of the art and therapeutic targets. Front Oncol 2019 Nov 5; 9: 1145. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01145. PMID: 31750244; PMCID: PMC6848265.

Russo

Avitabile

Reibaldi

, et al. Iris melanoma: management and prognosis. Appl Sci 2020; 10: 8766. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10248766

Barbagallo

Stella

Broggi

, et al. Genetics and RNA regulation of uveal melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 775. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS15030775

Fallico

Raciti

Longo

, et al. Current molecular and clinical insights into uveal melanoma (review). Int J Oncol 2021; 58: 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/IJO.2021.5190

Thariat

Rahmi

Salleron

, et al. Proton beam therapy for iris melanomas in 107 patients. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 606–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.009

Shields

Shah

Bianciotto

, et al. Iris melanoma management with iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy in 144 patients: impact of melanoma-related glaucoma on outcomes. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 55–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.053

Yousef

Finger

. Lack of radiation maculopathy after palladium-103 plaque radiotherapy for iris melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83: 1107–1112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2011.09.033

Fallico

Chronopoulos

Schutz

, et al. Treatment of radiation maculopathy and radiation-induced macular edema: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 2021 May-Jun; 66: 441–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.08.007. PMID: 32918934.

10.

Fallico

Reibaldi

Avitabile

, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of radiation-induced macular edema after ruthenium 106 plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257: 1547–1554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04347-6

11.

Bonfiglio

Ortisi

Nebbioso

, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography evaluation of peripapillary microvascular changes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 2021; 41: 2540–2548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003253

12.

Bonfiglio

Ortisi

Scollo

, et al. Vascular changes after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: optical coherence tomography angiography study. Acta Ophthalmol 2020; 98: e563–e569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14315

13.

Fallico

Longo

Avitabile

, et al. Microvascular changes after scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2022; 12: 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS12123015

14.

Cennamo

Reibaldi

Montorio

, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography features in post COVID-19 pneumonia patients: a pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol March 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.015

15.

Skalet

Liu

Binder

, et al. Longitudinal detection of radiation-induced peripapillary and macular retinal capillary ischemia using OCT angiography. Ophthalmol Retin 2020; 4: 320–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORET.2019.10.001

16.

Matet

Daruich

Zografos

. Radiation maculopathy after proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma: optical coherence tomography angiography alterations influencing visual acuity. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 3851–3861. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22324

17.

De Carlo

Mieler

. Automated quantitative OCTA measurements of uveal melanoma-treated eyes with and without radiation retinopathy after I-125 plaque therapy and of nonirradiated fellow eyes. Eye (Lond) 2021; 35: 769–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/S41433-020-01237-8

18.

Shields

Say

EAT

Samara

, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the macula after plaque radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma: comparison of irradiated versus nonirradiated eyes in 65 patients. Retina 2016; 36: 1493–1505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001021

19.

Cennamo

Montorio

Bernardo

, et al. Retinal vascular changes in radiation maculopathy after intravitreal ranibizumab by optical coherence tomography angiography. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM9061618

20.

Naseripour

Ghasemi Falavarjani

Mirshahi

Sedaghat

. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) Applications in ocular oncology. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34: 1535–1545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/S41433-020-0819-Y

21.

Veverka

Abouchehade

Iezzi

, et al. Noninvasive grading of radiation retinopathy: the use of optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2015; 35: 2400–2410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000844

22.

Woo

Yoon

Woo

, et al. Foveal avascular zone area changes analyzed using OCT angiography after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Curr Eye Res 2018; 43: 674–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2018.1437922

23.

Dimitrova

Chihara

. Implication of deep-vascular-layer alteration detected by optical coherence tomography angiography for the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologica 2019; 241: 179–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000495624

24.

Say

EAT

Samara

Khoo

CTL

, et al. Parafoveal capillary density after plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma: analysis of eyes without radiation maculopathy. Retina 2016; 36: 1670–1678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001085

25.

Gawęcki

Prądzyńska

Karska-Basta

. Long-Term variations in retinal parameters after uncomplicated cataract surgery. J Clin Med 2022 Jun 15; 11: 3426. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123426. PMID: 35743496; PMCID: PMC9225292.