To evaluate the correlations between anatomical and functional changes after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) surgery.
Methods
In this prospective, observational, single-center study, consecutive patients who underwent iERM peeling were enrolled. Reported data were pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity (RS) and fixation stability values on microperimetry, structural macular features on SD-OCT and OCTA. RS of foveal and parafoveal area was analysed and two sub-groups were identified whether RS improved or remained unchanged/worsened after surgery; consequently, vascular perfusion density (VPD) of the same area was studied.
Results
Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients were examined. The post-operative improvement in terms of BCVA, RS and fixation within the central 4 degrees was significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001), as well as the foveal thickness and macular volume change/reduction (p < 0.001). The pre-operative superficial VPD, choriocapillaris VPD and capillary free zone (CFZ) area were significantly reduced compared to the fellow healthy eye (p = 0.001, p = 0.02, p < 0.001). Choriocapillaris VPD showed a statistically significant increase after surgery (p < 0.02). Superficial, deep and choriocapillaris VPD of the improved RS group showed a significant increase both in foveal (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, p = 0.01) and parafoveal areas (p = 0.01, p = 0.03, p = 0.001).
Conclusions
We reported a higher VPD in the retinal area that experienced a retinal sensitivity improvement 6 months after ERM surgery. This result objectifies the tight bond between visual function and retinal perfusion in ERM patients.
IwanoffA. Beitrage zur normalen und pathologischen anatomy des auges. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1865; 11: 135–170.
2.
NgCHCheungNWangJJ, et al.Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membranes in a multi-ethnic United States population. Ophthalmology2011; 118: 694–699.
3.
MitchellPSmithWCheyT, et al.Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes: the blue mountains eye study, Australia. Ophthalmology1997; 104: 1033–1040.
4.
YouQXuLJonasJB. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in adult Chinese: the Beijing eye study. Eye2008; 22: 874–879.
5.
StevensonWProspero PonceCMAgarwalDR, et al.Epiretinal membrane: Optical coherence tomography-based diagnosis and classification. Clin Ophthalmol2016; 10: 527–534.
6.
Lund-AndersenHSebagJSanderB,et al.The vitreous. Adv Organ Biol2005; 10: 181–194.
7.
InoueMKadonosonoK. Macular diseases: Epiretinal membrane. Dev Ophthalmol2014; 54: 159–163.
8.
ChoHJKimCGYooSJ, et al.Retinal functional changes measured by microperimetry in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab. Am J Ophthalmology2013; 155: 118–126.
9.
GovettoAVirgiliGRodriguezFJ, et al.Functional and anatomical significance of the ectopic inner foveal layers in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membranes: Surgical results at 12 months. Retina2019; 39: 347–357.
10.
MiguelAIMLegrisA. Prognostic factors of epiretinal membranes: A systematic review. J Fr Ophtalmol2017; 40: 61–79.
11.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Retina and vitreous. AAO’s Basic Clin Sci Course2012; 4: 97–104.
12.
RatraVRatraDGuptaM,et al.Comparison between Humphrey Field Analyzer and Micro Perimeter 1 in normal and glaucoma subjects. Oman J Ophthalmology2012; 5: 97–102.
13.
RohrschneiderKBültmannSSpringerC. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. In Progr Retin Eye Res2008; 27: 536–548.
14.
MastropasquaRD’AloisioRViggianoP, et al.Early retinal flow changes after vitreoretinal surgery in idiopathic epiretinal membrane using swept source optical coherence tomography angiography. J Cl Med2019; 8: 2067.
15.
BorrelliESarrafDFreundKB,et al.OCT angiography and evaluation of the choroid and choroidal vascular disorders. Progr Retin Eye Res2018; 67: 30–55.
16.
MotulskyEZhengFShiY, et al.Imaging of epiretinal membranes using en face widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin2019; 50: 106–112.
ChylackLTWolfeJKSingerDM, et al.The lens opacities classification system III. Arch Ophthalmol1993; 111: 831–836.
19.
KarbassiMKhuPMSingerDM,et al.Evaluation of lens opacities classification system III applied at the slitlamp. Optom Vis Sci1993; 70: 923–928.
20.
VeckeneerMStalmansP. Vital stains for vitreoretinal surgery. Retina2013; 33: 673–677.
21.
GandorferAHaritoglouCSchelerR, et al.Residual cellular proliferation on the internal limiting membrane in macular pucker surgery. Retina2012; 32: 477–485.
22.
CarpentierCZanolliMWuL, et al.Residual internal limiting membrane after epiretinal membrane peeling: Results of the pan-American collaborative retina study group. Retina2013; 33: 2026–2031.
23.
SchaalKBMunkMRWyssmuellerI, et al.Vascular abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy assessed with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography widefield imaging. Retina2019; 39: 79–87.
24.
YoonYSWooJMWooJE,et al.Superficial foveal avascular zone area changes before and after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. Int J Ophthalmol2018; 11: 1711–1715.
25.
OnishiACFawziAA. An overview of optical coherence tomography angiography and the posterior pole. Ther Adv Ophthalmol2019: 11: 2515841419840249.
26.
