To assess the agreement between Anterion AS-OCT and three optical devices in measuring the white-to-white (WTW) diameter in candidates for refractive surgery.
Methods
In this cross-sectional prospective study, 129 right eyes of 129 normal individuals underwent consecutive scans with the Anterion, the Pentacam AXL, the IOLMaster 700, and the Orbscan IIz. Mean difference (MD), 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were calculated to assess agreement and interchangeability.
Results
The mean age of participants was 30.4 ± 5.9 (range: 21–47) years. The mean WTW distance measured by the different instruments was as follows: 12.00 ± 0.42 mm (range, 10.57 to 13.05) using the Anterion, 11.87 ± 0.34 (11.10 to 12.80) using the Pentacam, 12.12 ± 0.44 (11.00 to 13.30) using the IOLMaster, and 11.73 ± 0.37 (11.00 to 13.10) using the Orbscan. The MD and 95% LoA for Anterion vs. Pentacam, IOLMaster, or Orbscan were [0.11; −0.31 to 0.54 mm], [-0.13; −0.93 to 0.66], and [0.25; −0.28 to 0.78], respectively. The corresponding CCCs were 0.803, 0.514, and 0.631.
Conclusions
This study found weak agreement between Anterion and Pentacam AXL, IOLMaster 700, and Orbscan IIz devices regarding WTW distance measurements in refractive surgery candidates. Therefore, it is not recommended to use Anterion's WTW measurements interchangeably with the other three devices, particularly for phakic intraocular lens sizing.
GharaeeHAbrishamiMShafieeM, et al.White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy Iranian population obtained with the Orbscan II. Int J Ophthalmol2014; 7: 309–312. 20140418. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.20
2.
WernerLIzakAMPandeySK, et al.Correlation between different measurements within the eye relative to phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg2004; 30: 1982–1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.10.041
3.
SeoJHKimMKWeeWR, et al.Effects of white-to-white diameter and anterior chamber depth on implantable collamer lens vault and visual outcome. J Refract Surg2009; 25: 730–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20090707-08
4.
AngRETReyesEKFAyuyaoFAJ, et al.Comparison of white-to-white measurements using four devices and their determination of ICL sizing. Eye and Vision2022; 9: 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00308-z
5.
Carmona GonzálezDPalomino BautistaC. Accuracy of a new intraocular lens power calculation method based on artificial intelligence. Eye (Lond)2021; 35: 517–522. 20200428. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-0883-3
BaumeisterMTerziEEkiciY, et al.Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg2004; 30: 374–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.06.004
8.
PiñeroDPPlaza PucheABAlióJL. Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle-to-angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: evaluation of equivalence. J Cataract Refract Surg2008; 34: 126–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.010
9.
Domínguez-VicentAPérez-VivesCFerrer-BlascoT, et al.Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review. Int J Ophthalmol2016; 9: 1057–1065. 20160718. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.07.20
10.
UçakhanOAkbelVBıyıklıZ, et al.Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS 900 and the Pentacam. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol2013; 20: 201–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.114791
11.
PardeshiAASongAELazkaniN, et al.Intradevice repeatability and interdevice agreement of ocular biometric measurements: a comparison of two swept-source anterior segment OCT devices. Transl Vis Sci Technol2020; 9: 14. 20200807. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.9.14
12.
ChanTCYWanKHTangFY, et al.Repeatability and agreement of a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer IOLMaster 700 versus a scheimpflug imaging-based biometer AL-scan in cataract patients. Eye Contact Lens2020; 46: 35–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000603
13.
Buckenham BoyleANamkungSShewW, et al.Repeatability and agreement of white-to-white measurements between slit-scanning tomography, infrared biometry, dual rotating scheimpflug camera/placido disc tomography, and swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. PLoS One2021; 16: e0254832–20210716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254832
14.
SaloutiRNowroozzadehMHTajbakhshZ, et al.Agreement of corneal diameter measurements obtained by a swept-source biometer and a scheimpflug-based topographer. Cornea2017; 36: 1373–1376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001300
15.
TaechameekietichaiTNguyenAChansangpetchS, et al.Displacement between anterior chamber width obtained by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography and white-to-white distance. PLoS One2021; 16: e0251990. 20210520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251990
16.
NakamuraTIsogaiNKojimaT, et al.Optimization of implantable collamer lens sizing based on swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg2020; 46: 742–748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000134
17.
SinghRVanathiMKishoreA, et al.An anterior segment optical coherence tomography study of the anterior chamber angle after implantable collamer lens-V4c implantation in Asian Indian Eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol2020; 68: 1418–1423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1540_19
18.
Schiano-LomorielloDHofferKJAbiccaI, et al.Repeatability of automated measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and biometer and agreement with standard devices. Sci Rep2021; 11: 983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79674-4
19.
Escolano SerranoJTarazona JaimesCPMonera LucasCE, et al.Intraobserver repeatability of tomographic, pachymetric, and anatomical measurements in healthy eyes using a new swept-source optical coherence topographer. Cornea2022; 41: 598–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002799
20.
Montés-MicóRTañá-RiveroPAguilar-CórcolesS, et al.Assessment of anterior segment measurements using a high-resolution imaging device. Expert Rev Med Devices2020; 17: 969–979. 20200907. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1816463
PandaANandaASahooK. Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700. Indian J Ophthalmol2022; 70: 1594–1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2433_21
23.
PanthierCRougerHGozlanY, et al.Comparative analysis of 2 biometers using swept-source OCT technology. J Cataract Refract Surg2022; 48: 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000704
24.
PfaeffliOAWeberAHofferKJ, et al.Agreement of intraocular lens power calculation between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg2022; 48: 535–541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000788
25.
Tañá-RiveroPAguilar-CórcolesSRodríguez-PratsJL, et al.Agreement of white-to-white measurements with swept-source OCT, Scheimpflug and color LED devices. Int Ophthalmol2021; 41: 57–65. 20200828. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01552-9
26.
Tañá-RiveroPAguilar-CórcolesSTañá-SanzP, et al.Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts. Eye and Vision2023; 10: 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-023-00352-3
27.
Tañá-RiveroPAguilar-CórcolesSTello-ElordiC, et al.Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer. J Cataract Refract Surg2021; 47: 488–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000483
28.
Tañá-SanzPRuiz-SantosMRodríguez-CarrilloMD, et al.Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers. Expert Rev Med Devices2021; 18: 387–393. 20210330. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1905518
29.
AngRETReyesEKFAyuyaoFAJJr, et al.Comparison of white-to-white measurements using four devices and their determination of ICL sizing. Eye and Vision2022; 9: 36.
30.
WangWMiaoYSaviniG, et al.Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography. Sci Rep2017; 7: 13736. 20171023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13800-7
31.
SaloutiRNowroozzadehMHZamaniM, et al.Comparison of horizontal corneal diameter measurements using the Orbscan IIz and Pentacam HR systems. Cornea2013; 32: 1460–1464.
32.
SaloutiRKamalipourAMasihpourN, et al.Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on agreement of anterior segment variables obtained by a swept-source biometer vs a Scheimpflug-based tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg2020; 46: 1229–1235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000252
33.
SaloutiRAzimiAMeshksarA, et al.Intraocular pressure before and after corneal refractive surgery: a prospective comparison of corvis ST and ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma2024: 20240521. Online ahead of print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000002434