MassinPAllouchCHaouchineB, et al.Optical coherence tomography of idiopathic macular epiretinal membranes before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol2000; 130: 732–739.
27.
AzzoliniCPatelliFCodenottiM, et al.Optical coherence tomography in idiopathic epiretinal macular membrane surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol1999; 9: 206–211.
28.
NiwaTTerasakiHKondoM, et al.Function and morphology of macula before and after removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Investigat Ophthalmol Vis Sci2003; 44: 1652–1656.
29.
García-FernándezMCastro NavarroJGonzález CastañoC, et al.Epiretinal membrane surgery: Anatomic and functional outcomes. Arch La Soc Española Oftalmol (English Edition)2013; 88: 139–144.
30.
JiaYBaileySTHwangTS, et al.Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of vascular abnormalities in the living human eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2015; 112: E2395–E2402.
31.
ChenHChiWCaiX, et al.Macular microvasculature features before and after vitrectomy in idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane: an OCT angiography analysis. Eye (Basingstoke)2019; 33: 619–628.
32.
PierroLIulianoLMarcheseA, et al.Reduced vascular perfusion density in idiopathic epiretinal membrane compared to macular pseudohole. Int Ophthal2019; 39: 2749–2755.
33.
NelisPAltenFClemensCR, et al.Quantification of changes in foveal capillary architecture caused by idiopathic epiretinal membrane using OCT angiography. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2017; 255: 1319–1324.
34.
RomanoMRCennamoGSchiemerS, et al.Deep and superficial OCT angiography changes after macular peeling: idiopathic vs diabetic epiretinal membranes. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2017; 255: 681–689.
35.
YagiTSakataKFunatsuH,et al.Evaluation of perifoveal capillary blood flow velocity before and after vitreous surgery for epiretinal membrane. In Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2012; 250: 459–460.
36.
KadonosonoKItohNNomuraE,et al.Capillary blood flow velocity in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Retina1999; 19: 536–539.
37.
KimYJKimSLeeJY, et al.Macular capillary plexuses after epiretinal membrane surgery: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Br J Ophthalmol2018; 102: 1086–1091.
38.
OsadaUKunikataHYasudaM, et al.Association of retinal vessel density with retinal sensitivity in surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2020; 258: 1911–1920.
39.
YuYTengYGaoM, et al.Quantitative choriocapillaris perfusion before and after vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane by optical coherence tomography angiography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Maging Retin2017; 48: 906–915.
40.
MastropasquaLBorrelliECarpinetoP, et al.Microvascular changes after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Int Ophthalmol2018; 38: 1465–1472.
41.
WolfSSchnurbuschUWiedemannP, et al.Peeling of the basal membrane in the human retina: Ultrastructural effects. Ophthalmology2004; 111: 238–243.
42.
SorcinelliR. Surgical management of epiretinal membrane with indocyanine-green-assisted peeling. Ophthalmologica2003; 217: 107–110.
43.
ParkDWDugelPUGardaJ, et al.Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: Pilot study. Ophthalmology2003; 110: 62–64.
44.
ClarkABalducciNPichiF, et al.Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina2012; 32: 1608–1613.
45.
PichiFLemboAMoraraM, et al.Early and late inner retinal changes after inner limiting membrane peeling. In Int Ophthalmol2014; 34: 437–446.
46.
AmariFOhtaKKojimaH,et al.Predicting visual outcome after macular hole surgery using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry. Br J Ophthalmol2001; 85: 96–98.
47.
NicolaiMFranceschiADe TurrisS, et al.Long-term improvement of retinal sensitivity after macular hole surgery over at least 9-year-old follow-up: a case series. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthal2020; 258: 1655–1662.
48.
SantarelliMVerittiDDal MasG,et al.Functional and morphological changes after macular pucker surgery: An optical coherence tomography and microperimetric study. Ophthalmologica2014; 232: 200–206.
49.
Richter-MuekschSVécsei-MarlovitsPVSacuSG, et al.Functional macular mapping in patients with vitreomacular pathologic features before and after surgery. Am J Ophthalmol2007; 144: 23–31.
50.
DonatiSCapraniSMSemeraroF, et al.Morphological and functional retinal assessment in epiretinal membrane surgery. Semin Ophthalmol2017; 32: 751–758.
51.
Dal VecchioMLaviaCNassisiM, et al.Microperimetric assessment after epiretinal membrane surgery: 4-year follow-up. J Ophthalmol2016; 2016: 7030791.
52.
RussoAMorescalchiFGambicortiE, et al.Epiretinal membrane removal with foveal-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling: a pilot study. Retina2019; 39: 2116–2124.
53.
SpaideRF. Measurable aspects of the retinal neurovascular unit in diabetes, glaucoma, and controls. Am J Ophthalmol2019; 207: 395–409.
54.
CataniaF, et al.Macular microvascular modifications in progressive lamellar macular holes. Diagnostics (Basel)2021 Sep 19; 11: 1717.
55.
BacheriniDSavastanoMCDragottoF, et al.Morpho-functional evaluation of full-thickness macular holes by the integration of optical coherence tomography angiography and microperimetry. J Cl Med2020; 9: 229.
